<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantum of Solace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/</link>
	<description>Music, movies, tv, video games, tech, food, drink, young, hip, and sexy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:39:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: harley93</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-7189</link>
		<dc:creator>harley93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5702#comment-7189</guid>
		<description>i agree with this, i think fields should have been in more, and i think  camille should have had more fight, she was kinda weak. and the number one worst thing about that movie was the jerky camera, when a fight scenes on, i like to be able to see whats happening, but the camera jerk distracts and blurs out the fight. i think to make it more bond-ish, it should have had more gadgets, more storyline and the more moments that show how bond is a clever and witty spy. its well planned funny action moments that i enjoy the best in bond movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with this, i think fields should have been in more, and i think  camille should have had more fight, she was kinda weak. and the number one worst thing about that movie was the jerky camera, when a fight scenes on, i like to be able to see whats happening, but the camera jerk distracts and blurs out the fight. i think to make it more bond-ish, it should have had more gadgets, more storyline and the more moments that show how bond is a clever and witty spy. its well planned funny action moments that i enjoy the best in bond movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yimi</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-7095</link>
		<dc:creator>Yimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5702#comment-7095</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree. As a lifetime Bond fanatic, I urge you to recognize that Casino Royale didn&#039;t display a huge amount of Bond, cliche moments. This is a new industry, not a regurgitation of past Bond movies----that would be vapid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree. As a lifetime Bond fanatic, I urge you to recognize that Casino Royale didn&#8217;t display a huge amount of Bond, cliche moments. This is a new industry, not a regurgitation of past Bond movies&#8212;-that would be vapid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Seth</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-7091</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5702#comment-7091</guid>
		<description>Totally agree.  Good action film but it has NOTHING to do with the bond.  

I understand that Forster wanted to continue to re-invent the franchise, but there&#039;s some things that every bond movie has to have.

One good thing: the oil covered redhead.  Nice throwback to goldfinger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.  Good action film but it has NOTHING to do with the bond.  </p>
<p>I understand that Forster wanted to continue to re-invent the franchise, but there&#8217;s some things that every bond movie has to have.</p>
<p>One good thing: the oil covered redhead.  Nice throwback to goldfinger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Penoi</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-7084</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Penoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5702#comment-7084</guid>
		<description>Do they have a blood test for reviewers that drank the Kool-Aid on genre orthodoxy?  Hope so, because we need to get all the current crop of reviewers tested and those that are positive put in quarantine till a cure is discovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they have a blood test for reviewers that drank the Kool-Aid on genre orthodoxy?  Hope so, because we need to get all the current crop of reviewers tested and those that are positive put in quarantine till a cure is discovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliz</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>eliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5702#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>Ok, ABC, for one, reviews are completely subjective so you should understand that before you read a review. And second, this review, in my opinion, is totally correct. 
Swap out our main man Bond&#039;s name for Jason Borne and you&#039;ve got the same type of action flick. Bond was different. It was quirky and gave you moments of, now, see, this is why I like Bond, because its not trying to be everyone else. 
This movie WAS trying to be like everyone else and it worked. But, as a Bond movie, it failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, ABC, for one, reviews are completely subjective so you should understand that before you read a review. And second, this review, in my opinion, is totally correct.<br />
Swap out our main man Bond&#8217;s name for Jason Borne and you&#8217;ve got the same type of action flick. Bond was different. It was quirky and gave you moments of, now, see, this is why I like Bond, because its not trying to be everyone else.<br />
This movie WAS trying to be like everyone else and it worked. But, as a Bond movie, it failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abc</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/11/quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>abc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5702#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>I only read one sentence of your review, and it pretty much sums up the reason I hate movie reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only read one sentence of your review, and it pretty much sums up the reason I hate movie reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
