<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blast Magazine&#187; chuck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blastmagazine.com/tag/chuck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blastmagazine.com</link>
	<description>Movies, Music, TV, Video Games, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Monday TV Ratings: How I Met Your Mother, House, Chuck hit lows</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/features/monday-tv-ratings-how-i-met-your-mother-house-chuck-hit-lows/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/features/monday-tv-ratings-how-i-met-your-mother-house-chuck-hit-lows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing with the stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how i met your mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=60673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slow night...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Network television continues to limp towards its season finale, as a slew of once popular shows in their later seasons hit or tied series lows.</p>
<p>&#8220;Chuck&#8221; drew a 1.3 in the demo and just over 4 million viewers. It&#8217;s renewal prospects are up in the air given the new management at NBC, and the shocking fact that most of their shows are non-competitive. The fate of &#8220;The Event&#8221; (1.1 demo, 3.7 million) is more certain, as is &#8220;Law and Order: LA&#8221; (1.2 demo, 5 million viewers), as in certain to be canceled in the coming weeks.</p>
<p>CBS has seen its fortunes dwindle on Monday also since the departure of Charlie Sheen, making you wonder if they&#8217;ll demand his return. A &#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8221; repeat scored a 1.7 in the demo, and 6.3 million viewers overall. New eps weren&#8217;t good either for the eye net, &#8220;How I Met Your Mother&#8221; hit a low with a 2.5 in the demo and 6.3 million viewers, while &#8220;Mad Love&#8221; was dismal with a 1.8 in the demo and just over 5 million viewers. Once mighty freshman hit &#8220;Mike and Molly&#8221; suffered (2.2 demo, 7.5 million viewer) and the network that paid more than $2 million for the right to syndicate &#8220;Hawaii 5-0&#8243; might want its money back (2.2 demo, 9 million viewers).</p>
<p>ABC rode &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; to a nightly victory. &#8220;Stars&#8221; averaged a 4.1 in the demo over two hours, and gave a bump to &#8220;Castle,&#8221; which led the 10 pm hour with a 3.1 and 12.6 million viewers.</p>
<p>Over at Fox, just-renewed-&#8221;House&#8221; hit lows as well, drawing a 2.9 in the demo, and 7.7 million viewers. It</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/features/monday-tv-ratings-how-i-met-your-mother-house-chuck-hit-lows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Superman Movie Might Suck</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/features/the-new-superman-movie-might-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/features/the-new-superman-movie-might-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie to me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supernatural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=59013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I'm looking at you Zac Snyder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-59015" title="superman-flying" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/superman-flying.jpg" alt="" width="294" height="222" /></p>
<p>With today&#8217;s Amy Adams casting news, we now have many of the principal actors in the new Superman film, &#8220;Superman: Man of Steel.&#8221;</p>
<p>Diane Lane will play Martha Kent, Kevin Costner will play Jonathan Kent, Adams will play Lois Lane and Henry Cavill will play the title role.</p>
<p>These all sound great, and I&#8217;m excited. Even Cavill, who I&#8217;ve never seen and has a different look than I was anticipating, I&#8217;m giving that a chance.</p>
<p>However, though more important casting looms, such as Perry White and the main villain, the main part that colors this entire film has already been cast: Zac Snyder is directing the movie.</p>
<p>Yeah. Zac Snyder who directed &#8220;300,&#8221; &#8220;Watchmen&#8221; and &#8220;Sucker Punch.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;300&#8243; was awesome action with little else, &#8220;Watchmen&#8221; deteriorated as it went on and I walked out on &#8220;Sucker Punch.&#8221;</p>
<p>And this is the guy directing &#8220;Superman,&#8221; who&#8217;s had no legitimate film in thirty years and is due for a relevant rehash akin to &#8220;Spider-Man&#8221; and &#8220;Batman Begins?&#8221;</p>
<p>Snyder was actually one of the final two in contention to direct the film. Darren Aronofsky was the other. What???? Why did they go with Snyder?</p>
<p>Because the film has to come out next year. Warner Brothers films will lose the rights to the Superman franchise if they don&#8217;t release a Superman film in 2012. When it came down to that , Arronofsky said he couldn&#8217;t make a good film under those deadline constraints.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-59016" title="37th Annual Comic Con International - Day 3" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/zack-snyder-300x239.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="239" /></p>
<p>So from the get-go, Warner Brothers is going with the guy who said &#8220;Sure! I can make SOME KIND OF MOVIE by then.&#8221;</p>
<p>Snyder has proved to have strong visuals and strong action. These likely will give some good elements to the film.</p>
<p>Yet throughout his directing career, Snyder has never had a realistic or relatable character. Not once.</p>
<p>Superman has been on the film back burner because for decades, no director has been able to create a story with him that is compelling, unlike the aforementioned superhero films that drew audiences all across the world in</p>
<p>So Warner Brothers hires the guy who can&#8217;t do characters at all to create a film direly in need of a relatable character.</p>
<p>There are some intangibles. The story was written by David Goyer, the writer of the story for &#8220;Batman Begins&#8221; and &#8220;The Dark Knight.&#8221; And the director of those films, Christopher Nolan, is producing the new Superman film.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s got a solid cast. But is all that enough to overcompensate for the terrible director they have driving the latest Superman vehicle?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/features/the-new-superman-movie-might-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Ratings: Chuck in danger, Castle rises, Dancing topples competition</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-ratings-chuck-in-danger-castle-rises-dancing-topples-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-ratings-chuck-in-danger-castle-rises-dancing-topples-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv renewal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=58862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Chuck headed toward cancellation? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-58863" title="KYM JOHNSON, HINES WARD" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hines-kym.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="327" /></p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/2011-tv-renewalcancellation-scorecard/">These ratings are reflected in the updated TV Renewal/Cancelation Scorecard. </a></p>
<p>The return of &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; sparked a Monday comeback for ABC, providing a much needed late season boost for the network. The 12th season of the dancing competition averaged a 5.3 in the demo over two hours, and more than 22 million viewers. That boosted &#8220;Castle&#8221; to a recent high of a 3.1 in the demo, and more than 12 million viewers.</p>
<p>NBC suffered the most, with all series hitting series lows. While &#8220;The Event&#8221; is virtually guaranteed for cancellation with a 1.2 in the demo, previously &#8220;Harry&#8217;s Law&#8221; and &#8220;Chuck&#8221; had been thought safe; both hit lows, drawing a 1.6 and a 1.5 respectively. While this represents some of the highest programming on NBC&#8217;s slate, what does it keep at those levels? &#8220;Chuck&#8221; a perennial bubble show, is back once more.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Chicago Code&#8221; fell to a series low; it&#8217;s now in danger of cancelation.</p>
<p><strong>8 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Dancing with the Stars (2 Hours): </strong>5.3 demo, 22.6 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>House: </strong>3.4 demo, 9.3 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>How I Met Your Mother: </strong>3.1 demo, 8 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Chuck: </strong>1.5 demo, 4.3 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>*90210: </strong>0.3 demo, .8 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>8:30</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mad Love: </strong>2.4 demo, 6.6 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>9 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>*Two and a Half Men: </strong>2.6 demo, 9.1 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Chicago Code: </strong>1.8 demo, 6.3 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Event: </strong>1.2 demo, 4 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>*Gossip Girl: </strong>0.2 demo, 0.5 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>9:30 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mike &amp; Molly: </strong>3.0 demo, 9.7 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>10 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Castle: </strong>3.1demo, 12.7 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Hawaii Five-0: </strong>2.9 demo, 9.8 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Harry&#8217;s Law: </strong>1.6 demo, 8.2 million viewers</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-ratings-chuck-in-danger-castle-rises-dancing-topples-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Ratings: Chicago Code steady, Chuck in danger</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-ratings-chicago-code-steady-chuck-in-danger/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-ratings-chicago-code-steady-chuck-in-danger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monday ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two and a half men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=58002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC wins the night in the demo, House most-watched]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/2011-tv-renewalcancellation-scorecard/">*Our TV Renewal/Cancellation scorecard has been updated to reflect these ratings!</a></p>
<p>While not exactly a shoe-in for renewal, &#8220;The Chicago Code&#8221; was even with last week with a 2.1 in the 18-49 demo. Given Fox&#8217;s many other woes, that could be enough to earn the show a second season. House was up to a 3.8 rating, leading all shows for the night.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Cape&#8221; aired its season, and most certainly series finale, drawing a 1.1 in the demo. News wasn&#8217;t much better for &#8220;Harry&#8217;s Law&#8221; or &#8220;Chuck,&#8221; which drew a 1.8 and 1.7 respectively. While those would be cancellation-worthy numbers, both remain tossups for survival given NBC&#8217;s overall woes.</p>
<p>ABC led the evening, thanks to a potent one-two punch of &#8220;The Bachelor&#8221; and &#8220;Castle, which led the 10 pm hour.</p>
<p>CBS had a decent night: &#8220;How I Met Your Mother&#8221; was down, while &#8220;Mad Love&#8217;s&#8221; 2.7 demo may put it in danger. Obviously Charlie Sheen&#8217;s antics haven&#8217;t hurt the show; it drew a 3.2 in the demo for a repeat. &#8220;Mike and Molly&#8221; is the bona fide hit of the 2010-2011 season; it increased viewership from a repeat of &#8220;Two a Half Men&#8221; to a 3.4 demo.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really know what to make of the CW. If the entire lineup is equally bad, will they cancel the whole network?</p>
<p>* repeat</p>
<p><strong>8 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>House: </strong>3.8 demo, 11 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>How I Met Your Mother: </strong>3.4 demo, 9.2 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Bachelor (8-10 pm): </strong>3.4 demo, 11.2 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Chuck: </strong>.1.7 demo, 5.3 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>90210: </strong>.7 demo, 1.4 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>8:30</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mad Love: </strong>2.7 demo, 7.9 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>9 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>*Two and A Half Men: </strong>3.2 demo, 11.5 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Chicago Code: </strong>2.1 demo, 8 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Cape: </strong>1.1 demo, 4 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Gossip Girl: </strong>.7 demo, 1.3 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>9:30</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mike and Molly: </strong>3.4 demo, 11.4 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>10 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Castle: </strong>2.8 demo, 10.2 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>*Hawaii Five-O: </strong>1.9 demo, 7.2 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Harry&#8217;s Law: </strong>1.8 demo, 9.1 million viewers</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-ratings-chicago-code-steady-chuck-in-danger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday TV Ratings: Chuck hits season high, The Cape&#8217;s bubble bursts, Lie to Me fades away</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-tv-ratings-chuck-hits-season-high-the-capes-bubble-bursts-lie-to-me-fades-away/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-tv-ratings-chuck-hits-season-high-the-capes-bubble-bursts-lie-to-me-fades-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie to me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=56265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday seems to have a string of soon-to-be cancelled shows, including "The Cape," "Lie to Me," more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>&#8220;Chuck&#8221; returned after a holiday break Monday to register a 2.1 demo rating and 5.8 million viewers, its highest demo point of the season. &#8220;The Cape&#8221; dropped precipitously from its last new episode, from a 2.6 demo to a 1.7 range. It&#8217;s not likely to see a second season with those numbers. &#8220;Harry&#8217;s Law&#8221; debuted to a 2.2 rating. That&#8217;s good for NBC, but does not bode well for a first episode.</p>
<p>&#8220;House&#8221; delivered a 3.6 demo rating, maintaining its relatively poor-performance this season (by its own standards). &#8220;Lie to Me&#8221; had a 1.8 demo rating. That&#8217;s better than last week&#8217;s rock bottom, but still not enough to earn a fourth season. The show has two episodes until its season, and more-than-likely series finale.</p>
<p>CBS won with its typical slate delivering strong points. The eye was the only network to average more than a 3.0 demo&#8211;it averaged a 3.5 last night.</p>
<p><strong>8 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>How I Met Your Mother: </strong>3.9 demo, 10.5 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>House: </strong>3.6 demo, 10.5 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Bachelor </strong>(8-10): 2.7 demo, 8.7 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Chuck: </strong>2.1 demo, 5.8 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>8:30 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Rules of Engagement: </strong>3.2 demo, 9.9 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>9 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Two and a Half Men: </strong>4.6 demo, 15.5 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Lie to Me: </strong>1.8 demo, 5.9 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>The Cape: </strong>1.7 demo, 6.1 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>9:30 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mike and Molly: </strong>3.8 demo, 13 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>10 pm</strong></p>
<p><strong>Hawaii 5-0: </strong>2.9 demo, 10.5 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Harry&#8217;s Law: </strong>2.1 demo, 11 million viewers</p>
<p><strong>Castle (</strong>Repeat<strong>): </strong>1.5 demo, 5.7 million viewers</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/monday-tv-ratings-chuck-hits-season-high-the-capes-bubble-bursts-lie-to-me-fades-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Ratings Monday: The Event and Hawaii drop, Lie to Me in danger?</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-hawaii-drop-lie-to-me-in-danger/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-hawaii-drop-lie-to-me-in-danger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing with the stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii 5-0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how i met your mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie to me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike and Molly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=52213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How far will they drop?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a rel="attachment wp-att-52217" href="http://blastmagazine.com/2010/10/27/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-hawaii-drop-lie-to-me-in-danger/24cf554ea6astle1-jpg/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-52217" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/24cf554ea6astle1.jpg.jpg" alt="" width="272" height="202" /></a>A week after a full season pickup, <strong><em>The Event</em></strong> shrank from a 2.2 to a 2.0 demo rating, with less than 6 million viewers tuning in. <strong><em>Chase </em><span style="font-weight: normal">fell even lower, to a 1.3 demo rating. More people tuned in to Univision than NBC Monday.</span></strong></p>
<p>ABC was the night&#8217;s most watched net in the demo and total viewers. <strong><em>Dancing With the Stars </em><span style="font-weight: normal">attracted a 4.2 demo and 20 million viewers from 8-10 p.m.. </span><em>Castle</em><span style="font-weight: normal"> was the most watched show at 10, with 11.3 million viewers and a 2.9 demo.</span></strong></p>
