<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blast: Boston&#039;s Online Magazine &#187; cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blastmagazine.com/tag/cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blastmagazine.com</link>
	<description>Music, movies, tv, video games, tech, food, drink, young, hip, and sexy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hulu is second largest content provider</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/09/hulu-is-second-largest-content-provider/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/09/hulu-is-second-largest-content-provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Cloutier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci/Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=24537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hulu passes Time Warner in size of viewership.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Hulu_logo.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-24540" title="Hulu_logo" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Hulu_logo-300x117.png" alt="Hulu_logo" width="300" height="117" /></a>Hulu continues to permeate society as the video and TV content medium of choice for the internet savvy. The<a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/04/hulu-gains-ground/"> last time we looked at them</a>, they were gaining serious ground. So, just how â€œbigâ€ is <a href="http://www.hulu.com">Hulu</a>?</p>
<p>According to comScore some 38 million people used Hulu this July. This surpasses Business Insiders estimate of 34 million subscribers for Time Warner Cable, the United States second largest cable company. To put this all in perspective Comcast, the USâ€™s largest cable company, has about 62 million viewers. Viewership statistics for the cable companies were derived by multiplying the number of subscribers by 2.59, which is what the census bureau tells us is the average person per household.</p>
<div id="attachment_24538" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Hulu-chart.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-24538" title="Hulu chart" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Hulu-chart-300x224.gif" alt="Some numbers to consider." width="300" height="224" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Some numbers to consider.</p></div>
<p>This means that Hulu is effectively the second largest provider of television content for Americans. If only the internet could prove a reliable cash cow for producers Hulu could easily be the platform of the future; however, for now they will have to be content with second place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/09/hulu-is-second-largest-content-provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast on the cusp of its own Internet TV?</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/04/comcast-on-the-cusp-of-its-own-internet-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/04/comcast-on-the-cusp-of-its-own-internet-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Uribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci/Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fancast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=12710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, Karin Gilford, chief of Comcast&#8217;s online division, told PCWorld.com about the latest move by  the cable giant. &#8220;The Comcast On Demand online video service will allow Comcast subscribers to sign in with a username and password, then access any  standard or premium cable content that their cable subscription entitles them to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, Karin Gilford, chief of Comcast&#8217;s online division, told <a href="http://PCWorld.com">PCWorld.com</a> about the latest move by  the cable giant. &#8220;The Comcast On Demand online video service will allow Comcast subscribers to sign in with a username and password, then access any  standard or premium cable content that their cable subscription entitles them to  watch.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://Fancast.com">Fancast</a> has always provided VOD, over 3,000 film and TV titles are currently available, with pricing starting from $3.99 for  24-hour film rentals, $9.99 for film purchases, and $1.99 for TV shows.The  difference being, with it&#8217;s recent push in <a title="Report on PCMAG.com" href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2345760,00.asp" target="_blank">both the hardware</a> and now content, it&#8217;s stands a chance against the likes of  Hulu.com and Veoh.com, among other video sites, when it begins streaming it for  free of charge. Available only to those whom already have an cable subscription  with them.</p>
