<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blast Magazine&#187; Audio/Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blastmagazine.com/category/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blastmagazine.com</link>
	<description>Video games, movies, music, and smart magazine journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:44:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marantz SR7005 receiver review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/marantz-sr7005-receiver-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/marantz-sr7005-receiver-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marantz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[receiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SR7005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surround sound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=64542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right on the money]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=B003R7KMRY&#038;ref=tf_til&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=FFFFFF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;float:right;margin-left:5px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>If you&#8217;re doing well in this economy, and you really want to blow the world away with your audio and video, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003R7KMRY?tag=blasmaga-20" rel="nofollow">check out the Marantz SR7005 receiver</a>. </p>
<p>There is simply nothing better on the market right now. </p>
<p>Some people who spend a lot of money on audio/video products will say &#8220;no, Denon is better,&#8221; but they are essentially the same thing in different cases.</p>
<p>The SR7005 has six HDMI inputs, including one in the front, iPhone/iPod integration/<a href="http://usa.denon.com/us/Airplayus/index.html">AirPlay receiver</a>, network media (Windows 7 compatible) playing and multiple  zones to power speakers in different rooms.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/SR7005_B-front-open_WHITE_BG.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/SR7005_B-front-open_WHITE_BG-300x145.jpg" alt="" title="SR7005_B-front-open_WHITE_BG" width="300" height="145" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-64547" /></a>OK so the catch is it&#8217;s $1500, but when you figure out that you spend about triple that on speakers, a TV, video game systems, Blu-ray, etc., it gets less scary.</p>
<p>The unit is advertised as a 7.1 system, but I&#8217;m very happy using it as a 5.2 system, as it has two subwoofer outputs. </p>
<p>As our friend <a href="http://www.ssavi.us.com/">Kirk Hobbs from South Shore Audio Video Installation</a> points out, if you are going to go 7.1 or increase your speakers in any way, it&#8217;s best to start from the front. You don&#8217;t necessarily need four speakers behind you. Start with the basic 5.1 system, and add two additional front speakers, set above your first ones. This is especially true if you have high ceilings and are mounting speakers to the wall with the television.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/L_SR7005_back.png"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/L_SR7005_back-300x163.png" alt="" title="L_SR7005_back" width="300" height="163" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-64544" /></a>You have <a href="http://us.marantz.com/us/Products/Pages/ProductDetails.aspx?CatId=AVReceivers&#038;SubCatId=0&#038;ProductId=SR7005">plenty of room on the SR7005</a>, because it supports up to 11 speakers in three different zones.</p>
<p>Setup was a breeze. The on-screen menu makes life easier. Plug everything in, then assign the correct names to your devices. Then plug in the included microphone, which automatically starts the speaker setup. Let it run through its paces, and your surround sound will be optimized automatically to the architecture of your room.</p>
<p>AirPlay is certainly one of the best features, especially for iPhone users, you can literally press a few buttons and send music and movies to their television. Windows 7 connectivity adds a similar bonus.</p>
<p>With its network connectivity features, the SR7005 also allows you to access Pandora and similar music services.  The only thing I was looking for was Netflix. Perhaps in a future firmware upgrade&#8230;</p>
<p>Audio quality blew me away. The unit&#8217;s seven discrete, 125 watt amplifiers really do the job. Bass is powerful, high notes are clear with no distortion. Voices sound like they are in the room with you. </p>
<p>It also handles the full suite of Dolby technology: TrueHD, Digital Plus, Pro Logic IIz, IIx, II, Virtual Speaker, and Dolby Headphone as well as DTS features including  HD Master Audio, High Resolution Audio, ES Discete6.1, Matrix6.1, Neo:6, 96/24, Express, and Neural Surround.</p>
<p>The unit is also sized right. It&#8217;s no bigger than any other receiver. It fits in your rack or TV cabinet just fine with the cable box and PS3.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for a high-quality choice to focus your home theater around, the SR7005 is right on the money.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/marantz-sr7005-receiver-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orb Audio &#8220;Computer Unit&#8221; review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/orb-audio-computer-unit-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/orb-audio-computer-unit-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amplifier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orb audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surround sound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=58518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All function no flash -- but is that such a bad thing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-58519" title="computersystem1 highres" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/computersystem1-highres-300x288.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="288" /><a href="http://www.orbaudio.com/">Orb Audio</a> puts out a bangin&#8217; audiophile-approved sound in a tiny package.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s best about the company&#8217;s products is that they&#8217;re infinitely expandable &#8212; from 2.0 left-right speakers to full-on 7.2 monsters. You can buy two speakers for your setup, and when you&#8217;re ready to expand, you can keep the little orbs coming until you have your dream unit.</p>