<p>CBS lost ground, as <strong><em>Hawaii 5-0</em><span style="font-weight: normal"> continued to drop, falling to a 2.8 demo and 10.2 million viewers; it&#8217;s getting low for CBS, while </span><em>Mike and Molly</em><span style="font-weight: normal"> is seeming like the net&#8217;s hit this season.</span></strong></p>
<p>8 pm</p>
<p><strong><em>Dancing with the Stars </em><span style="font-weight: normal">(8-10 pm):</span><em> </em><span style="font-weight: normal">4.2 demo, 20 million viewers</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>How I Met Your Mother: </em><span style="font-weight: normal">3.2 demo, 8.3 million viewers</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Chuck</em>:<span style="font-weight: normal"> 1.9 demo, 5.5 million viewers</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>House </em><span style="font-weight: normal">(Repeat): 1.4 demo, 4 million viewers</span></strong></p>
<p>8:30 pm</p>
<p><strong><em>Rules of Engagement: </em><span style="font-weight: normal">3.0 demo, 8.2 million viewers</span></strong></p>
<p>9 pm</p>
<p><strong><em>Two and a Half Men: <span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">4.3 demo, 13.7 million viewers</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>The Event: <span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">2.0 demo, 5.97 million viewers</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Lie to Me: </em><span style="font-weight: normal">1.6 demo, 4.3 million viewers</span></strong></p>
<p>9:30 pm</p>
<p><strong><em>Mike and Molly: <span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">3.7 demo, 10.8 million viewers</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p>10 pm</p>
<p><strong><em>Castle: <span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">2.9 demo, 11.3 million viewers</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Hawaii 5-0:<span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal"> 2.8 demo, 10.2 million viewers</span></span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Chase: </em><span style="font-weight: normal">1.3 demo, 4.9 million viewers</span></strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-hawaii-drop-lie-to-me-in-danger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Ratings Monday: The Event steady, Hawaii 5-0 drops</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-steady-hawaii-5-0-drops/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-steady-hawaii-5-0-drops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how i met your mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=51308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC wins]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>The same day NBC&#8217;s new mystery series &#8220;The Event&#8221; was picked up for a full season, it held steady from the week before, with 6.4 million viewers and a 2.2 demo rating. That ends the heavy decline it&#8217;s suffered week-to-week this season. &#8220;Chuck&#8221; and &#8220;Chase&#8221; also held from last week, with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; drawing a 1.9 rating and 5.3 million viewers, with &#8220;Chase&#8221; averaging a 1.6 with 5.2 million viewers. NBC was in fourth place for the night.</p>
<p>&#8220;ABC&#8221; was in first, with &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; averaging 19.8 million viewers and a 4.0 rating from 8-10, and &#8220;Castle&#8221; in a close second at 10, with a 2.7 rating and 11.6 million viewers.</p>
<p>CBS was second for the night, with &#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8221; leading the night with 13.4 million viewers and a 4.3 demo rating. At 8, &#8220;How I Met Your Mother&#8221; was down with a 3.2 rating and 8 million viewers. &#8220;Rules of Engagement&#8221; was low with a 2.9 rating and 7.8 million viewers. At 9:30, &#8220;Mike and Molly&#8221; held up, with a 3.4 rating and 11 million viewers, but &#8220;Hawaii 5-0&#8243; dropped under a 3 with a 2.9 rating and 10.6 million viewers.</p>
<p>&#8220;House&#8221; was strong for Fox with a 3.5 rating and 9.5 million viewers, but &#8220;Lie to Me&#8221; was low, with a 2.0 rating and 5.7 million viewers.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-steady-hawaii-5-0-drops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC announces full season for The Event</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/nbc-announces-full-season-for-the-event-more-chuck-close/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/nbc-announces-full-season-for-the-event-more-chuck-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Order: LA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=51262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Event, Outsourced, Law and Order: LA, Chuck close]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-51263" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/the-event-nbc-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p>NBC has announced full season pick-ups for &#8220;The Event,&#8221; &#8220;Outsourced,&#8221; &#8220;Law and Order: LA,&#8221; and a potential announcement regarding &#8220;Chuck&#8221; is imminent. Most rookie shows start off with a 13 episode order, and are increased with a back nine pickup, like these three.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Event&#8221; started off the season with 11.1 million viewers and a strong 3.6 demo rating; in its most recent outing it scored a 2.2 rating and just  6.5 million viewers. A full season pickup is good, but these numbers don&#8217;t scream the second coming of &#8220;Lost&#8221; like NBC had hoped.</p>
<p>&#8220;Outsourced&#8221; has been steady for NBC, though also started out much stronger. It recently scored a 2.5 rating and 5.2 million viewers, though started off the season with a 3.6 and 7.5 million viewers. It has the plus of being the leadout of &#8220;The Office,&#8221; NBC&#8217;s number 1 scripted show.</p>
<p>&#8220;Law and Order: LA&#8221; also started out very strong, with a 3.1 rating and 10 million viewers. In just a few outings, its dropped steeply to a 1.9 rating and 7.2 million viewers.</p>
<p>According to multiple outlets, &#8220;Chuck&#8221; is very close to having a full-season order.</p>
<p>When renewed by NBC in May of this year, the show was renewed for a 13-episode fourth season,. However, after maintaining consistent ratings&#8211;around 5.3 million viewers and a 1.9 rating&#8211;throughout the season, NBC is on the verge of filling out the order with a back 9.</p>
<p>&#8220;Chuck&#8221; has remained constant, despite wild drops in ratings from the rest of the Monday night shows, &#8220;Chase&#8221; and &#8220;The Event.&#8221; And since the show is in its fourth season, there&#8217;s less of a concern of big year-to-year declines, inherent in freshman shows.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/nbc-announces-full-season-for-the-event-more-chuck-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Ratings Monday: The Event and Chase done, Lie to Me in danger</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-chase-done-lie-to-me-in-danger/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-chase-done-lie-to-me-in-danger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing with the stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie to me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two and a half men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=50747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House, Dancing with the Stars win night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>ABC won Monday night with the 1-2 punch of &#8220;Dancing with the Stars&#8221; and &#8220;Castle.&#8221; From 8-10, &#8220;Dancing&#8221; averaged 19.7 million viewers and a 4.2 rating, to lead the night. &#8220;Castle&#8221; logged good numbers at 10, with a 3.1 rating and 12 million viewers.</p>
<p>NBC was in fourth for the night, and its Monday night slate keeps getting worse; cancellation looms for &#8220;Lost&#8221; wannabe &#8220;The Event,&#8221; which drew only 6.5 million viewers and a 2.2 rating, and &#8220;Chase,&#8221; which fell to a 1.5 rating and 5 million viewers. &#8220;Chuck &#8221; is also on its last legs, with a 1.9 rating and 5.3 million viewers and 8.</p>
<p>CBS had a good night for second place. At 8, &#8220;How I Met Your Mother&#8221; averaged 8.5 million viewers and a 3.4 rating, while &#8220;Rules of Engagement&#8221; drew 8 million viewers and a 3.0 rating at 8:30. &#8220;Two and A Half Men&#8221; was still Monday&#8217;s top scripted show, with 13.2 million viewers and a 4.3 rating. &#8220;Mike and Molly&#8221; stayed strong with a 3.5 rating and 10.7 million viewers. &#8220;Hawaii 5-0&#8243; fell a little bit, drawing 10.5 million viewers and a 3.1 rating, to tie for first at 10.</p>
<p>&#8220;House&#8221; was typically strong for Fox, with a 3.6 rating and 9.5 million viewers, but the network was again brought down by &#8220;Lie to Me,&#8221; which fell to just under a 2.0 rating and 5.5 million viewers&#8211;a sure sign the show is in trouble.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv-ratings-monday-the-event-and-chase-done-lie-to-me-in-danger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday TV Ratings: The Event continues crashing, ABC wins</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/monday-tv-ratings-the-event-continues-crashing-abc-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/monday-tv-ratings-the-event-continues-crashing-abc-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing with the stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike and Molly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=50374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC's ratings woes continue, Lie to Me debuts poor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Start the cancellation watch for &#8220;The Event.&#8221; The show dropped another 20% in the 18-49 demo, dropping to a 2.4 rating, and 7.4 million viewers. Sorry fans, this isn&#8217;t the next &#8220;Lost,&#8221; and don&#8217;t expect it to stick around very long. The rest of NBC&#8217;s Monday slate was pretty weak as well, with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; in fourth at 8, pulling a 1.9 rating and 5.8 million viewers. &#8220;Chase&#8221; looks likely to go first though, dropping to a 1.7 rating and 5.8 million viewers.</p>
<p>ABC won the night, led by &#8220;Dancing with the Stars.&#8221; From 8-10, the reality show averaged a 4.4 rating and 20.1 million viewers. Castle was second at 10, with a 3.0 rating and 12 million viewers.</p>
<p>CBS was second for the night. At 8, &#8220;How I Met Your Mother&#8221; dipped a bit to a 3.4 rating and 8.5 million viewers. &#8220;Rules of Engagement&#8221; drew 8.4 million viewers and a 3.0 rating at 8:30. &#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8221; was the top scripted show of the night, drawing 14.2 million viewers and a 4.5 rating at 9. Lead-out &#8220;Mike and Molly&#8221; is officially a hit; it held 12.2 million viewers and a 3.8 rating. &#8220;Hawaii Five-0&#8243; is also a bonafide hit; it drew 12 million viewers and a 3.5 rating.</p>
<p>Fox was anchored by &#8220;House&#8221; at 8, which was typically strong with a 3.9 rating and 10.5 million viewers. &#8220;Lie to Me&#8221; dragged the network down at 9 however, drawing a 2.2 rating and 5.9 million viewers in its season premiere, replacing the now cancelled &#8220;Lone Star.&#8221; If it continues to lose more than 40% of &#8220;House&#8217;s&#8221; lead-in, &#8220;Lie to Me&#8221; looks endangered as well.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/monday-tv-ratings-the-event-continues-crashing-abc-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Ratings: The Event falls, few watch Lone Star, Two and Half Men on top</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv-ratings-the-event-falls-few-watch-lone-star-two-and-half-men-on-top/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv-ratings-the-event-falls-few-watch-lone-star-two-and-half-men-on-top/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Woods</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lone Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two and Half Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=49804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC's attempt to recreate "Lost" isn't succeeding ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>After a moderately successful premiere, &#8220;The Event&#8221; suffered a 20% weekly viewership decline to a 2.9 rating and 8.9 million viewers. A show clearly modeled after &#8220;Lost,&#8221; this is not a good sign. The show&#8217;s already dropping into low-rated territory, and serialized shows that require weekly viewing generally fall faster than most. &#8220;The Event&#8221; is beginning to seem like the latest in a long-line of &#8220;Lost&#8221; knockoffs cancelled in its first season.</p>
<p>NBC didn&#8217;t receive much better news for its other Monday night shows. &#8220;Chuck&#8221; fell from a 2.1 to a 1.9 rating and 5.5 million viewers. After four seasons of escaping cancellation, this may be the end of the line. At 10 p.m., &#8220;Chase&#8221; also declined to a 2.1 rating and 6.3 million viewers, good for last place in the hour, indicating a short lifeline.</p>
<p>CBS saw a mixed bag of rises and declines, but overall delivered a solid night. &#8220;How I Met Your Mother&#8221; rose to a 3.8 rating and 8.9 million viewers, bringing up &#8220;Rules of Engagement&#8221; to a 3.2 rating and 8.1 million viewers. &#8220;Two and a Half Men&#8221; pulled in a 4.8 rating and 13.9 million, while &#8220;Mike and Molly&#8221; slipped at bit to a 3.7 rating and 11.2 million viewers. &#8220;Hawaii Five-0&#8243; dropped a few tenths to a 3.5 rating and 12.3 million viewers.</p>
<p>Fox rode its reliable workhorse &#8220;House&#8221; to a 3.8 rating and 10 million viewers, thought that was down 10% from last week. At 9 p.m., &#8220;Lone Star&#8221; fell to a 1.0 rating and 3.7 million. It&#8217;s now competing with the &#8220;Whole Truth&#8221; and &#8220;Outlaw&#8221; for the first show cancelled in the new broadcast season.</p>
<p>ABC scored a 4.8 rating and 22 million viewers from &#8220;Dancing with the Stars,&#8221; and at 10 p.m, &#8220;Castle&#8221; lured in a 3.2 rating and 12.2 million.</p>
<p>Several shows that aired last night featured overruns, while some markets aired the Monday Night Football Game. Both of these will be later  stripped from shows affected, so numbers may rise and fall later in the week.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv-ratings-the-event-falls-few-watch-lone-star-two-and-half-men-on-top/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2010: Blast interviews Vik Sahay about &#8220;Chuck&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/comic-con-2010-blast-interviews-vik-sahay-about-chuck/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/comic-con-2010-blast-interviews-vik-sahay-about-chuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conception Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blast West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blast Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Page One Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic-con]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic Con 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vik sahay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=47785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the fate of Buy More?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>SAN DIEGO &#8212; The landscape of television serials is somewhat of a tight rope act.  Between the strains of competitive time slot schedules, and pilot series pick ups, even the most critically acclaimed series can be dropped unexpectedly. NBC&#8217;s series, &quot;Chuck&quot; has managed to weather all the trappings of cancellation with its witty dialogue, fun cast of characters, and cult like following from both viewers and critics alike.</p>
<p>As season three wrapped up in May, the sobering finale left plenty of questions up in the air. One of them being the fate of Buy More (a parody of the Best Buy electronics store) and its tech support crew (the Nerd Herd). Vik Sahay plays Nerd Herd Lester Patel, a techie who specializes in Apple products. Lester&#8217;s storylines generally bring the more humorous side of the series between cage fights with his best friend Jeff to collaborating on their band conveniently named: Jeffster.</p>
<p>Blast recently sat down with Vik Sahay to talk about his work on &quot;Chuck&quot; and what it means to play a diverse character like Lester Patel during his visit to the San Diego Comic-Con 2010.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Right now the Buy More is no more. And we love Lester&#8211; </strong></p>
<p><strong>VIK SAHAY:</strong> Do we?</p>
