Comments on: A Twilight review from a pro-Twilighter

By: ANNA

ANNA — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:33:58 +0000

I love movie and book, i LOVE KRSIETN STUWART AS BELLA

0 0

By: bellaB

bellaB — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:59:56 +0000

I like Robert Pattinson’s Edward. Edward is hard on himself, of course, also in the books, if you read them. Robert has skill to portray multiple faces in one shot, just like Edward should (ferocious, gentle, stale, humorous). Edwards brain doesn’t work on one level only.

Robert is not only a pretty boy. If you look at his face, think of him when he is 70-80 years old. His face would be perfect for a Vampire even then: it’s so sculptural and unperfect and characteristic with the twists – maybe even better Vampire then, when he is older. He can display huge emotional scale, unlike many people of out times.

0 0

By: Darlene

Darlene — Sat, 09 May 2009 18:47:45 +0000

I never even heard of Twilight until my son bought all four books for his girlfriend for Chritams. Not having read the books and only seeing the movie less than a weeke ago I must say I enjoyed it. I thought the acting from both main characters were good. “Bella” was awkward and most teenagers at that age are, although I did not like the hospital scene where she gets all tongue tied becasue he “Edward” wants her to leave Forks. Edwatd of course seemed more mature, well hello he was much OLDER. LOVED the prom scene at the end where he kises her instead of bitting. I am going to go out and buy the books and read them before I see the next movies. I hopw that dosnt dpoil it for me

0 0

By: jazz

jazz — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:40:05 +0000

i thought the twilight movies were crap. They have destroyed the book for me. The actors looked like they have never acted before. I hated it !!! and i know hate is a strong word but is it true.

0 0

By: Kayla Rae

Kayla Rae — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:16:09 +0000

Dane, almost all of them were absolutely horrid actors. And the ones who were good actors were given the smallest and dumbest parts.

0 0

By: Alana

Alana — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:20:34 +0000

Okay so i love the twilight books. i thought the movies were okay but would have been a lot better if they followed the book. the movie made me very angry it was out of order and they skip a lot of important stuff, for example they did not tell you at all about the cullen family, so u wont no how they became a vampire. also they didnt tell u about how carliel became a vampire and y he is the way he is.they also didnt even add the scene the explains why the book it called twilight .the movie would be good if u didnt read the book, it also gets better they more times u watch it. please dont pay attention to my spelling errors.

0 0

By: Teresa

Teresa — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:31:11 +0000

Other than the bad typos and lack of proofreading, this was a spot-on review. I do disagree with your assessment of Rob Pattinson’s acting, however. He was good but the DIRECTING was really, really BAD. RPattz could have been soooo much better with a good director. He nailed the emotional makeup of the character, just not the execution of it on film. Bad directing, bad screenwriter. Good actors.

0 0

By: Dane

Dane — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:05:06 +0000

I think Kristen made a horrible Bella.

0 0