<p>In a way, this translates to their &#8220;Computer Unit,&#8221; which Blast had a while to test out lately. But it&#8217;s not a perfect marriage.</p>
<p>The Orb Computer Unit is build on two speakers and a Pyle Pro PTA 2 2X40 watt stereo amplifier. By rewiring the orbs, you can bang out an amazing stereo experience, with up to eight speakers wired in four-unit pairs, but since the product is built on a two-channel amplifier, you can&#8217;t go beyond the two channels without scrapping the amp and buying a brand new one that can do 3-4-5-6-7 channels of audio.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-58520" title="Hammered Earth single high res" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Hammered-Earth-single-high-res-300x250.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="250" />The Pyle amplifier also doesn&#8217;t have an output for a subwoofer, so you have to run speaker wire from the amp, to the subwoofer, to the speakers if you want some real bass. That gets clunky quickly.</p>
<p>There also isn&#8217;t any design ingenuity. The product is just two orb speakers and the stock amplifier. If this was really a computer/standalone unit, Orb should have scrapped the &#8220;expandability&#8221; concept and engineered a modular product with an amplifier&#8217;s guts, its orb speakers, and some flashy casing.</p>
<p>On the flip side, the 40-watt amp is plenty of power for the Orbs, though they can certainly handle at least 100-watts. And to be even more fair, the product sounds fantastic. Music, gaming, and movies all sound crisp, clear, and well-defined. The Orb unit sounds better than most standard computer speakers that you could buy in the store.</p>
<p>But it is more expensive than most, at $299. You have to be pretty dedicated to your computer audio to shell out $300 for speakers.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in Orb, and you should be, I&#8217;d invest in a surround unit. An Orb Audio Mod1 Plus 5.1 system at $999 is pretty moderate when you think about what people invest in five speakers and a subwoofer.</p>
<p><em>Keep your computer performing at top speed with RegCure <a href="http://www.paretologic.com/products/regcure/index.aspx" target="_blank">registry cleaner</a> from ParetoLogic.</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/orb-audio-computer-unit-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JVC HA-NC120 headphones review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/jvc-ha-nc120-headphones-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/jvc-ha-nc120-headphones-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jvc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise canceling headphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=53860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We went on an airplane to test them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/HA-NC120.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/HA-NC120-300x156.jpg" alt="" title="HA-NC120" width="300" height="156" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-53861" /></a>With the holidays upon us, you may be struggling to find something for that frequent traveler or music junkie on your holiday buying list. These may have you covered.</p>
<p>Any frequent traveler will agree that there’s nothing worse than trying to relax to your favorite album or movie, only to have that audio be replaced by the roaring sound of the plane&#8217;s engines or a crying baby. Look no further than to a pair of noise canceling headphones, which may be perfect companion for that frequent traveler, music junkie or anyone wishing to hear the beauty of their collections without background noise getting in the way.</p>
<p>The first thing any shopper should be concerned about is the price and at $79.99, JVC’s HA-NC120 noise canceling headphones are a steal for the quality of sound they deliver and their overall performance. </p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&#038;bc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;npa=1&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;m=amazon&#038;f=ifr&#038;asins=B000U07C1U" style="width:120px;height:240px;float:right;margin-left:5px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe><br />
As you set your eyes on a pair of these NC-120 headphones, one can’t help but notice the compact and sleek design of the product with its an all black and shiny, mirror like finish with chrome trim running along the outline of product. There are two switches on the device, which can be found at the bottom each individual headphone and enable/disable volume limit and function as a power switch. Under the left headphone, the product features a nice retractable 3.5 millimeter headphone cord which can be extended by simply pulling out on the cord and retracted by pressing a small button which sucks the wire back into the headphones where it is stored nicely and out of the way. This feature alone is great because it makes for easy and quick stowage by virtually eliminating the cord, saving you the time and hassle having roll and pack away the cord.</p>
<p>My favorite feature is that they can be folded down to about half their original size, allowing for easy portability.  When not in use, the NC120 headphones can be folded in half and the individual headphones can then be swiveled and folded inward condensing the product to fit easily in a small purse, glove compartment or forward set compartment.</p>
<p>Sound quality was overall very good, considering the relatively low price and the small design of the product. When in use, music sounded crisp and lifelike, and the base levels were much better than I initially expected from a product in this price range. </p>
<p>JVC claims these headphones are capable of 88 percent ambient noise reduction, and I decided to put this claim to the test and take these headphones along with me on an eight hour flight to Europe and see just how well they blocked out the loud engine roar and passenger cabin noise.  The results actually stacked up to be pretty well, and I found the headphones did a decent job at removing background roar. One thing to keep in mind with these headphones is loud background noise is only eliminated when music is playing, so you might find ear plugs to be a better solution if your trying to sleep in say a noisy environment.</p>