<p><strong>BLAST:  We do! (laughs) If you were hypothetically, in your opinion, envision your character coming back into the game, how would it happen?</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> I think, this all hypothetical, and this is just me imagining it. I think Lester should come back into the game as a true, dark, and evil rival to Chuck. I think he should get recruited by The Ring, and planted back in to that world as a counterspy.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: No one would expect that, I think.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/D3_20090507_165035gallery.jpg" rel="lightbox[47785]" title="D3_20090507_165035gallery"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/D3_20090507_165035gallery-199x300.jpg" alt="" title="D3_20090507_165035gallery" width="199" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-47788" /></a><strong>VS:</strong> Yeah, and he&#8217;s already got this thing about him where he doesn&#8217;t like Chuck. So I think he would be easily convinced and we could really bring out that dark side.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: There&#8217;s the music of Jeffster (Lester&#8217;s band with best friend Jeff,) they&#8217;re huge amongst fans of the show. There&#8217;s as much a cult following for them as much as the show.</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> Really? Is that true?</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Actually, apart from fans of the show itself (who love Chuck and the spy world,) we got a lot of comments about Jeffster.</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> That&#8217;s amazing.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Did you ever expect the Jeffster moments to be as popular and go this far?</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> No, not at all. I mean my goal was to get through the singing, but it was important for meâ€¦for Jeffster to be an extension of what Lester was (on the show.) I think maybe, it&#8217;s connecting (with fans) in a way because he&#8217;s such a train wreck. This is his outlet for his rage and anger; he sings the way he does because of thatâ€¦he gets to pour all that madness into (Jeffster.) So it&#8217;s interesting to use Jeffster through the character of Lester in that way.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: So what about Lester in love? Anything romantic for him?</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> Well, he&#8217;s on the lamb as it stands (right now.) So maybe out thereâ€¦either his root chakra will open up (and we&#8217;ll see that evil side;) or his heart chakraâ€¦(laughs) I think what he wants most out of life is unconditional love. He&#8217;s a broken boy, so the way he goes about it is that he&#8217;s like a rattlesnakeâ€¦but I wonder what would happen, and what that woman would be &#8212; who would love him.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Lester plays in shades of grey on the show, he&#8217;s a complicated character.</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> Yeah, I think one of the things I try and put out there about him is that he&#8217;s very complex; his emotions. It&#8217;s not just bad, good, bad, goodâ€¦I think if what he wants is unconditional love, then who he is the scorpionâ€¦in the scorpion and the frog fable. He&#8217;s like please get me across this river, to the frog on the lily pad; (the frog) is like &quot;noâ€¦you&#8217;re going to bite me.&quot; And (the scorpion) is like &quot;no I promise.&quot; He can be very sweet. Then halfway through he (the scorpion) bitesâ€¦and when you ask him why, (the scorpion) says, &quot;Because it&#8217;s in my nature.&quot; So that&#8217;s how I see (Lester) as the scorpion, but it&#8217;s complicated.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: It&#8217;s also interesting that for Lester he comes from such a diverse background. How did you feel about the script and the Lester character when you first got the script? As an Asian actor, you&#8217;ve most likely have been offered a wide range of roles.</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> What I loved about it is that the character is undefined; his name is Lesterâ€¦so there was no forethought in casting. I think when I was cast they (didn&#8217;t consider it.) They were colorblind about it, which is great! Then they put part of his background in itâ€¦being Indian even though they&#8217;ve written some Jewish stuff which I love! I love it; I have no problem playing Indian or anything like that at all. I like it, I like exploring it; it&#8217;s actually good for me as an actor to think to my roots and connect that way.</p>
<p>I like that he&#8217;s (Lester) isn&#8217;t overly sweet, or obviously nerdy. I like that he kind of has that wild side.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: The Asian community can at times be sensitive to the way they&#8217;re represented onscreen, were there ever moments when you&#8217;ve gotten a script and felt uncomfortable about the direction?</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> On the show &quot;Chuck&quot; it&#8217;s never been really a concern. There&#8217;s nothing that&#8217;s been on where I&#8217;ve said no. In fact, I am trying to; I want to add elements about his ethnicities (Indian and Jewish) to the show. Obviously, I&#8217;d be most protective of the Indian side of Lester. (The show) has played up his Jewish side, and they use it to their own discretion.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Maybe they&#8217;ll bring it (his Indian side) up more?</strong></p>
<p><strong>VS:</strong> I hope so too. I want to explore that more. I don&#8217;t want to do anything that&#8217;s facile or thin. As long as it&#8217;s a full character that&#8217;s there? I&#8217;m very happy to play his ethnicity.</p>
<p>F<em>ans of the series can find Vik Sahay along with castmates:  Zachary Levi, Yvonne Strahovski, Adam Baldwin, Joshua Gomez, Sarah Lancaster, Irving Bartowski, Ryan McPartlin, Mark Christopher Lawrence, Scott Krinsky, and Julia Ling return this fall at the usual Monday 8/7C on NBC with its fourth season premiere September 20th .</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/comic-con-2010-blast-interviews-vik-sahay-about-chuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Notebook: 1/8/10</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-notebook/tv-notebook-1810-simpsons-450th-episod/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-notebook/tv-notebook-1810-simpsons-450th-episod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blast Magazine Newsroom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conan o'brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=36732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big weekend coming up!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/simpsons-logo-300x133.png" alt="" title="simpsons logo" width="300" height="133" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-34425" />Tonight is the season premiere of &#8220;What Not To Wear&#8221; on TLC at 9 p.m., but it&#8217;s the weekend that has us excited. </p>
<p>On Sunday, NBC as the premiere of &#8220;Chuck&#8221; at 9, so be sure to DVR the HBO season premiere of &#8220;Big Love&#8221; at the same time. History Channel has premieres of &#8220;Ax Men&#8221; at 9 also, as well as &#8220;Madhouse&#8221; at 10. If you are still looking for something, National Geographic Channel has the season premiere of &#8220;Border Wars&#8221; also at 9.</p>
<p>Sunday is also a big day for FOX with the 450th episode of &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; at 8 p.m. followed by the &#8220;Simpsons 20th Anniversary Special: In 3D! On Ice!&#8221; at 8:30.</p>
<p>In less happy, less 3D and maybe not less on ice news, NBC execs have reportedly met with Jay Leno and Conan O&#8217;Brien about their abysmal ratings. TMZ suggests NBC might cancel Leno&#8217;s 10 p.m. show and return him to &#8220;The Tonight Show,&#8221; firing O&#8217;Brien. NBC has gone on the record saying they support both shows in their current formats, but the network admitted that Leno&#8217;s poor ratings are hurting affiliates&#8217; 11 p.m. newscasts.</p>
<p>Finally, CBS announced its midseason schedule. Jerry Bruckheimer&#8217;s new drama &#8220;Miami Medical&#8221; will air Fridays at 10 p.m starting April 2. &#8220;Accidentally on Purpose&#8221; moves to Wednesday at 8:30 p.m. starting March 31. &#8220;Rules of Engagement&#8221; begins its fourth season March 1 at 8:30 p.m, and 24 former castmates will return for the 20th edition of &#8220;Survivor&#8221; called &#8220;Heroes vs. Villains.&#8221; The two-hour premiere is February 11 at 8 p.m. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-notebook/tv-notebook-1810-simpsons-450th-episod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Notebook: 10/30/09</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-notebook/tv-notebook-103009-trauma-canceled/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-notebook/tv-notebook-103009-trauma-canceled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blast Magazine Newsroom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV Notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[being human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr. drew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syfy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trauma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=32231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Pit Bulls" on Animal Planet and "Trauma" is off at NBC]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>&#8220;Pit Bulls and Parolees&#8221; premieres tonight at 10 on Animal Planet. On Sunday, look for Dr. Drew&#8217;s sex rehab show on VH1 at 10 p.m., and another reality program, &#8220;Styl&#8217;d&#8221; to start off on MTV at the same time.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/trauma_7_gallery_primary.jpg" rel="lightbox[32231]" title="trauma_7_gallery_primary"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/trauma_7_gallery_primary-300x224.jpg" alt="trauma_7_gallery_primary" title="trauma_7_gallery_primary" width="300" height="224" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-32233" /></a>NBC is canceling its brand new drama, &#8220;Trauma,&#8221; with the production stopping after the initial 13-episode order. NBC has not said whether or not it will even air the remaining episodes. NBC did order six new mid-season episodes of &#8220;<a href="/tag/chuck">Chuck</a>,&#8221; so it&#8217;s not all bad news. This expands the season to 19 episodes. &#8220;Chuck&#8221; was originally going to open after the Winter Olympics, but it may come sooner. </p>
<p>ABC announced that &#8220;Scrubs&#8221; will premiere with two episodes on December 1 at 9 p.m. The regular time period will be Tuesdays at 9. &#8220;Better Off Ted&#8221; will premiere December 8, and will regularly follow &#8220;Scrubs&#8221; at 9:30.</p>
<p><a href="/tag/syfy">Syfy</a> ordered 13 new episodes of &#8220;Being Human,&#8221; an American port of a British series based on three roomates &#8212; a ghost, vampire and werewolf &#8212; who lead double lives. The show will premiere in the summer.</p>
<p>Finally on this Friday, we know that NBC is working on a &#8220;Monk&#8221; ripoff with a few twists. Variety reported that a washed up magician with agoraphobia will be approached by an elite law enforcement group to use his talents to solve the hard cases.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/tv/tv-notebook/tv-notebook-103009-trauma-canceled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Mark Christopher Lawrence, Chuck&#8217;s Big Mike</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-mark-christopher-lawrence-chucks-big-mike/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-mark-christopher-lawrence-chucks-big-mike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big mike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark christopher lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vik sahay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He says he would win in a fight with Tony Hale, hands down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>SAN DIEGO &#8220;&quot; The last &#8220;Chuck&#8221; fans saw of Big Mike, the ousted manager of the Buy More, he was stuck doing dirty work for Tony Hale&#8217;s Emmett Milbarge to the point that Joshua Gomez&#8217;s Morgan Grimes quit the Buy More. Mark Christopher Lawrence sat down with Blast to talk about how he hopes season three picks up for Big Mike&#8217;s story.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well Big Mike has to get his job back first, because right now he&#8217;s got a green shirt&#8221; said Lawrence of the Buy More storyline. &#8220;I mean clearly he&#8217;s got to take Emmett down, so we&#8217;ve got to set that up, so I&#8217;m looking forward to the first few episodes to see how that works out.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m just hoping that there&#8217;s a slow, painful death for Emmett&#8221; he added with a laugh.</p>
<p>When asked who would win in a fight, him or Tony Hale, Lawrence replied immediately, &#8220;Tony Hale wouldn&#8217;t have a chance. I&#8217;m thinking he&#8217;s screaming, crying. He wouldn&#8217;t want a (wrestling match). I was second in California &#8220;&quot; twice.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for what else he would like to see in season three, Lawrence said he&#8217;d like to see what&#8217;s new in Big Mike&#8217;s love life.</p>
<p>&#8220;Morgan is uncomfortable&#8221; said Lawrence of the relationship Big Mike had been having with Morgan&#8217;s mom, played by Patricia Rae. &#8220;Of course, if my mom was in the next room with one guy who&#8217;s her boyfriend, I&#8217;d sleep in the car before I listened to that (laughs). Yeah so I don&#8217;t know, she did catch the bouquet at the wedding, so there&#8217;s the possibility that she&#8217;ll be around for a while, and she&#8217;s really funny. They really haven&#8217;t given her enough to do so you can really see how funny she is. It could be pretty cool.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lawrence was still giddy from the Jeffster performance he had just seen on stage. In &#8220;Chuck&#8221; Lawrence plays the manager of Vik Sahay and Scott Krinsky&#8217;s characters, Lester and Jeff.</p>
<p>&#8220;(The performance) did make me want to get up and dance&#8221; said Lawrence. &#8220;It&#8217;s so funny because Vik is so different outside of that character. It is amazing to see his transformation. (&#8220;¦) I&#8217;m going to try to talk them into opening for me on tour.&#8221;</p>
<p>In &#8220;Chuck&#8221; Big Mike has a giant swordfish figurine which he loves that has played a significant role in several episodes. Lawrence said he does have a giant swordfish figurine himself, but it doesn&#8217;t have a place in his home.</p>
<p>&#8220;Here&#8217;s the funny thing though&#8221; he said. &#8220;I was in Tommy Bahama&#8217;s and one of the guys that works there, he&#8217;s a fan of the show, and he goes, &#8220;ËœHey, in our other store we&#8217;ve got a bunch of stuff that we&#8217;re throwing away and one of them is a copper silhouette of a swordfish. I&#8217;ll get it for you!&#8217; I was like, &#8220;ËœWell how big is it?&#8217; He&#8217;s like, &#8220;ËœI don&#8217;t know, about seven feet?&#8217; I was like, &#8220;ËœNo, that&#8217;s alright. My wife is not going to go for a big copper swordfish in the house.&#8217; Baby, I think we&#8217;ll put it right over the bed, it&#8217;ll be alright (laughs).&#8221;</p>
<p>Now going into its third season, the fan following for &#8220;Chuck&#8221; has taken on a life of its own.</p>
<p>&#8220;After I saw the pilot, I thought, wow, this show could be huge. It&#8217;s the first time I&#8217;ve been on a show where I thought, this show has legs&#8221; said Lawrence of the popularity of &#8220;Chuck. &#8220;I didn&#8217;t know what to expect (after the pilot). It&#8217;s like you look at this type of material and it&#8217;s the opportunities are limitless because what&#8217;s going on in the world you can tie right into stuff that is happening now, or you can make stuff up. And I think they do a good job of doing a little bit of both.&#8221;</p>
<p>With Krinsky and Sahay giving interviews together after the Jeffster performance, and Zachary Levi having confessed the Joshua Gomez, who plays his onscreen best friend Morgan, is his best friend in real life, it was clear that there was a lot of love going around between the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; cast.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s the only time I&#8217;ve worked on a show with a cast this large, and one of the few times that I&#8217;ve worked with a cast that everybody gets along&#8221; said Lawrence. &#8220;Because, you know, there&#8217;s a lot of ego in Hollywood, and everybody&#8217;s ego is bigger than the next, so it&#8217;s great to be able to go to work and do what you do with people that you love to work with, and with people that you love outside of work, so it&#8217;s pretty cool.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lawrence said he is finally beginning to get recognition for his role as Big Mike.</p>
<p>&#8220;In LA people see stars all the time so it&#8217;s no big deal, but being down here, I get stopped a little more often because of &#8220;ËœChuck.&#8217; (&#8220;¦) But now (people say), &#8220;ËœHey, it&#8217;s Big Mike!&#8217; or people go, &#8220;ËœThat&#8217;s the dude!&#8217; So that&#8217;s kind of odd. But life goes on&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>As for whether he fits in to the nerd-friendly tone of the show, Lawrence said the answer was a definitive yes.</p>
<p>&#8220;I went to USC on a debate scholarship, so (laughs) so I think I qualify as a nerd&#8221; he said.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-mark-christopher-lawrence-chucks-big-mike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Vik Sahay and Scott Krinsky talk Jeffster</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-vik-sahay-and-scott-krinsky-talk-jeffster/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-vik-sahay-and-scott-krinsky-talk-jeffster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott krinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vik sahay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the video of Jeffster performing live!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>SAN DIEGO &#8220;&quot; Hot from their first live performance as Jeffster, Vik Sahay and Scott Krinsky sat down with Blast to talk about their bizarre characters, what will happen with the Buy More and the future of Jeffster.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jMTkETwNP2U" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></p>
<p><strong>On taking Jeffster to the next level</strong></p>
<p>SCOTT KRINSKY: Of course, with like a world tour, you know?<br />
<strong><br />
On Jeffster music videos</strong></p>
<p>SK: I haven&#8217;t heard about doing some videos yet, but it sounds like a very good idea.</p>
<p><strong>On covers they would like to perform</strong></p>
<p>SK: I&#8217;d love to do some Journey.</p>
<p>VIK SAHAY: Yeah, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Stop.&#8221; I would say &#8220;Don&#8217;t Stop Believing.&#8221; Although, you know, all of this, I would have to sing this stuff, and that is a nightmare for myself and for everybody listening. It&#8217;s impossible for me to pick songs, although I did pick ["Fat Bottomed Girls"].</p>
<p><strong>On the origin of Jeffster</strong></p>
<p>VS: I think it&#8217;s my rock star vibe that gave that idea to the writers. We were approached, we jumped, we bit. I was afraid. (My first response was) terror. Utter, utter terror. The singing (was the scariest), because I was like yeah, great idea, more for us to do&#8221;¦ wait a minute, I have to sing these songs.</p>
<p>SK: And I have to fake playing them. I am not a musician so, I hope I pulled it off.</p>
