<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blast Magazine&#187; hunting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blastmagazine.com/tag/hunting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blastmagazine.com</link>
	<description>Video games, movies, music, and smart magazine journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Discussing the impact of motorized vehicles in wilderness areas</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/earth/discussing-the-impact-of-motorized-vehicles-in-wilderness-areas/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/earth/discussing-the-impact-of-motorized-vehicles-in-wilderness-areas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 13:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E - The Environmental Magazine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthtalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=77240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Destroying what you claim to love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><div id="attachment_77241" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/EarthTalkMotorizedWilderness-300x200.jpg" alt="A key element of the Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act now making its way through Congress would allow motorized vehicles and equipment into wilderness areas, undermine 1964’s Wilderness Act which expressly bans motor vehicles on these last wild vestiges of untrammeled American land. (Comstock)" title="A key element of the Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act now making its way through Congress would allow motorized vehicles and equipment into wilderness areas, undermine 1964’s Wilderness Act which expressly bans motor vehicles on these last wild vestiges of untrammeled American land. (Comstock)" width="300" height="200" class="size-medium wp-image-77241" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A key element of the Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act now making its way through Congress would allow motorized vehicles and equipment into wilderness areas, undermine 1964’s Wilderness Act which expressly bans motor vehicles on these last wild vestiges of untrammeled American land. (Comstock)</p></div></p>
<p>A new bill making its way through Congress, the Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act (H.R. 2834), aims to make federally managed public lands across millions of acres of Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management property more accessible to hunters and anglers. And a key element of the bill calls for allowing motorized vehicles and equipment—as long as they are used for hunting or fishing—into these areas. Leading green groups are outraged because this would undermine 1964’s Wilderness Act which expressly bans motor vehicles on these last wild vestiges of untrammeled American land.</p>
<p>According to the non-profit Wilderness Society, the motorized vehicles provision “would result in the destruction of the very wilderness values that millions of American hunters and anglers cherish.”</p>
<p>“The practical effect could be to open all designated wilderness areas to all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles, motorbikes, motorboats, chainsaws and other motorized vehicles and equipment…” warns Wilderness Society president William Meadows in a letter to Congress. He adds that buildings, towers and temporary roads could even be built in currently pristine stretches of wilderness if the proposed bill becomes law.</p>
<p>But what’s most troubling to Meadows and others is language in the bill saying that “any requirements imposed by [the Wilderness Act] shall be implemented only insofar as they facilitate or enhance the original primary purpose or purposes for which the federal public lands or land unit was established and do not materially interfere with or hinder such purpose or purposes.” Meadows fears this could be construed to allow road building, timber cutting, mining, oil and gas drilling and other development in our remaining wilderness areas.</p>
<p>Another beef environmentalists have with the bill is that it would exempt decisions made or actions taken with regard to hunting and fishing on federal lands from federal environmental review and public disclosure regulations established under 1969’s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Wilderness Society reports that this part of H.R. 2834 would keep the public and concerned parties out of decisions to compromise the integrity of wilderness but also other types of protected lands.</p>
<p>First introduced in the house last September by Michigan Republican Dan Benishek (with 45 bi-partisan co-sponsors), H.R. 2834 made it through the House Natural Resources Committee within three months and is poised for a full House vote later this spring. If it passes there, the Senate will take up a companion version, S. 2066, sponsored by Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski and West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin. Depending on how it plays out, the bill could be on the President’s desk by the summer.</p>
<p>“Recreational fishing and hunting are important and vital recreational activities on our federal public lands,” concludes the Wilderness Society, “but the anti-Wilderness provisions of H.R. 2834 should not be allowed to become law.”</p>
<p><strong>CONTACTS:</strong> H.R. 2834, <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr2834;" target="_blank">www.govtrack.us/congress/<wbr>bills/112/hr2834;</wbr></a> Wilderness Society, <a href="http://www.wilderness.org/" target="_blank">www.wilderness.org</a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/earth/discussing-the-impact-of-motorized-vehicles-in-wilderness-areas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weighing the pros and cons of culling deer herds</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/earth/weighing-the-pros-and-cons-of-culling-deer-herds/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/earth/weighing-the-pros-and-cons-of-culling-deer-herds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 16:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E - The Environmental Magazine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer ticks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ticks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=60615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Striking a balance is hard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><div id="attachment_60616" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/EarthTalkDeer.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/EarthTalkDeer-300x200.jpg" alt="Animal advocacy groups argue that outdated wildlife management guidelines and land management policies contribute to deer overpopulation problems. For one, since hunters mainly prize antlered males, which will mate with multiple females, a resulting ratio of eight females for every male in the wild sets the stage for a population explosion. Pictured: a female white-tailed deer and her fawn. (Media credit/Jupiter Images via Thinkstock)" title="Animal advocacy groups argue that outdated wildlife management guidelines and land management policies contribute to deer overpopulation problems. For one, since hunters mainly prize antlered males, which will mate with multiple females, a resulting ratio of eight females for every male in the wild sets the stage for a population explosion. Pictured: a female white-tailed deer and her fawn. (Media credit/Jupiter Images via Thinkstock)" width="300" height="200" class="size-medium wp-image-60616" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Animal advocacy groups argue that outdated wildlife management guidelines and land management policies contribute to deer overpopulation problems. For one, since hunters mainly prize antlered males, which will mate with multiple females, a resulting ratio of eight females for every male in the wild sets the stage for a population explosion. Pictured: a female white-tailed deer and her fawn. (Media credit/Jupiter Images via Thinkstock)</p></div></p>