<p>While no specifics were mentioned (When will I be able to  watch any show from any cable network at any time?), and the issue of recent <a title="Blast's article on usage caps" href="/the-magazine/technology/2008/10/comcasts-straw-drinks-your-bandwidth/" target="_blank">bandwidth usage caps</a> wasn&#8217;t addressed, the most we can be sure  of is Comcast&#8217;s cautious steps into the wild west of the digital realm. With a  complex system of how to pay for all the content it&#8217;s going to provide,  subscribers to Comcast should look forward to milking this deal before it will  surely become a paid-for-service entirely. Who needs Blockbuster or Netflix when  you got this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2009/04/comcast-on-the-cusp-of-its-own-internet-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast&#8217;s straw drinks your bandwidth</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2008/10/comcasts-straw-drinks-your-bandwidth/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2008/10/comcasts-straw-drinks-your-bandwidth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Uribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms of use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=3898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The day has come for all Comcast High-Speed residential Internet customers: You officially have a usage cap. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day has come for all Comcast High-Speed residential Internet customers: You officially have a usage cap.</p>
<p>The &#8220;customer-defined&#8221; usage limit is 250GB a month. ComcastÂ says it&#8217;s &#8220;an extremely large amount of data, much more than a typical residential customer uses on a monthly basis.&#8221;</p>
<p>They include in their Terms of Service that this roughly constitutes:Â <br />
Â <br />
* Send more than 50 million plain text emails (at 5 KB/email);Â <br />
* Download 62,500 songs (at 4 MB/song); orÂ <br />
* Download 125 standard definition movies (at 2 GB/movie).Â <br />
Â <br />
Comcast also released some of their current customer usage data, which puts the average residential Internet traffic downloads at 2-3 GB a month.</p>
<p>You shouldÂ notice some key word usage in the statement, that will be coming as a bill stuffer, as harmless and not worthy of another glance. &#8220;Managing the network is essential as Comcast works to <em>promote</em> the use and enjoyment of the Internet by all of its customers. The company uses reasonable network management practices that are <em>consistent</em> with industry standards. Comcast tries to use tools and technologies that are minimally intrusive and, in its <em>independent judgment</em> guided by industry experience, among the <em>best in class</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The italics are mine. With such mitigating word usage, Comcast is trying to drive the point to it&#8217;s docile customers that it&#8217;s doing this for your good, and the good of the network.Â <br />
Â <br />
To all the Comcast customers who just check their email,Â you won&#8217;t be reading this unless it&#8217;s forwarded, andÂ youÂ won&#8217;t care about the limit.</p>
<p>To the people who read news and emailsÂ and visit Myspace or Facebook, you might think about it for a second, but disregard it.</p>
<p>For the users who email, social network, game online and download, a notice about this usage cap will hold more weight.</p>
<p>Finally, there&#8217;s the Comcast customers whom utilize the Internet more efficiently and can do all of the activities above while running a P2P agent in the background. These users know exactly what it means to them.</p>
<p>So why should anyone who doesn&#8217;t live on the Internet care? The speed of technological advancement dictates that pretty soon, this &#8220;massive&#8221; usage cap will become a noose we so quickly placed on ourselves. With the advent of not only high-definition video on demand, and digital downloads, there are a score of otherÂ programs thatÂ use the bandwidth while people just check their email, or just check their networking sites.</p>
<p>Even websites have become more content rich. Heavy text news sites have become a multi-media room. What 56K once could handle isÂ a neanderthal-like usage now with higher speeds becoming standard. As Internet speeds rise, and our daily lives connect more to the Internet, the usage cap will seem more and more stringent.Â <br />
Â <br />
&#8220;Though the proposed cap is relatively high, it will increasingly ensnare more users as technology continues its natural progression,&#8221; said Free Press Research Director S. Derek Turner.Â <br />
Â <br />
For those Blast Magazine readers live on the Internet and are worried about what would happen if you crossed the line, don&#8217;t worry. &#8220;As part of our pre-existing policy, we will continue to contact the top users of our high-speed Internet service and ask them to curb their usage.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;If a customer uses more than 250GB and is one of the top users of our service, he or she may be contacted by Comcast to notify them of excessive use. At that time, we&#8217;ll tell them exactly how much data per month they had used. We know from experience the vast majority of customers we ask to curb usage do so voluntarily.&#8221;</p>
<p>For now anyway, although the Internet is abuzz with future network shutdowns and or including excessive bandwidth usage fines, all of this is on top of the confirmed diurnal network bandwidth-throttling practices that Comcast got in trouble for.<br />
Â <br />
For the non-Comcast customer, all this should be a red flag. Comcast clearly states in their ToS that, &#8220;The need to engage in network management is not limited to Comcast. In fact, all large Internet service providers manage their networks. Many of them use the same or similar tools that Comcast does.&#8221; Comcast isÂ leading Internet service provider, so it&#8217;s only rational to expect other major ISPs to follow suit, especially if they see any Comcast practices as a &#8220;success&#8221;.</p>
<p>Enjoy the gallows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2008/10/comcasts-straw-drinks-your-bandwidth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