<div id="attachment_21225" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jeffster.jpg" rel="lightbox[21223]" title="jeffster"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jeffster-300x205.jpg" alt="(from left) Scott Krinsky and Vik Sahay" title="jeffster" width="300" height="205" class="size-medium wp-image-21225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(from left) Scott Krinsky and Vik Sahay</p></div>
<p><strong>On Scott Krinsky&#8217;s similarity to Jeff</strong></p>
<p>SK: I&#8217;m not a big gamer. I love the old school games, so the Missile Command, Galaga, Ms. Pac-man, Donkey Kong. Very old school.</p>
<p><strong>On the future of the Buy More:</strong></p>
<p>VS: You tell us.</p>
<p>SK: We know nothing.</p>
<p>VS: What did (Chris Fedak and Josh Schwartz) tell you when they came by?</p>
<p>SK: Do you think they tell us these things?</p>
<p>VS: Zero. You tell me what they said when they came by.</p>
<p>SK: I, like you, was hoping to learn something up there (at the panel) about what I am going to do.</p>
<p>VS: We were all listening.</p>
<p><strong>On the &#8220;Indian lesbian&#8221; line used to describe Lester in an episode</strong></p>
<p>VS: I died a little inside when I read that. You know but what I do realize is that when you&#8217;re a masculine, Harrison Ford type like I am, what they&#8217;re playing with is the comedy of opposites, clearly. Ah, yes. Is (an Indian lesbian) what I look like?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-vik-sahay-and-scott-krinsky-talk-jeffster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Ryan McPartlin, Chuck&#8217;s Captain Awesome</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-ryan-mcpartlin-chucks-captain-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-ryan-mcpartlin-chucks-captain-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captain awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joshua gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan mcpartlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah lancaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan tells him how "awesome" "Chuck" is going.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/55776641bmediaventures7262009104227PM.jpg" rel="lightbox[21168]" title="In this file photo, Ryan McPartlin arrives at NBC&#039;s Fall Premiere Party at Boulevard 3 on September 18, 2008 in Los Angeles (Media credit/WireImage)"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/55776641bmediaventures7262009104227PM-192x300.jpg" alt="In this file photo, Ryan McPartlin arrives at NBC&#039;s Fall Premiere Party at Boulevard 3 on September 18, 2008 in Los Angeles (Media credit/WireImage)" title="In this file photo, Ryan McPartlin arrives at NBC&#039;s Fall Premiere Party at Boulevard 3 on September 18, 2008 in Los Angeles (Media credit/WireImage)" width="192" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-21182" /></a>SAN DIEGO &#8212; In NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Chuck,&#8221; Ryan McPartlin&#8217;s Devon Woodcomb is more than just a secondary character, he&#8217;s &#8220;awesome.&#8221; As the newest member of Chuck&#8217;s family (he married Chuck&#8217;s sister Ellie in the second season&#8217;s finale), Devon went from being the often joked about &#8220;Captain Awesome&#8221; who lived with Ellie and Chuck to an integral part of the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; family. Blast got a chance to chat with McPartlin, who is just as awesome in the flesh, during the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; press room at Comic-Con.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: How are you doing?</strong></p>
<p>RYAN MCPARTLIN: Awesome. Awesome. I am doing great.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: I think it&#8217;s about time Awesome needs to get his own superhero symbol.</strong></p>
<p>RM: You know what&#8217;s funny, is there were t-shirts made on, I think it was Cafƒ©Press.com or something, they started a year ago, it&#8217;s a lightning bolt. A yellow lightning bolt with a baby blue t-shirt and &#8220;Captain Awesome&#8221; across it. Of course, I had to buy a few for my friends. I can&#8217;t personally wear them; I should, but I can&#8217;t personally wear them because just in fear of being too tacky and not being awesome, because I don&#8217;t think you wear that you&#8217;re awesome if you are awesome. But I don&#8217;t know who&#8217;s getting money off that because we&#8217;re not.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST:  Do you ever get that where people see you and then just go, &#8220;Awesome!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>RM: Actually, I was auditioning for something else, the first season, I remember being on the street thinking I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going to happen with this &#8220;Chuck&#8221; show and there was some movie I was going in for and I just hear, &#8220;Awesome, we effin&#8217; love you!&#8221; and I look around and go, &#8220;Oh my god&#8221; and that was kind of the first moment for me to go, this might be catching on here. The fans are coming out, they&#8217;re just screaming &#8220;Awesome!&#8221; And now it&#8217;s become, I&#8217;d say a few times a day I just get stopped, like, &#8220;You know, I don&#8217;t want to say&#8221; or &#8220;I didn&#8217;t want to bother you&#8221; or something, but I always love being bothered, I don&#8217;t care, at dinner, if they watch the show I&#8217;m a fan of theirs if they&#8217;re a fan of ours, you know, whenever somebody comes up and they go, &#8220;We love the show, it&#8217;s awesome&#8221; and then they catch themselves saying awesome, and they go, &#8220;Oh, well it&#8217;s not&#8221;¦ well yeah, it&#8217;s awes&#8221;¦ but&#8221; and I&#8217;m like, &#8220;It&#8217;s okay, I know, I use it all the time, don&#8217;t worry about it.&#8221; But yeah, there&#8217;s people coming out of the woodwork now. It&#8217;s fun. </p>
<p><strong>BLAST: It&#8217;s kind of funny how it developed from being an inside joke on the show to that basically being your name now.</strong></p>
<p>RM: What&#8217;s funny is they never establish it. The writers will sometimes write themselves into a corner or not really realize the rules they&#8217;ve created for the world. And I remember like the second episode or the third episode I said, &#8220;Hey guys, I&#8217;m being called Captain Awesome, and I&#8217;m in the room and I can hear them calling me Captain Awesome. Is this intentional? Like, do I know I&#8217;m being called Captain Awesome or is this like a dig on me?&#8221; And then I remember Schwartz and Fedak look at each other and go, &#8220;Good question.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know. Here&#8217;s the deal: I think I know, and maybe they think it&#8217;s a little big of a dig. I think it&#8217;s flattering. I think it&#8217;s something like a great nickname, and that&#8217;s how I&#8217;m going to play it. And that&#8217;s always how I&#8217;ve played it and it just went from this small little two-dimensional character to now being a really significant part of the show. That&#8217;s so exciting for me. Like I said, I didn&#8217;t know what was going to happen with this. First episode I was like, I don&#8217;t know, this little part, I say awesome a couple of times, I take my shirt off, and I leave. And now it&#8217;s become this essential character that&#8217;s so fun for me and the cast.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: You&#8217;re actually the only person in Chuck&#8217;s personal life who knows about the spy world.</strong></p>
<p>RM: I&#8217;m like Chuck in the first season now. I have to carry that weight of knowing his secret and keeping the home life intact. So it&#8217;s kind of a great part for them, because there&#8217;s only so much they can do with that before the fans become exhausted with Chuck carrying that weight and doing it. Now to see Awesome and how he&#8217;ll react and how all the people around him will react to that, it&#8217;s a whole new life for the show and that storyline itself because it&#8217;s such a fun thing. My favorite part of any superhero movie is the first act when they find out what their power is but can&#8217;t let anybody know. The third act is always disappointing in every superhero movie compared to the first act. And I feel like I get to carry that first act again that Chuck got in the first season.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Do you think he can handle that weight?</strong></p>
<p>RM: Oh, I don&#8217;t think so (laughs). I used to get to phone it in; come in, say &#8220;awesome&#8221; a few times, take my shirt off, do a few crunches-</p>
<p>JOSH GOMEZ: Do you ever stop? My god!</p>
<p>RM: [laughs] And then he takes his shirt off and I stand next to him and it&#8217;s fine. And then it got to the second season and I looked at the script and thought, oh my god, I have to act now. What is happening? I have to know Chuck&#8217;s secret? I was like, what is going on here? It&#8217;s a great thing. It&#8217;s a great thing. And I was very excited that I was trusted as an actor with carrying this weight on my shoulders.<br />
<strong><br />
BLAST: We heard earlier a Casey/Ellie romance might be brewing?</strong></p>
<p>RM: Yeah, I don&#8217;t approve of that at all.<br />
<strong><br />
BLAST: What do you think would happen from Awesome? Do you think he&#8217;d let that happen?</strong></p>
<p>RM: I think there would be a lot more fist fights between Awesome and Casey. It would be tough, because I know how strong he is now.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-ryan-mcpartlin-chucks-captain-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Josh Schwartz, co-creator of Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-josh-schwartz-co-creator-of-chuck/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-josh-schwartz-co-creator-of-chuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic-con]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joshua gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Everything people asked for (at the panel) we now will deliver."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>SAN DIEGO &#8212; Josh Schwartz shocked audiences when he was able to switch from angsty teen dramas like &#8220;Gossip Girl&#8221; and &#8220;The OC&#8221; to the action and nerd filled NBC comedy &#8220;Chuck.&#8221; With &#8220;Chuck&#8221; now going into its third season, Schwartz sat down with Blast to talk about the fan response, the possible return of Bryce Larkin and what season three will contain.</p>
<p><strong>On giving the fans what they want:</strong> </p>
<p>Everything people asked for (at the panel) we now will deliver. Jeffster on the web; musical episodes; clearly Casey and Ellie can never even look at each other; Sarah and Chuck can never have any emotional issues, it can only be flowers and daisies and rainbows. Coming here this early in the season for us, we were sort of joking about taking ideas from people, but it was great to see what everybody sort of responds to and what the no-nos are. Things that people don&#8217;t want you to do are sometimes the most fun things to do, because it makes people really go crazy. I&#8217;m not committing one way to anything today, I&#8217;m just saying, expect the unexpected. I don&#8217;t know. I got nothing. [..] This show has benefited greatly from fan reaction and being in sync with the fans and we wouldn&#8217;t be back if it wasn&#8217;t for fans of the show, so we definitely do feel a real responsibility to deliver the show that everybody wants.</p>
<p><strong>On bringing new fans to the show:</strong> </p>
<p>We went into this last year, you know, we had the writer&#8217;s strike and we only got to do 13 episodes and were really building our momentum, and then we had to go off the air for an incredibly long period of time, and we sort of reset the show in a way that hopefully didn&#8217;t feel redundant for viewers of season one but at the same time allowed you to join the show if you hadn&#8217;t, and we will do the same here, but obviously we just pushed the show forward in a big way at the end of the season, and next season will start as a direct pickup from &#8220;I know kung fu.&#8221; So we will pick up from there in a way that hopefully isn&#8217;t confusing to new viewers, and look, for something like this, we&#8217;re just hoping for word of mouth.</p>
<p><strong>On the Jeffster panel performance:</strong> </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve taken on a life of their own. I think spin-offs is what Vik [Sahay] is going to be demanding. </p>
<p><strong>On using Chuck&#8217;s new skills:</strong> </p>
<p>The biggest thing the new powers does for us is to be able to take advantage of Zach Levi&#8217;s gifts as, you know, you obviously saw him do the kung fu, so he clearly can move, he&#8217;s a very physical actor, but he&#8217;s also great into physical comedy. So there&#8217;s opportunities for these things to go awry and push him into like a Steve Martin place, where suddenly he doesn&#8217;t have control over his body in the same way, and that&#8217;s something we&#8217;re really excited for as well.</p>
<p><strong>On the return of Bryce Larkin:</strong> </p>
<p>Well, he was pretty dead, at the end. You really do get to see him expire this time, but I guess you do never know. It&#8217;s all going to depend on how his show does on DNA. His twin brother, Lyce Brarkin. It doesn&#8217;t work as well.</p>
<p><strong>On bridging the show&#8217;s break:</strong> </p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the things we&#8217;ve talked about is, how can we create little episodes or vignettes or seeing somebody privately that at least will allow you to keep these characters alive. And then if we want to seed some storylines too, it&#8217;s like all of the sudden we&#8217;ve been given this great toy to play with, and I think we&#8217;re always looking for ways to kind of build out on the show and keep people, especially if we&#8217;re not going to be on, because who knows: we could be on in November, we could be on in January. So we want to be able to keep people interested; keep people invested in the show.</p>
<p><strong>On keeping Zach and Josh&#8217;s beards:</strong> </p>
<p>We&#8217;re going to try to take advantage of his beard for at least three minutes of the first episode, and then we&#8217;ll do the classic &#8220;lose the beard&#8221; moment. We&#8217;ll see if he has a face left under there because that is a bushy, bushy beard. </p>
<p><strong>On Chuck and Sarah being together:</strong> </p>
<p>I talked about a volatile Chuck/Sarah situation coming into this year and something is going to have happened that between where we pick up in real time and when we jump forward, there&#8217;s an expectation between them that is not fulfilled and that is going create a major issue. And that will keep you watching!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-josh-schwartz-co-creator-of-chuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Yvonne Strahovski, CIA operative extraordinare</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-yvonne-strahovski-cia-operative-extraordinare/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-yvonne-strahovski-cia-operative-extraordinare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic-con]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yvonne strahovski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Sarah pregnant? Well, Morgan did take that condom...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/57979231bmediaventures726200980114PM.jpg" rel="lightbox[21155]" title="57979231bmediaventures726200980114PM"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/57979231bmediaventures726200980114PM-300x202.jpg" alt="57979231bmediaventures726200980114PM" title="57979231bmediaventures726200980114PM" width="300" height="202" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-21158" /></a>SAN DIEGO &#8220;&quot; The epitome of every boy&#8217;s fantasy, Yvonne Strahovski plays Sarah Walker, Zachary Levi&#8217;s Chuck&#8217;s ass-kicking spy handler/love interest on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Chuck.&#8221; Blast was lucky enough to get to sit down with her at San Diego Comic-Con to talk a bit about Chuck and Sarah&#8217;s (finally) consummated chemistry and what could be happening in season three.</p>
<p><strong>On couple&#8217;s spying:</strong> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a Mr. and Mrs. Smith situation, I think.</p>
<p><strong>On when she found out about Chuck learning kung-fu:</strong> </p>
<p>About three days before we actually shot the episode. Yeah, they love to do that. We&#8217;re very informed on what&#8217;s going on. Actually, I know nothing at all about what&#8217;s happening in season three.</p>
<p><strong>On doing stunts:</strong> </p>
<p>I would love to jump from a helicopter, that would be fun. I love doing all that stuff. I get really excited when I have to do a fight scene.</p>
<p><strong>On getting in shape for the show:</strong> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think (Zachary Levi) has been preparing. Mind you, I haven&#8217;t either. I&#8217;ve got from between now and till the sixth of August to start lifting some weights or something, running around the block.</p>
<p><strong>On Chuck and Sarah&#8217;s long-awaited love scene:</strong> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s so great watching it afterwards, seeing it all piece together because you kind of go along for the journey like everyone else is watching it. It&#8217;s hard for us because we shoot out of sequence, so everything is kind of in shambles until we see it. I think it was a great moment. There probably will be more of them I think in the third season. I mean, I hope. It&#8217;s good to kind of go up and down with the love scene.</p>
<p><strong>On the cast: </strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m so separate from that world so much of the time because I&#8217;m in the spy world, you know, it would be nice to interact a bit more with the group as a whole.</p>