<p>It’s hard to believe that  deer, those innocuous enough vegetarian browsers that occasionally tromp  through our backyards, are considered the scourge of many a suburban  neighborhood across the continent. Prior to white settlement of the  “New World,” tens of millions of deer blanketed the continent, but  their population density was kept in check by free-roaming natural predators  such as bears, wolves and mountain lions.</p>
<p>The white man’s rifle took  out the deer’s chief predators and did a number on deer populations  as well; venison was a staple meat on the ever expanding frontier. Biologists  estimate that there were only a half million white-tailed deer left  in the U.S. in the early 1900s due to unregulated hunting. At that point  many states jumped in and began to regulate hunting to try to conserve  fast dwindling resources. The new rules set limits on when hunters could  kill deer and banned hunting females altogether.</p>
<p>In the meantime, many of  the one-time farms in the eastern U.S. began reverting back to forests,  creating a habitat patchwork that in some areas was ideal for deer.  The ensuing rebound of white-tailed deer populations—over 20 million  roam the U.S. today—is viewed as one of the nation’s greatest conservation  success stories, especially since it occurred long before the dawn of  the modern environmental movement.</p>
<p>But there is a dark side  to all this “success.” Too many deer can cause problems for humans,  other wildlife, and even for the deer themselves, who must compete for  dwindling forage sources. “Complaints from residents are often that  the deer are eating things that they have planted,” reports the Missouri  Department of Conservation (MDC). “Well fertilized and watered landscapes  and gardens can be much more desirable to the deer than surrounding  common ground areas that are likely not watered or fertilized.”</p>
<p>Other concerns beyond tearing  up suburban backyards include damage to agricultural crops, deer/car  collisions, transmission of Lyme disease, and the over browsing of habitat  which deer and other wildlife need. “Increasing deer densities through  time can lead residents to a feeling that they have to share too much  with the deer as the damage they do becomes less tolerated,” reports  MDC. It’s at this point that wildlife managers begin considering culling  local herds, usually by tweaking local hunting regulations.</p>
<p>Many animal advocates oppose  such practices. In Defense of Animals (IDA) reports that even permitted  sport hunting, under current wildlife management guidelines and outdated  land management policies, contributes to deer overpopulation problems.  “Currently, there are approximately eight does for every buck in the  wild,” the group explains. “Laws restrict the number of does that  hunters may kill.” Since bucks will often mate with more than one  doe, the ratio of does to bucks “sets the stage for a population explosion.”  And open season on both sexes won’t solve the problem, as too many  does would die, stranding needy fawns and depleting the reproductive  pool—as happened in the early 20th century when deer numbers fell  precipitously low. IDA and many other animal protection organizations  believe that sport hunting should be banned and that deer populations  should be allowed to regulate naturally.</p>
<p>CONTACTS: MDC, <a href="http://www.mdc.mo.gov/" target="_blank">www.mdc.mo.gov</a>;  IDA, <a href="http://www.idausa.org/" target="_blank">www.idausa.org</a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/earth/weighing-the-pros-and-cons-of-culling-deer-herds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wii hunting game announced</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/wii-hunting-game-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/wii-hunting-game-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blast Magazine Newsroom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastiff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=2189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video game publisher Mastiff announced Friday that they are working on brinigng the arcade-style, multi-player hunting series, Deer Drive, to the Wii this fall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Video game publisher <a href="http://www.mastiff-games.com">Mastiff</a> announced Friday that they are working on brinigng the arcade-style, multi-player hunting series, Deer Drive, to the Wii this fall.</p>
<p>&#8220;Deer Drive meshes hunting simulation with arcade style pick-up-and-play action and pacing for an exciting gaming experience. Deer Drive is the first deer hunting game that features two player simultaneous play,&#8221; Mastiff said in a statement. &#8220;Additionally, Deer Drive features a multitude of gameplay modes, including four player party mode, true-to-life sound effects, passive and aggressive prey, and a slew of hunting weapons.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Deer Drive is an entirely different animal when it comes to hunting games,&#8221; said Bill Swartz, &#8220;head woof&#8221; at Mastiff. &#8220;Most hunting games are slow moving simulations with frustrating controls. Deer Drive is all about shooting, all about pick-up-and-play fun and being a more accurate marksman and better hunter than your friends.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Game features:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Arcade-style multiplayer action hunting on Wii for the first time.</li>
<li>Pick-Up-And-Play: Lock, load, and take down some bucks. Just be ready to defend yourself from aggressive mountain lions, bears, charging moose and other dangerous situations.</li>
<li>Multiplayer: Play head-to-head with a friend or with up to four players in Party Mode.</li>
<li>Optimized to work with Wii Remote(tm) or the Wii Zapper accessory.</li>
<li>Changing weather creates dynamic hunting conditions over varied terrain.</li>
<li>Challenging for casual and hard-core players alike.</li>
<li>Ethical hunting integral to the game</li>
</ul>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/wii-hunting-game-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