<p><strong>On what could split Chuck and Sarah apart in season three:</strong> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, maybe Sarah is pregnant.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-2009-yvonne-strahovski-cia-operative-extraordinare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Zachary Levi, NBC&#8217;s Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-zachary-levi-nbcs-chuck/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-zachary-levi-nbcs-chuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joshua gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yvonne strahovski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even with "Tron Legacy" coming out, the "Tron" poster in Chuck's room will remain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><div id="attachment_21152" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 224px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/57972346bmediaventures726200975249PM.jpg" rel="lightbox[21139]" title="Zachary Levi speaks at TV Guide Magazine Comic-con panel (Media credit/WireImage)"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/57972346bmediaventures726200975249PM-214x300.jpg" alt="Zachary Levi speaks at TV Guide Magazine Comic-con panel (Media credit/WireImage)" title="Zachary Levi speaks at TV Guide Magazine Comic-con panel (Media credit/WireImage)" width="214" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-21152" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zachary Levi speaks at TV Guide Magazine Comic-con panel (Media credit/WireImage)</p></div>SAN DIEGO &#8220;&quot; Beyond the facial hair and the spy stuff, Zachary Levi and offscreen and onscreen buddy Joshua Gomez seem to be the same guys they play on the show. Nerdy, charismatic and with a passion for fun, the guys stole the show during the press room, yelling back and forth to each other and causing laughter with everyone they spoke with. Blast wasn&#8217;t lucky enough to catch Josh Gomez <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2008/09/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/">again</a>, but we were able to chat with Zach Levi, the title &#8220;Chuck&#8221; on NBC&#8217;s spy drama.</p>
<p><strong>On who inspired the beard, Josh Gomez or Zach: </strong></p>
<p>I think that I&#8217;ve actually inspired his [beard]. We&#8217;re both lazy. That&#8217;s really what it comes down to. I have to shave every day for work, so when I&#8217;m not having to work, I&#8217;m not shaving. I boycott shaving. I&#8217;ll trim it. I keep it clean. You&#8217;ve got to respect it. My girlfriend&#8217;s fine with it, so it&#8217;s like rock and roll. Do it. </p>
<p><strong>On getting to join in the action:</strong> </p>
<p>It was really awesome. I&#8217;ve been sitting on the sidelines for the past two years watching Yvonne (Strahovski) and Adam (Baldwin) kick ass and I&#8217;m like, honestly, I&#8217;d really like to be a part of it at some point. I was kind of frustrated. We got to that scene and we didn&#8217;t have very much time to shoot it. I wanted it to be even more kick ass. I felt like it was good, it was cool and it was kind of half way between the comedy and the action, but I kind of wanted it to be straight action. I wanted to be awesome-born, and I was a little noodle-y. I was a little noodle-y and I wasn&#8217;t happy about that. But other than that, it was fun.</p>
<p><strong>On the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; phenomenon:</strong> </p>
<p>I read the pilot back when I was unemployed and I was like, this is an awesome show. This is a show that I&#8217;d watch, this is a show that I&#8217;d love to be a part of, certainly not getting my hopes up too much at that point, and then I got the job and I was like, wow, hopefully the pilot will be good and we&#8217;ll get picked up and we did and then, coming down to Comic-Con the first year when we premiered the pilot, we were in one of the smaller halls, there were still a lot of people there but not anything like this. I think that it is such a blessing to be able to do what I do, but more than that, to be able to be a part of a show that people love like this. That they will come out in mass and fill an entire hall, wear Nerd Herd shirts and Jeffster shirts and all this. Some of them just make it at home, like [gestures like drawing on chest] Sharpie, you know? It&#8217;s amazing. And I just hope that we continue to do the show justice and the fans justice because we&#8217;re not a huge ratings juggernaut, but what we lack in numbers we make up for in just sheer fan passion and fervor and that&#8217;s the kind of thing I want to be a part of.</p>
<p><strong>On whether a <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2009/07/comic-con-2009-tron-legacy/">&#8220;Tron Legacy&#8221;</a> poster will replace the &#8220;Tron&#8221; poster: </strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about that. It&#8217;s kind of classic &#8220;Tron.&#8221; And Bruce was on the show, although he is going to be in the new (&#8220;Tron&#8221;).</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-zachary-levi-nbcs-chuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Chris Fedak, co-creator of Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-chris-fedak-co-creator-of-chuck/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-chris-fedak-co-creator-of-chuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[season three]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony hale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Hale is coming back!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/chuck.jpg" rel="lightbox[21129]" title="chuck"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/chuck-223x300.jpg" alt="chuck" title="chuck" width="223" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-21148" /></a>SAN DIEGO &#8220;&quot; When <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/2009/02/a-sit-down-with-chucks-peeps/">Blast spoke with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; co-creator Chris Fedak last</a>, he and Josh Schwartz were pumping up their game-changing second season finale, which they felt would ensure NBC to give them the greenlight for a third season. Well, their finale was gamechanging, and they got their third season, but Fedak wasn&#8217;t spilling the beans. Even having just come from a packed &#8220;Chuck&#8221; Comic-Con panel where Vik Sahay and Scott Krinsky performed &#8220;Fat-Bottom Girls&#8221; as their onscreen band, Jeffster, wasn&#8217;t enough to give us the details on season three.</p>
<p><strong>On how much of season three is planned: </strong></p>
<p>We know how, like last year, when we sat down to talk about [the season two finale], we knew our ending. I know my ending for the third season as well. So in some ways we go back and we build to that point of where we want to be. And it&#8217;s going to be super big and it&#8217;s going to be super exciting. We use super. I like super stuff. So we kind of know where we&#8217;re going. So right now the writers are half way through the season from a script-writing perspective, and then production will start; we&#8217;ll slow down. </p>
<p><strong>On what season three will be about:</strong> </p>
<p>Chuck now has these abilities. How does he master them? Because it didn&#8217;t come with a manual &#8220;&quot; or maybe it did and we haven&#8217;t seen it yet. And he has Sarah and Casey, not only there to protect him, but also to be the sensai, to help him master these skills. This is like the super hero story told in a little bit of slow motion. ["¦] [Season three]&#8216;s not going to so much veer away [from previous seasons], it&#8217;s going to evolve. For a story about a guy like Chuck, essentially you want to watch him get better at being a spy. You want to watch him master some skills, to be the guy who&#8217;s not just waiting in the car. And I think that that&#8217;s very much where the show is going. So it&#8217;s not much veering, but like an evolution. It should feel like this is where we want to go.</p>
<p><strong>On whether the Buy More will be in season three: </strong></p>
<p>The Buy More will still be an integral part of the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; story. We&#8217;re not losing the Buy More: it&#8217;s our most expensive set. We&#8217;ll definitely be going back there. We&#8217;ve always found that our cast is wonderful, and we want to see Chuck in that world almost as much as we want to see Chuck in the spy world. </p>
<p><strong>On whether Tony Hale will return:</strong> </p>
<p>Tony Hale is going to be a part of season three. And he&#8217;s, umm&#8221;¦ umm&#8221;¦ That&#8217;s all I&#8217;ll say.</p>
<p><strong>On the length of season three:</strong> </p>
<p>Right now we have an order for 13 episodes. NBC can extend that order like they did last season. If they decide to put us on after the Winter Olympics we could go longer. And there&#8217;s always a chance, because schedules aren&#8217;t written in stone, that they could move us up and have us come on earlier. &#8220;¦ We do have a hurry-up office, yes. We start production in a week and a half, so we&#8217;re getting close.              </p>
<p><strong>On guest stars: </strong></p>
<p>Last year when we started thinking about guest stars, thinking about the Michael Clarke Duncan&#8217;s and, you know, there was a lot of like crazy names out there. So this year, we&#8217;ve got this enormous list of just like all the people we love; you know, all our favorite actors, so we&#8217;ll go through it and figure it out. But we haven&#8217;t cast anyone yet but we&#8217;re circling the block. It&#8217;s not &#8220;Love Boat&#8221; but still. I love ideas. If there&#8217;s somebody you think should be on the show, you know &#8230; I think President Obama would be fantastic. However, someone who is an actor and somewhat available to the show, I don&#8217;t know. My &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; nerdiness means I would love Shatner. That would be fantastic. I don&#8217;t know. There&#8217;s so many people I think would be great for our show.</p>
<p><strong>On Chuck kicking ass: </strong></p>
<p>Zach (Levi) has been looking forward to kicking some ass for quite some time. I remember on the pilot explaining to him, &#8220;You know you don&#8217;t get to carry the gun, right?&#8221; and he was quite upset. We had many conversations. So he was super excited to have those abilities. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-chris-fedak-co-creator-of-chuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic-Con 2009: Adam Baldwin from Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-adam-baldwin-from-chuck/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-adam-baldwin-from-chuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=21127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's the one thing Adam Baldwin wants to learn about Casey? Find out inside.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><div id="attachment_21136" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/57982592bmediaventures726200972055PM.jpg" rel="lightbox[21127]" title="Adam Baldwin (left) and Zachary Levi at the Entertainment Weekly and Syfy invade Comic-Con party at Hotel Solamar on July 25"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/57982592bmediaventures726200972055PM-300x206.jpg" alt="Adam Baldwin (left) and Zachary Levi at the Entertainment Weekly and Syfy invade Comic-Con party at Hotel Solamar on July 25" title="Adam Baldwin (left) and Zachary Levi at the Entertainment Weekly and Syfy invade Comic-Con party at Hotel Solamar on July 25" width="300" height="206" class="size-medium wp-image-21136" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Adam Baldwin (left) and Zachary Levi at the Entertainment Weekly and Syfy invade Comic-Con party at Hotel Solamar on July 25</p></div>SAN DIEGO &#8212; Who would have thought that Adam Baldwin, the badass mofo behind &#8220;Chuck&#8217;s&#8221; Casey and &#8220;Firefly&#8217;s&#8221; Jane, would be one of the nicest, most charismatic actors at the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; panel? Granted, between the boys of Lester performing and Zachary Levi and Josh Gomez&#8217;s chemistry, it sounds like it&#8217;s something to top, but Baldwin quickly stole the show at the roundtables.</p>
<p>One of the big questions was whether there would be a romance brewing between NSA Colonel Casey and Chuck&#8217;s newly wed sister, Ellie.</p>
<p>&#8220;The way that sounded in the panel was just sort of a furtive glance. Like I said, I just do what they tell me to do&#8221; Baldwin said. &#8220;I&#8217;ll do what they tell me. If it includes furtive glances, okay.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the second season finale, Chuck uploaded a new Intersect which gave him special kung fu powers &#8220;&quot; and many more that are sure to show themselves in the third season.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s gonna kind of throw a wrench in the works of Beckman&#8217;s plans&#8221; Baldwin said on the U.S. government&#8217;s response to Chuck&#8217;s new skills. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know. Like I said, he&#8217;s an asset even more so now, so we can utilize that. But it will be fun to watch him be sore. Aww, poor Chuck.&#8221;</p>
<p>The season finale was also the first time Casey had been seen with a military team that wasn&#8217;t Chuck and Yvonne Strahovski&#8217;s Sarah.</p>
<p>&#8220;I would love to have the team back, the SWAT team &#8220;&quot; new ones, yeah&#8221; Baldwin said. &#8220;Casey&#8217;s looking for a way out, I think, but now that Chuck has extra skills, he might be even more of an asset, so he can use that, although there will be a rebooting period of lactic acid build up and sloughing.&#8221;</p>
<p>When asked if Casey will have a code word to shut off Chuck&#8217;s skills, Baldwin perked up and replied, &#8220;That&#8217;s a great idea&#8221; and then yelling across the press room, &#8220;Fedak, write that down!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Will you submit that in an e-mail?&#8221; he asked.</p>
<p>The one thing he would like to see as far as Casey goes is to meet Casey&#8217;s mom, Baldwin said.</p>
<p>&#8220;I want to know who she is. Now, it&#8217;s either a Mindy Sterling type, and I keep pushing that name because I love Mindy Sterling &#8220;&quot; love her &#8220;&quot; either that or the woman who played the Trunchbull in &#8220;Matilda&#8221; would be a great Casey mom&#8221; he said.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/comic-con-09-adam-baldwin-from-chuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Davitian to be in &#8220;Chuck&#8221; episode</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/ken-davitian-to-be-in-chuck-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/ken-davitian-to-be-in-chuck-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken davitian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you may not kiss the bride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=11848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know his ass from the movies, but now you will know his face from television. Ken Davitian, recent star in "Get Smart" and "Borat," will be featured on an episode of the NBC comedy "Chuck."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>You know his ass from the movies, but now you will know his face from television. Ken Davitian, recent star in &#8220;Get Smart&#8221; and &#8220;Borat,&#8221; will be featured on an episode of the NBC comedy &#8220;Chuck.&#8221;</p>
<p>Davitian will play the character &#8220;Uncle Bernie,&#8221; designed by creators Chris Fedak and Josh Schwartz to be a shout out to &#8220;Uncle Bernie&#8217;s Vacation.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They wrote the character with me in mind,&#8221; Davitian said.</p>
<p>The episode Davitian is in, set to air this Monday, follows the current &#8220;Chuck&#8221; plot line where title character Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi) is searching for his missing father.</p>
<p>Davitian is a member of Fulcrum, a rogue spy agency Chuck and his NSA and CIA handlers have been fighting against. Davitian&#8217;s Uncle Bernie goes to a &#8220;very close friend&#8217;s daughter&#8217;s wedding;&#8221; the daughter being someone he has previously recruited to Fulcrum.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, due to my large derriere, I have a heart attack,&#8221; Davitian said about Uncle Bernie. &#8220;My character is dead to my knowledge, but who knows what they&#8217;ll do with it after.&#8221;</p>
<p>Though the characters did not find out anything from Bernie due to his untimely demise, Davitian said they did end up finding where to go next in the search for Mr. Bartowski.</p>
<p>Davitian also let it slip Chuck&#8217;s ex-girlfriend Jill will make an appearance in the episode. Chuck is also interested in his CIA handler, Sarah Walker (Yvonne Strahovski).</p>
<p>&#8220;They never give me those sexual tension roles,&#8221; Davitian said. He also noted for all casting directors out there his top two picks are Anne Hathaway (his co-star from &#8220;Get Smart&#8221;) and Scarlett Johannsen.</p>
<p>&#8220;They keep saying that 50 is the new 40, and I believe if I wait long enough, 300 lbs will be the next 150,&#8221; Davitian joked.</p>
<p>Making a TV episode is much like making a mini-movie, Davitian said, citing the 18-hour-a-day, eight-day effort it takes to film just one episode. He said there wasn&#8217;t much nerdiness or joking around while on the set.</p>
<p>&#8220;[The "Chuck" set] was a well oiled machine,&#8221; Davitian said. &#8220;The writing makes you stay funny while you&#8217;re acting serious.&#8221;</p>
<p>He was especially impressed by Levi, who he met before, Davitian said. When asked if Levi was as big a nerd in real life as he is portrayed on the show, Davitian said, &#8220;When I was young, we called them nerds. Now they&#8217;re considered intellectual and intelligent because I&#8217;ve got to tell you, I don&#8217;t know how to work that box they call a computer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Davitian is starring in an upcoming romantic comedy called &#8220;You May Not Kiss The Bride&#8221; alongside Katherine McPhee, Mena Suvari, Vinnie Jones and Dave Annable. He plays McPhee&#8217;s father who is trying to get his daughter married so she can get her citizenship.</p>
<p>He had shot a sitcom with Bernie Mac previous to the late actor&#8217;s passing. He also is set to star in a film where he plays Luciano Pavarotti.</p>
<p>&#8220;I really like making movies, but I also like television,&#8221; Davitian said. &#8220;You just want to be somewhere in front of a camera.&#8221;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/ken-davitian-to-be-in-chuck-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A sit down with Chuck&#8217;s peeps</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/a-sit-down-with-chucks-peeps/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/a-sit-down-with-chucks-peeps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Comic-Con 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Page One Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic-con]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yvonna strahovski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=10208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK &#8212; Blast had an opportunity to chat with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; creators Josh Schwartz and Chris Fedak and star Yvonne Strahovski at New York Comic Con earlier this month. Schwartz and Fedak announced some upcoming guest stars to the show, namely Chevy Chase and Scott Bakula, both of whom will remain through the season finale. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>NEW YORK &#8212; Blast had an opportunity to chat with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; creators Josh Schwartz and Chris Fedak and star Yvonne Strahovski at New York Comic Con earlier this month.</p>
<p>Schwartz and Fedak announced some upcoming guest stars to the show, namely Chevy Chase and Scott Bakula, both of whom will remain through the season finale. They also mentioned a potential return of the Awesomes and that Jeff&#8217;s sister will be introduced to the show.‚ </p>
<p>Schwartz said there was always a possibility for more &#8220;The OC&#8221; alums to be included in the show in addition to last season&#8217;s Rachel Bilson and Melinda Clarke.‚ </p>
<p>They also discussed the season finale, which Schwartz said was currently being written would a &#8220;game changer&#8221; and send the show in an entirely new direction. He emphasized the finale would not be a series finale.‚ </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s pretty mind-blowing,&#8221; Schwartz said about the finale. &#8220;It&#8217;s going to be a lot of fun. It&#8217;s something we&#8217;ve been talking about for two years now and it&#8217;s going to launch the show in a really exciting, pretty different direction actually.‚ </p>
<p>Strahovski talked a bit about her makeover for &#8220;Chuck Versus the Cougars&#8221; where she plays a nerdy teenager &#8212; bad hair cut, braces and all. She described that look as &#8220;the real me&#8221; and said it gave her flashbacks to when she was 12 and had braces of her own.‚ </p>
<p>Superbowl special &#8220;Chuck Versus The Third Dimension&#8221; was also discussed &#8212; the episodes aired the Monday after the Superbowl and was the first television episode to be shot entirely in 3D.‚ </p>
<p>Schwartz and Fedak did not know if the 3D version of the episode would make it to the second season DVD (with a pair of 3D glasses packaged with it).‚ </p>
<p>Schwartz also didn&#8217;t know if they would create another 3D episode or instead outdo themselves &#8212; maybe next time in Smell-O-Vision.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/a-sit-down-with-chucks-peeps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An interview with Pushing Daisies creator Bryan Fuller</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-pushing-daisies-creator-bryan-fuller/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-pushing-daisies-creator-bryan-fuller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blast Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry sonnenfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bryan fuller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead like me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emmys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristin chenoweth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcdonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pushing daisies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=2768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blast got to have an in depth talk with "Pushing Daisies" creator Bryan Fuller. We talked about what we can expect from its second season, the 12 Emmy nominations it got for its nine aired episodes, and just how much we both love McDonald's deep-fried pies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Blast got to have an in depth talk with &#8220;Pushing Daisies&#8221; creator Bryan Fuller. We talked about what we can expect from its second season, the 12 Emmy nominations it got for its nine aired episodes, and just how much we both love McDonald&#8217;s deep-fried pies:</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: How goes the filming of &#8220;Pushing Daisies&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>BF: It&#8217;s going really well; we&#8217;re filming episode seven right now. We start episode eight Friday [August 29], and we&#8217;re moving along. We just turned in our outline for episode 10 and are story doc-ing it for episode 11 and about to turn in our story for 12 and we have 13 episodes ordered and so we have one more to go in the order before they have to tell us if we&#8217;re doing more or not. So it&#8217;s very exciting.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: You guys got cut really short last year. How did that change the story progression?</strong></p>
<p>BF: You know, there&#8217;s a lot of stuff that we&#8217;re doing this year that we were going to do in the first season, but I think what really helped us is the fact that this is the second season and there were some stories the network was really nervous about like &#8220;I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s a first season story or if you should save that for second season.&#8221; It really actually helped us to come back with the second season so we could do some of the stories they were nervous about letting us do in the first season, since we had such a short first season, we got to do right away in the second season. It also really helped us kind of get perspective on the show. When the shut down happened, when it was like &#8220;Pencils down&#8221; from the Writer&#8217;s Guild, we were almost at the end of our scripts anyways, so we were scrambling to get another script ready, and then the shut down happened, so we didn&#8217;t have to worry about that. So a lot of those ideas we kind of got back-burnered but the specific episodes; we redid like one or two of them and there are still quite a few that we want to do from last year that were going to be part of the first season. The good thing is that we were just able to get perspective. So we took a step back from the show and being on break and working the terrors of production gave us a chance to just stop and say &#8220;Okay, what&#8217;s the story that we want to tell?&#8221;, &#8220;Where are these characters going?&#8221; It just gave us the necessary breathing room to chart out a second season which I am really proud of and very excited by. I think the writer&#8217;s strike allowed us to not get trapped in the sophomore slump of shows and you feel kind of a lag in the creativity because you see it literally go right from one to the other, and in this case it really allowed us to recharge our batteries, consider what was working on the show and maybe what was not working as well and just have a much more invigorated approach to the second season.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Can you give us a preview of what we might be seeing in the second season?</strong></p>
<p>BF: Well all the cliff-hangers that we had; we had the cliff-hanger with Swoosie Kurtz&#8217;s character Lily, that plays a big factor in the first three episodes. Really, beyond that, it really is just a big game changer that affects all of the characters; we understand why that secret was kept and why Lily made the choices that she did to not be honest with Chuck about their relationship and we see what happens when Olive, who has been keeping all these secrets from everybody, how her breakdown sends her off to a nunnery to keep those secrets and what happens when she comes back and lets Chuck know and where does that take Chuck, what&#8217;s Chuck&#8217;s reaction. She&#8217;s in a difficult situation because she can&#8217;t just go to Lily. Here are these two people like mother and daughter who both think the other one is dead, and it puts them in a really odd situation that we&#8217;re going to have a lot of fun with that drama of that particular situation. We also are introducing a character in episode five named Dwight Dixon played by Stephen Root, and he will have a shared history with Chuck&#8217;s father and Ned&#8217;s father and will stir up a lot of hullaballoo for Ned and he becomes a catalyst to really bring the aunts into the story of the Pie Hole in a way that we really hadn&#8217;t seen last year because it was one of those things we were forced to do because of Chuck&#8217;s situation and people not knowing she was alive again was to keep the aunts separate. In our first episode, we have the aunts marching through the front door of the Pie Hole and what happens to our characters when that world starts to encroach on theirs and how do they react. It really is about trying to put the characters in really fun situations where they&#8217;re forced to keep the secrets that they&#8217;ve been trying to keep keeping but may not be able to for long because the walls between worlds are crumbling down.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: So is it safe to safe to say that Chuck&#8217;s secret becomes more tenuous? That it might be harder to keep, which we were kind of seeing at the end of last season?</strong></p>
<p>BF: Yes, definitely. We&#8217;re definitely steering towards as much drama as we can mine from that idea as possible. Last year we had an episode &#8220;The Fun in Funeral&#8221; where Chuck discovers that a watch that was buried with her was stolen by the funeral director, and she gets it back. That watch basically plays a pivotal role around the middle of the season, and we understand that there is significant weight on that watch and that people want it for various reasons.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Last season, surprisingly for it being cut short, felt very un-rushed; the progression still felt really natural. Where will the second season pick up?</strong></p>
<p>The second season picks up ten months after the first season. They&#8217;re kind of in the same place where Chuck and Ned ‚ we saw last season were in an emotionally difficult place and those wounds have healed and they&#8217;re moving forward, but who hasn&#8217;t ‚ healed is Olive who&#8217;s been forced to be the keeper of a great many secrets. We pick up in a way that that picks up kind of where we left of, except a lot of time has passed which kind of allows Olive to buckle under the weight of all the secrets she has been keeping, that spurs a very dramatic decisions on her part to quit the Pie Hole and leave and set out on a life of her own where she doesn&#8217;t have to be keeping his secrets from so many people.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: So does she end up actually leaving, or is that part of the drama that unfolds?</strong></p>
<p>BF: That&#8217;s part of the drama that unfolds; she quits the Pie Hole the first episode and joins a nunnery.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What was the decision behind throwing [Kristin Chenoweth] on the show? I hear she&#8217;s going to have more musical numbers too.</strong></p>
<p>BF: She is. Barry Sonnenfeld, who directed the pilot, is one of our executive producers that just worked with her on a movie called &#8220;RV&#8221; with Robin Williams, and we talking about who Olive was and how she has a relatively small role in the pilot and that role would get bigger as the series develops. And because of how much story telling we had to get done in the pilot because being a primus story there wasn&#8217;t a lot of room to do a ton with Olive. As we got into the season, we really fleshed out her role, and basically had this conversation; Barry and I got on the phone with Kristin and made her promise that if you do this show we will not let your talents go to waste. That&#8217;s why we created the musical numbers for her and one of the things about doing an ensemble show is that there&#8217;s an ebb and flow with the characters so we will have some characters be featured more in some episodes and others less so and so we have a great arch for all of the team this season and then she is&#8230; not relegated to the background, but she becomes so much a part of the crime solving team that we&#8217;re able to see much more of her this season than we were last season. Kristin is Carol Burnett. She has such fantastic comedic timing. She&#8217;s also a wonderful dramatic actress. She really is the Carol Burnett for our generation.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: At Comic-con, you were saying that the idea for &#8220;Pushing Daisies&#8221; came from a future idea you had for &#8220;Dead Like Me.&#8221; Is there ever going to be a similar foil that can kill people like your character in &#8220;Dead Like Me&#8221; who is introduced in &#8220;Pushing Daisies&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>BF: There&#8217;s no plan for that right now. There are going to be some small crossovers between &#8220;Dead Like Me&#8221; and &#8220;Wonderfalls&#8221; and &#8220;Pushing Daisies&#8221; planned throughout the season, but just letting an audience know that those three series exist in the same universe. Right now we have so many stories to tell with Ned and Chuck and Emerson and the aunts that right now I can&#8217;t imagine being able to squeeze in that. But maybe that&#8217;s a fun thing to do in the third season, knocking on wood that we get one.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: You guys have been nominated for 12 Emmys. Give me your response to that great critical feedback.</strong></p>
<p>BF: It&#8217;s a pretty fantastic ratio for having only done nine episodes to get 12 Emmy nominations. It&#8217;s always the &#8220;I&#8217;m so happy for everyone who got nominated&#8221; and I&#8217;m thrilled that I got nominated for writing the pilot and I also wanted Ellen and Swoosie and Chi and Anna to be nominated but I was thrilled that Kristin and Lee were nominated and Barry was nominated and that a production designer. It&#8217;s a wonderful acknowledgement that everybody&#8217;s back-breaking work from last season, and everybody was functioning on all cylinders and so committed to this show and the creative vision that it just makes me proud.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: It&#8217;s definitely something to be proud of.</strong></p>
<p>BF: Well thank you.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Can you tell me a little bit more of where the creative vision came from? It definitely has a very unique feel to it.</strong></p>
<p>BF: It&#8217;s very much like decorating a Christmas tree. The idea started back on &#8220;Dead Like Me&#8221; when I thought &#8220;Okay, Georgia is a character who touches people and takes their souls and wouldn&#8217;t it be interesting if she had a romantic foil for somebody who touches people and gives their life back.&#8221; Then I put that idea in my back pocket and it just kept on percolating. I had a deal with Warner Bros. to do a pilot for them. I pitched several ideas for TV series and by that time I was like &#8220;You know, I&#8217;m just going to write ["Pushing Daisies"] as a feature. I tried for several years to get it done and they seemed very interested in doing it as a TV series. So I thought, &#8220;Okay, I&#8217;ll just do it as a feature.&#8221; As a last minute thing I pitched it in that pitch session and Susan at Warner Bros. Television was like &#8220;That&#8217;s the one. That&#8217;s the idea that we&#8217;re doing.&#8221; What I pitched was that a guy can touch dead people and bring them back to life, but if he touches them twice they go back to being dead and he falls in love with a dead girl and he can never touch her again. That was kind of the pitch of the show. So the pie-maker came after that. I was like &#8220;What&#8217;s that one-liner that&#8217;s kind of odd.&#8221; I just kept on thinking &#8220;Well what does this guy do? Well, I like pie, so maybe he&#8217;s a pie-maker. I love reading, I like to read just voraciously, so she&#8217;s a shut in who reads every book that ever comes across her path,&#8221; and literally just started putting one ornament on the tree after another, and then some ornaments would come off and others would go on and I would add tinsel and light and finally the star on top. It&#8217;s strange how these ideas are developed because they are living breathing things in and of their own light and a lot of times the show will tell you what it wants to be. It really is a fascinating process because as much as I would like to say &#8220;This was the plan, and I carried it out with precision&#8221; it&#8217;s just so random and you have to see what fits and what looks good and if it&#8217;s something that&#8217;s too much then you take it off and the whole process of creating a TV show is really an interesting arch.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: It&#8217;s very much developed.</strong></p>
<p>BF: Developed is such a great word because it&#8217;s something that, like you&#8217;re preparing a dish, so you add ingredients and you take ingredients away and you bake it for a certain amount of time and then you have to pull it out of the oven and butter the crust and there&#8217;s so many steps that can either ruin the dish or make it better than you imagined all along the way that it&#8217;s alchemy.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What about the look for the show?</strong></p>
<p>BF: There&#8217;s big inspiration in &#8220;Amelie&#8221; for all sorts of reasons; tradition reasons and the story telling and also the look, the saturated colors and the hyper-reality and then there&#8217;s also the working with Barry Sonnenfeld who is such a fantastic visualist. What I love about Barry and his approach to making anything is that he wants it to be pretty. He&#8217;s like &#8220;Okay, this has to be pretty. This could be prettier.&#8221; He&#8217;s got an aesthetic where he appreciates beauty and sometimes we see movies and television and they revel in kind of like ugly images and Barry is not that guy. He appreciates beauty and wants to create it. It couldn&#8217;t have been a better pairing.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Some of the content on the show; you guys touch on bulimia and the doll and [a character] thinks she&#8217;s a human, but you guys take it with such a grain of salt and such comedy, was that ever an issue trying to get some of the problems that they had to use detective work on into the show?</strong></p>
<p>BF: Not a big problem. There were some stories that we weren&#8217;t able to do because sometimes we tipped the scales a bit on certain issues. Usually for the bulimia and the episode dummy it was just a small flavor of who this character was and there wasn&#8217;t too much&#8230; The network tends to get nervous when we go big and gross, so we try not to go to big and gross places. But if it&#8217;s a matter of, once again, alchemy&#8217;s a great word; it&#8217;s a matter of finding that delicate balance of things in the right ratios that make them much more digestible than if we had significantly spent time in the bathroom stall with that character and her vomiting than it might now be as&#8230; fun. So like suggestions of things I find go much further than the visceral brutality of other things.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: How did you develop that sort kind of relationship, especially between Ned and Chuck where they&#8217;re these adults but they still have this childness to them?</strong></p>
<p>BF: I think that&#8217;s really my outlook on life, that there is a sense and an appreciation to life. I think that&#8217;s what is so great about Ned and Chuck and their relationship, is that they have awe for each other and I think that the world could do with more awe. ‚ Being able to step back and say &#8220;Wow that&#8217;s neat,&#8221; and for me consciousness is enough to make me go &#8220;Gah&#8221; about being alive, because this base between the backs of your eyes and the back of your head is thick that it can&#8217;t be measured and for me that&#8217;s enough for me to believe in a power that&#8217;s much greater then I will ever be, and appreciate my role in the universe, however small it is. It&#8217;s pretty awe-inspiring.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Never has a show made me more hungry than this show, I swear. With all the pie, I&#8217;ve been craving a nice apple pie for like the past month or so. Can you talk a little bit more about the whole choice for the pie?</strong></p>
<p>BF: You know, really for me it was just sitting down to do this show, I just wanted to fill it with so many things I love. I couldn&#8217;t do Criminal Minds or CSI, because you have to live in a very dark head space and a very dark outlook on the human condition. Working on a TV show really is in a lot of ways a prison sentence; you live it, you breathe it, you sacrifice your personal life because it just demands so much of you. I wanted to fill it with so many things I love, that when I have to be here all hours of the night that I was here with things that make me happy. And I love pie. I love a good cherry pie.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Every episode just doesn&#8217;t leave you alone, it&#8217;s like &#8220;Oh my god I want pie so much right now!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>BF: I miss those old McDonald deep fried pies.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Oh my god, yes!</strong></p>
<p>BF: Remember those?</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Oh absolutely. I think they still do the apple pies there don&#8217;t they?</strong></p>
<p>BF: Well they used to have them in these little hot pockets, and slide them. I think they had a lot of law suits, because people would bite into them and take off all the skin from the inside of their mouths. But I miss those. That was one of my happiest moments; going through the McDonald&#8217;s drive-thru and getting a cherry pie.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: They had cherry pie and I think they had peach at one point, and I would get the apple and they had them two for a dollar and I would just be like &#8220;Ah, this is heaven.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>BF: [laughter] The cherry was always my favorite. And you know, a great apple pie is so hard to come by.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Yes, yes. Diners are the classic place to go and get pie, and they look so great on shows like &#8220;Gilmore Girls,&#8221; and then I go to a diner and they aren&#8217;t quite up to snuff.</strong></p>
<p>BF: No, no. I mean like, &#8220;Twin Peaks,&#8221; their pies, yum yum yum.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: We&#8217;ll be on the search for the perfect pie. But back to the show!</strong></p>
<p>BF: That&#8217;s a good aspiration.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Are we ever going to see Alfredo again? He had this brief two episode stint where Kristin Chenoweth realized she had this potential for another relationship and then he didn&#8217;t come back.</strong></p>
<p>BF: Well, we were going to have him come back this season, but he booked a play. As soon as he&#8217;s available and we can squeeze him in, we absolutely want to get him back. We have a new romance that&#8217;s going to be a brewing for Kristin this season, and what we want to do is get knee deep into that hot and heavy, and then bring Alfredo back. So that there is a big conflict on whom does she choose?</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Well at least she&#8217;s finding some happiness instead of being upset the whole time about Ned and Chuck.</strong></p>
<p>BF: Yeah, we got to give her some happy.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Okay, and for my final questions, is there any hope for Ned and Chuck?</strong></p>
<p>BF: In terms of&#8230;?</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Their relationship continuing versus just being on the brink every second hoping that there is no accidental touch that&#8217;s going to send Chuck back?</strong></p>
<p>BF: I think there is a tremendous amount of hope for Ned and Chuck. We&#8217;re going to see all sorts of devices. I&#8217;m excited about an episode were doing now, episode eight, where something really big happens in the story and it&#8217;s something where you just want to see Ned and Chuck hold each other and you cut to, Ned and Chuck spooning, where Ned has his arms around her holding her tight and then you reveal that there&#8217;s a plastic divider that&#8217;s he&#8217;s pulling a plastic bubble holding her. So we&#8217;re coming up with all sorts of ways we can get them to touch without touching. What&#8217;s really fun about this season is that we&#8217;ve sexualized Chuck and Ned&#8217;s relationship. It&#8217;s a family show so we don&#8217;t go too far, but we definitely treating them as two sexual adults. There is some nudity, but it&#8217;s eight o&#8217;clock, so not that kind of nudity, but there&#8217;s bare backs and stuff like that. It&#8217;s nice to see them grow in that direction.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: They aren&#8217;t going to be kissing each other through Emerson or anything like that though, right?</strong></p>
<p>BF: Like Ned kisses Emerson and Emerson kisses Chuck? [laughter] No, we won&#8221;Ëœt be doing that. We do have by proxy high fives and stuff like that that Emerson helps out in. No, he will be out of their bedroom business. He wants to stay away from that.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-pushing-daisies-creator-bryan-fuller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An interview with Chuck creator Chris Fedak</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-chuck-creator-chris-fedak/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-chuck-creator-chris-fedak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blast Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emmett milbarge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[season two]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony hale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blast talked with "Chuck" co-creator Chris Fedak about what season two has in store, who will be coming to the show, and just how long it will take for the big secrets in the Chuck-iverse to be revealed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Blast talked with &#8220;Chuck&#8221; co-creator Chris Fedak about what season two has in store, who will be coming to the show, and just how long it will take for the big secrets in the Chuck-iverse to be revealed:</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: How is shooting for &#8220;Chuck&#8221; going?</strong></p>
<p>CF: It&#8217;s going well; we&#8217;re shooting episode 2.09. So we&#8217;re nine episodes in and we&#8217;re currently writing episode 13. It&#8217;s going really, really well.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: This is the first [show] you&#8217;ve done, right? Can you maybe tell me a little bit about that?</strong></p>
<p>CF: Yeah, before this I was working at the film archive for the Motion Picture Film Academy. Then I was also writing features on the side, and I had a feature in development, but by hook or by crook I couldn&#8217;t show it to anyone as a spec, but I could show it to TV people, because TV feature people don&#8217;t talk. So Josh read it and really dug it, and we went to school together so we started talking about TV shows we liked to see. That&#8217;s where &#8220;Chuck&#8221; came from.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: The first time I saw the whole Buy More parody off of Best Buy, I couldn&#8217;t get over that. I thought it was so funny. ["Chuck"] definitely has those elements, like when Chuck and Bryce are talking in Klingon. It definitely has that funny, more-comedy-than-comedy element to it.</strong></p>
<p>CF: Yeah, that&#8217;s the fun of the show for us. There are those moments where the show has high concept action; in each episode we try to come up with something we haven&#8217;t seen before, or if we have seen it before, we put some sort of twist or turn on it. And then on the other side of the coin there is the Buy More story. It&#8217;s like Chuck&#8217;s story with his sister Ellie and Captain Awesome. Those stories are just as important; the heart-warming stuff at home or the high comedy at the Buy More. It&#8217;s really fun to make the show because there are so many things that just put a smile on the face as we&#8217;re doing it.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: So what part of the show is you and what part of the show is Josh, because Josh&#8217;s other projects; &#8220;The OC&#8221; and &#8220;Gossip Girl&#8221;, have a very, very different feel than &#8220;Chuck&#8221; does.</strong></p>
<p>CF: It&#8217;s our work together. We co-wrote the pilot, and I think it&#8217;s very much a matching of our sensibilities. Before working on &#8220;Chuck,&#8221; I was writing what most people would consider action stuff, and Josh&#8217;s stuff shows he can write action, but he&#8217;s also been very successful with the comedy and soap opera stuff with &#8220;The OC&#8221; and &#8220;Gossip Girl.&#8221; I think that the show &#8220;Chuck&#8221; is definitely comes from the imaginings of two guys who grew up in the 80s and watched a whole lot of Spielberg movies, a lot of Joe Dante movies [...]. Sometimes when we thing about the show and the stuff that we want to include, we&#8217;ll say it&#8217;s on the cutting edge of 1984. It&#8217;s very much the product of that 80s psych, and Josh and I both think in the same TV and movies. Sometimes there&#8217;s just the ideal cop in the room, and we all know what we&#8217;re tapping into. We&#8217;re tapping into some music video that we all watched way too many times or a TV show that we were obsessed with when we were 13. Sometimes there&#8217;s an episode which is like one person&#8217;s obsession more than everybody else. We&#8217;ve got a really exciting episode coming up which is based on old Atari video games. That was very much the writer who is working on this sort of disgrace, and we all kind of dug it because it&#8217;s like &#8220;Oh, that&#8217;s half the stuff we were obsessed with as kids.&#8221; When it comes to the physical production of &#8220;Chuck,&#8221; Josh is a fantastic show runner. With all his experience from &#8220;The OC&#8221;, he knows how to run a television show, so it&#8217;s a real learning process for myself just to go from writing scripts to actually in television, it&#8217;s such an involved process. The writers are involved not only in the writing of it, but also in the casting, the producing, and then the editing of the show; you&#8217;re there all along the way. So then as a producer, I&#8217;ve learned an incredible amount in just the last two years. It&#8217;s like the best master class anyone could have. I suggest that everyone get their own television show. Josh has been a great partner in that.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: You guys kind of got cut off partway through your first season because of the strike. How many episodes are you going for this season?</strong></p>
<p>CF: The expectation of probably 20 could kind of change more or less partway through the season. We&#8217;re currently working on our first 13 episodes, with the expectation that we&#8217;ll get a back nine from NBC, which is the way it usually works in television; if you make 13 episodes, then they&#8217;ll order nine more. We&#8217;ve designed the season very much around the lines of taking the 22 episodes, and then if NBC decides maybe even more, who knows. In our first season, we made 13 episodes, and we had just kind of gotten to the realization that people were really digging the show and we had found a really nice audience and we were building. It was around episode six of our first season that we really got into the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; back story and we realized that people were truly interested in the mythology of the show. They wanted to know about more about Chuck, where he comes from, why Bryce sent him the Intersect&#8217;s secrets. We were just really digging into that mystery when, unfortunately, the writers&#8217; strike hit. Then we had to kind of close up shop. After the strike was over, NBC decided to give us a second season as opposed to nine more episodes. What we essentially did was take most of the concepts we wanted to get into in the back nine and turn that into the beginning of the second season. Of course you have to massage everything when you do that because essentially a season is kind of like a giant book with each episode being a chapter. We&#8217;ve gone back and our first episode we&#8217;re definitely re-launching the show, so that if a person didn&#8217;t watch those first 13 episodes, they can kind of get back into the show very quickly, or understand the show very quickly. We had a lot of great ideas that we were very excited about, and now we&#8217;re looking forward to getting into them. I think that when Josh and I first came up with the show, we were very much thinking about stand alone episodes, kind of like a show from the 60s, 70s, or 80s. It would be a mystery of the week or an action show of the week. And you would have a villain come in and tell a little mini action-comedy story, but we realized that people really liked the mythology, and I think that people have been primed with shows like &#8220;Lost&#8221; and &#8220;The X-Files&#8221;, expect mythology. It was exciting for us; it was like &#8220;Oh, people want to know more. They want to have recurring villains and they want to have a greater sense of the mythology and a greater sense of the mystery.&#8221; We loved to oblige them in the second season.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Is this going to have a more direct plot? Is there going to be an actual nemesis, more so than Bryce, that&#8217;s going to be introduced?</strong></p>
<p>CF: Yeah, absolutely. We began to tease out the idea that there was an organization called Fulcrum in the first season, which is essentially like in &#8220;Three Days of the Condor&#8221; in the way he describes a CIA within the CIA. This mysterious organization is something we&#8217;re playing with now in the second season. Like, who exactly are these people and what do they want? A lot of shows have gone down this road and we are looking to tell it, but what&#8217;s our original &#8220;Chuck&#8221; take on that? I mean, they have operatives and people who are looking for Bryce Larkin because they believe that Bryce is the Intersect computer. But it&#8217;s like &#8220;What makes these people tick?&#8221; In our show, it&#8217;s like there&#8217;s always intermediates, there&#8217;s a lot of villains who are working for [Fulcrum], or working for people who don&#8217;t even know. Through this season, we&#8217;d like to get the audience excited about what is actually happening and what in our bigger, overarching mystery. What is their plan? There will be more of an organization as well as Bryce Larkin will [be involved]. Fulcrum is something we look forward to getting into.</p>

<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-chuck-creator-chris-fedak/attachment/nup_108633_1144-2/' title='NUP_108633_1144'><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nup_108633_11441.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="NUP_108633_1144" title="NUP_108633_1144" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-chuck-creator-chris-fedak/attachment/nup_131113_03261/' title='nup_131113_03261'><img width="100" height="100" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nup_131113_03261-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="nup_131113_03261" title="nup_131113_03261" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-chuck-creator-chris-fedak/attachment/nup_108633_0955-2/' title='NUP_108633_0955'><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nup_108633_09551.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="NUP_108633_0955" title="NUP_108633_0955" /></a>

<p><strong>BLAST: I&#8217;m taking from that that you might get into them very quickly in the first few episodes?</strong></p>
<p>CF: Yes, you could say that. You could definitely say that. The show is started with a real bang this year. Our first episode is an epic. We&#8217;ve got amazing bits of action having to do with the re-launch of the new Intersect computer, Chuck thinking that he might be let go, that the government might be done with him, and he can go back to his old life. What does that mean for him and Sarah? I would say that our first three episodes are definitely an arch unto themselves; essentially getting us back into the show and dealing with the Sarah/ Chuck romance. They&#8217;re really romantic. There&#8217;s a lot of romance in the first three episodes, as well as a lot of slam-bang action.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What about Bryce? I heard he&#8217;s going to be coming back a couple of times this season.</strong></p>
<p>CF: Yeah, Matt Bomer is fantastic; we worked with him last season. He was also the first person to work on the pilot on our first day of shooting with the Intersect vault scene. Matt brought such a great energy to the show that it&#8217;s been a real great pleasure to work with him. He will be coming back to the show this year right now. And he comes back at a very unfortunate time for poor Charles Irving Bartowski.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: I feel like there are a lot of questions left in the &#8220;Chuck&#8221; mythology, even back to the Stanford days, because we didn&#8217;t get a quite clear explanation from Bryce&#8217;s perspective why he did what he did. How long is it going to take for those to get cleared up?</strong></p>
<p>CF: Some of the mysteries are things that even Bryce doesn&#8217;t know the answers to. Those things will be addressed this season. But when you see Bryce, he won&#8217;t have all the answers for you. In other parts of the show, we will go back to Stanford, but maybe they won&#8217;t deal with Bryce. We&#8217;ll definitely be going back into each of our characters&#8217; back stories and teasing out those things that lead to who they are personally but also to the mythology of the show; the Intersect super computer, Bryce Larkin, Fulcrum, and why Chuck was sent those secrets. I think that that&#8217;s definitely what will be answered by the end of the season.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Can you tell me a little bit about Tony Hale joining the cast?</strong></p>
<p>CF: Ah, Tony Hale; he&#8217;s great. And that goes to the Buy More side of the story. A lot of the time we talk about spy stuff on the show, but such great fun is in the works for the comedy side of things, inside the Buy More. Tony Hale will be joining the cast as Emmett Milbarge, the new assistant manager inside the Buy More. Emmett is a passive aggressive character, and sometimes overtly aggressive. And when he comes into the store, it&#8217;s like he lasers in on one Charles Irving Bartowski because he realizes these are two men cut from the same cloth; leaders, college men as well. Unfortunately Chuck is public enemy number one for Emmett Milbarge. We kind of saw Emmett as someone cut from the J. Edgar Hoover cloth by way of Mussolini. His presence in the store is a new challenge for Chuck. One of the things we love about the show is that the stakes inside the Buy More are sometimes as seemingly high as the stakes out there in the real world, with the intensity. When people go to their jobs, it&#8217;s the most important thing in their life. For Morgan and Jeff and Lester and Anna, Emmett Milbarge is their Fulcrum, is their evil nemesis. Tony is fantastic; he&#8217;s come in and he&#8217;s hilarious, and we&#8217;ve been really enjoying cutting his episodes.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Are there any surprises you can let us know about in the first episode? Anything we can look forward to?</strong></p>
<p>CF: Essentially by the end of the teaser; first episode, our entire show is turned on its head. It&#8217;s an exciting, amazing episode with a twist ending that hopefully no one in their right mind will see coming, except for the people that wrote it. Also, just in the upcoming episodes, we&#8217;ve got a lot of great cast members coming on. Tony Hale. We also have Melinda Clarke from &#8220;The OC&#8221; coming as Sasha Banacheck, KGB spy. We have John Larroquette on the show playing episode two, playing Roe Montgomery, the master seducer who will train Chuck Bartowski in how to seduce women. We also have Michael Clarke Duncan in the first episode; 2.01, starring as the villain of that one. In episode 2.04 we have Nicole Richie who is really funny. So we have a lot of really great guest stars coming on this year and it&#8217;s been a lot of fun to cut these people in and introduce them to our crazy world. The show really comes to life.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/interviews/an-interview-with-chuck-creator-chris-fedak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An interview with Chuck&#8217;s Joshua Gomez</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terri Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blast Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Page One Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrested development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris fedak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joshua gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony hale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zachary levi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=2708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blast got a chance to talk to Joshua Gomez who plays Morgan on the TV show "Chuck" and hear a little bit about the upcoming season from one of its actors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Blast got a chance to talk to Joshua Gomez who plays Morgan on the TV show &#8220;Chuck&#8221; and hear a little bit about the upcoming season from one of its actors. Here&#8217;s what we had to say:</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: So how goes shooting?</strong></p>
<p>JG: It goes well. We&#8217;re having a blast. It&#8217;s totally just a pleasure and so much fun to come to work and work on this set because it&#8217;s a great set. It&#8217;s a fun set.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Does Morgan get to get into the action a little bit (in season two)? Maybe?</strong></p>
<p>JG: He gets into his own action. He doesn&#8217;t go out in any of the Chuck world stuff as of yet, and I don&#8217;t know if he ever will, though I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d love it, between you and I.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: I think we&#8217;d love it too.</strong></p>
<p>JG: Yeah. Some of the action comes to him at the Buy More whether inadvertently, like he doesn&#8217;t know, or like the rest of the stuff gets mixed up at the Buy More. And then there&#8217;s a few things that are like things that are specifically centered around the &#8220;ËœB&#8217; story and the Buy More and sort of Morgan and some enemies, but like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1476939/">Michael Strahan</a> from the New York Giants, and he kind of plays a big jock guy or whatever and him and Morgan get into it. So he gets into his own trouble at the Buy More.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What about him and Anna, because that kind of tapered off at the end of season one. Does that continue into season two?</strong></p>
<p>JG: It does. Yeah, it definitely does. And so is the fun little romance. It&#8217;s pretty bizarre. She&#8217;s definitely the uh&#8230; she wears the pants, or leggings.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: The short skirts in the relationship?</strong></p>
<p>JG: She wears the short skirts and leggings in the relationship. Yeah, so it&#8217;s pretty funny. Exactly. Everyone kind of wasn&#8217;t sure, well, what happened? And I think that was a lot to do with the strike. I think that those episodes weren&#8217;t as fleshed out as they could be because they only had to go off of the outline that they really had through whatever episode. I think that&#8217;s the reason why the last episodes are kind of like &#8220;Huh?&#8221; We are kind of where we left off where Morgan and Anna were at. There&#8217;s some fun stuff that happens between those two. It&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: I was a little worried. I was like &#8220;Did I miss something in here?&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>JG: Yeah, I think a lot of people felt that way. Exactly. When we first started to do little tests for the beginning of this season, that was one of the first questions. It was like &#8220;What the hell is going on with you and Anna; where did she go?&#8221; I think everyone was kind of like hoping that that wasn&#8217;t going away. So yeah, no, it&#8217;s good.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What about Morgan and Ellie? </strong></p>
<p>JG: Mmm, now we&#8217;re getting down to it. No, at this point I think it&#8217;s just he&#8217;s good with Anna and Ellie&#8217;s now engaged with Captain Awesome. But I think in Morgan&#8217;s brain, it&#8217;s just one of those childhood absolute infatuations, first love kind of deal, and she&#8217;ll always be that. I think he loves Anna, and I think all that&#8217;s cool, but I think that if Ellie was like &#8220;Hey, what&#8217;s up Morgan?&#8221; he might not hesitate. I think he&#8217;ll always love her in that young boy&#8217;s dream kind of thing. It&#8217;s very sweet and very childlike love.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Especially in the first few episodes of the first season you definitely got that puppy dog sort of &#8220;Oh, you want to hang out?&#8221; type of thing.</strong></p>
<p>JG: It&#8217;s less of that now between Morgan and Ellie. It&#8217;s almost brother and sister, and that&#8217;s exactly what it was. She was like big sister to both he and Chuck. So I think that there&#8217;s more of that now Anna&#8217;s around. I kind of get off her case a little bit. I think there&#8217;s still a sweetness between (Morgan and Ellie) that&#8217;s unspoken. It comes out here and there. But yeah, it&#8217;s good. Another great relationship.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: I heard Josh Schwartz talk at Comic-con and I believe he said that this season takes up pretty much right where the last season ended. Is that true?</strong></p>
<p>JG: Yeah.<strong></strong></p>

<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/attachment/nup_131113_0326/' title='nup_131113_0326'><img width="100" height="100" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nup_131113_0326-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="nup_131113_0326" title="nup_131113_0326" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/attachment/nup_108633_1144/' title='nup_108633_1144'><img width="100" height="100" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nup_108633_1144-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="nup_108633_1144" title="nup_108633_1144" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/attachment/nup_108633_0955/' title='NUP_108633_0955'><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nup_108633_0955.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="NUP_108633_0955" title="NUP_108633_0955" /></a>

<p><strong>BLAST: Can you kind of set us up for where we&#8217;re going to be starting episode one?</strong></p>
<p>JG: Basically the government has kind of constructed another working Intersect. So it does pick up where we left off which is that &#8220;Okay now what happens?&#8221; Is John Casey going to get the orders to, once the Intersect is completed and fully operational, now what do we do with Chuck kind of a deal. Is he going to have to be eliminated or quarantined? I think that&#8217;s where we kind of left off and that&#8217;s exactly where we pick up with season two. Literally I think it picks up with Chuck being held out of a building and while he&#8217;s hanging there the audience will get a little recap through his panicked words. There&#8217;s not much of a gap there. It&#8217;s sort of, if the Intersect is completed, what&#8217;s going to become of Chuck? And part of that is kind of good; part of it is Chuck going like &#8220;Oh my Lord, to be free of this thing.&#8221; But I think he thinks that if the Intersect is finished, he&#8217;s a free man. He can go back to his normal life. That&#8217;s where we&#8217;ll probably pick up from.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: At the beginning, right when Chuck did download the Intersect, there was some talk of removing it. That tapered away though, and they just used him as a tool. Does that come back in this whole &#8220;We have a new Intersect&#8221; conversation? Or is it basically just &#8220;You&#8217;re going to die&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>JG: Not so much of a removal. The removal I don&#8217;t think worked and it never really comes up again. I think it&#8217;s basically &#8220;We can&#8217;t have two Intersects&#8221;. We can&#8217;t have some guy walking around knowing all these things in his head because that&#8217;s still way too much of a (danger). It doesn&#8217;t come down to removal as much as removal of him completely.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Do we have any new characters? Maybe in the Buy More or new agents that are coming that might stay for a little bit longer or become more main?</strong></p>
<p>JG: Yeah. Most of the characters that you&#8217;re probably familiar with in the first season become a little bit more present. Most of the Nerd Herd and obviously like Anna and Jeff and Lester and Big Mike and all those guys are recurring regulars or regulars or whatever. They&#8217;re going to be playing a little bit more of a role in the whole thing especially at the Buy More I think. And then of course <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0355024/">Tony Hale</a> comes on; Tony Hale from Arrested Development, who is just so much fun and such a cool dude and so funny. He comes on to play this really cool character called Emmett Milbarge who is brought in from corporate Buy More as an efficiency expert and as he spends more time at the Buy More you realize we are not friends. That&#8217;s the cool stuff. We had <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0496934/">C.S. Lee</a> played Harry Tang and he was great character for the Buy More and an adversary for Chuck and Morgan at the Buy More. Emmett&#8217;s that kind of character. This story is playing out much more like Morgan has&#8230; I hate to use the word &#8220;grown up,&#8221; because not quite yet, but he&#8217;s maturing and taking on a little more responsibility, he gets a little bit more responsibility, people are now coming to him. Chuck&#8217;s by now left the Buy More because I think the spy world is really starting to consume him a little bit more this season. At the Buy More, people like the Nerd Herd and the gang and stuff are turning to Morgan now and he does the best he can in his Morgan way, and so it usually leads to some fun times at the Buy More. And so Emmett becomes this really cool adversary for Morgan and the guys and Tony just fit right in and is just great right off the bat. It&#8217;s fun.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What kind of character does Tony play? Is he channeling the whole &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrfIjYACPU0">Buster</a>&#8221; persona or is he going to be more along the lines of a serious [character]?</strong></p>
<p>JG: Well, both. He&#8217;s definitely a new deal but he plays his character so well it&#8217;s easy to imagine that this is the guy that if he finds a piece of lint in his pocket he would blow a gasket. Emmett is this like ridiculously anal [character] and takes his job way too serious and the rest of us couldn&#8217;t take it any less serious, including Big Mike. You&#8217;ll definitely find some elements of [Buster], but I think it&#8217;s a whole new deal and a whole new character. It&#8217;s pretty funny. It&#8217;s pretty good stuff.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: So he&#8217;s the big new character; there&#8217;s no one else super surprising?</strong></p>
<p>JG: He&#8217;s not until the fourth or fifth [episode] right now. He&#8217;s not in every episode. He doesn&#8217;t start the season off in the show but he eventually kind of comes in. As far as new characters though, nothing changes too much. As far as the spy world is concerned you still have Chuck, Casey, and Sarah, the three of them are sort of out there, so no one really gets added to that gang. A lot of cool guest stars though, a lot of people coming on board: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0003817/">Michael Clarke Duncan</a> and there&#8217;s an episode where <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0488662/">John Laroquette</a> plays an ex-spy who has to come in and teach Chuck how to be more suave and how to seduce women and once again, a great premise, a great actor coming in. And him and Zack together are just great because they&#8217;re both so freaking cool. So yeah, you got a lot of cool guest stars, but the cast&#8217;s pretty much the same as it was like I said with the addition of some recurring like Tony Hale. That&#8217;s about it. That&#8217;s about it so far.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: What about the plot? Is there a more definite destination that we&#8217;re going towards? Is there going to be a nemesis introduced?</strong></p>
<p>JG: What&#8217;s funny is that I tried to talk to the guys all the time, whether it be Josh Schwartz and mostly with Chris Fedak who I see a lot. I love trying to get answers out of them, the writing staff and stuff. But it&#8217;s like, they&#8217;ll give you little niblets. You know they have a plan. You know, they&#8217;ll pull out their Chuck bible and&#8230; I know they have their whole history ready to go. I think there&#8217;s going to be stuff they&#8217;re going to introduce, people they&#8217;re going to introduce, roads they&#8217;re going to go down, but I just don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re going to give it up to us. Every script that I get is the same as what you guys are going to be seeing every week, watching it. It&#8217;s just like &#8220;Okay, okay. Interesting, interesting.&#8221; I mean there&#8217;s a few things they&#8217;ll tell us in advance but as far as any big things like that where are we going to find out what really happened to Chuck&#8217;s parents or is his father alive and is he out there? I&#8217;m sure they have a map and a blueprint, but they sure as hell aren&#8217;t telling me.‚  But I&#8217;m sure whatever it is, it will be good. I think we&#8217;re shooting episode nine right now and there&#8217;s some kind of cool revelations and some cool things. And of course Bryce Larkin, who kind of is the nemesis, he&#8217;s popping in and out. There&#8217;s always Bryce lingering, kind of causing havoc, kind of helping Chuck and also hurting him at the same time. I would say that if there is a nemesis, it would still be Bryce Larkin. As far as anything new, again, perhaps, but I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p><strong>BLAST: Well once again, thanks for talking to us. We look forward to watching Morgan wreak havoc at the Buy More.</strong></p>
<p>JG: [laughing] Well, you will. You will.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/entertainment/an-interviw-with-chucks-joshua-gomez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