<p>In conclusion, I was very much impressed by both the performance and design of this product for its price range. At $79.99, this product is definitely worth the money and is an overall great set of headphones that sound excellent, look great and are a breeze to travel with for the money. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/jvc-ha-nc120-headphones-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cambridge SoundWorks i525 review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/docking-audio/cambridge-soundworks-i525-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/docking-audio/cambridge-soundworks-i525-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Docking Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cambridge soundworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=53009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot and cold on this one, with certification issues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/51NUFhol6lL.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/51NUFhol6lL-300x300.jpg" alt="" title="Hot and cold on the i525" width="300" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-53010" /></a>I&#8217;ve long been a sucker for certain audio brands. Here in Boston, there&#8217;s no shortage of original talent, including Bose, Cambridge SoundWorks, and Tivoli.</p>
<p>Nationally, Altec Lansing&#8217;s long history for producing superior sounding products makes them stand out. Even their cheaper products stand out. The audio system on my computer at home is still an <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/2008/04/01/altec-lansing-soundbar/">Altec Lansing SoundBar</a>. The SoundBar, from 2008, has lasted longer than my last three computers, and I have access to nearly every computer speaker system out there.</p>
<p>And I feel the same about Cambridge SoundWorks products, even since their buyout by Creative. SoundWorks&#8217;s Newton speakers are divine. The company&#8217;s compact radios sound excellent and rival other tiny sound systems that promise big sound.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what pains me about the SoundWorks i525, an iPod docking radio/alarm clock. By itself, the audio quality and construction make it a great choice. That&#8217;s how we should base audio products, right? Sound. Construction. </p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=cambridge%20soundworks%20ipod&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=&#038;lc1=3366FF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>Well not quite. The i525 was not designed with the iPhone in mind. It plays and charges the iPhone, but Cambridge Soundworks did not get the product certified by Apple. A warning pops up on my iPhone 4&#8242;s screen when I dock it with the i525, warning me that it&#8217;s not optimized for my phone.</p>
<p>The product is fully functional, but WiFi and cellular phone activity can cause audio distortion and interference.</p>
<p>&#8220;The SoundWorks i525 will charge and function with iPhone. The Optimization flag appears as we are not yet certified for iPhone support. The product is fully functional with iPhone; however,&#8221; said Maria Cataldo, a spokeswoman for Cambridge Soundworks. &#8220;Please note, since we are not yet certified &#8216;for use with an iPhone,&#8217; the user is presented with a warning that the iPhone may cause interference with the radio and offers you the choice to enter Airplane Mode. If the user does not enter Airplane Mode, the phone will still operate normally, but may introduce some interference from the radio when communicating with cell towers.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the device&#8217;s defense, I ran it through a few hours of trials and did not encounter any audio distortion.</p>
<p>Should we judge the i525 by this? On one hand, no. The i525 outperforms many similarly priced bedside iPhone docks. At $149.99, it&#8217;s the cheapest radio ever produced by Cambridge SoundWorks. it has an AM/FM radio that gets clear reception, and the company&#8217;s proprietary Smart Volume feature normalizes volume levels between songs, so you don&#8217;t get one really loud song and one quiet song.</p>
<p>But on the other hand, the company really needs to get that certification thing taken care of. The dock needs to fully play nice with what&#8217;s docking on it. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/docking-audio/cambridge-soundworks-i525-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iHome iP3 review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/ihome-ip3-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/ihome-ip3-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ihome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=50301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, but not worth $200]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ihomeip3-gg.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-50302" title="ihomeip3-gg" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ihomeip3-gg-300x193.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="193" /></a>When you think of the <a href="/tag/ihome">iHome</a> brand, chances are your familiar with their compact clock radio speaker systems. These inexpensive devices sound great and scored highly in our reviews, but lately the company has been stepping things up a bit, entering into an entirely new territory focused more on audio performance. </p>
<p>The iHome iP1 debuted the company’s new line of performance-based audio products, named to be their “Studio Line.” Being the first product in this new line, the iP1 showed consumers that the company means business and their latest “Studio Line” iP3 is no exception.</p>
<p>Offering up to 50 watts of power along with Bongiovi Digital Power Station technology which specializes to better enhance and restore lost details due to audio compression, the iP3, iPod/iPhone audio system packs a punch of power and is sure not to go unnoticed. Music on the device sounded great and audio levels were excellent for the small overall size of the unit. If loudness is what you are looking for, you will be very pleased with the iP3 as the unit cranks and will just blow you away in terms of volume, despite the idea you might get from its small form factor.</p>
<p>The Bongiovi Digital Power Station technology is exclusive to both the iP3 and iP1 and is without a doubt worth mentioning. Sound quality when using the technology was very good as opposed to when the technology was turned off which was dull and almost computer speaker sounding. We decided to really put the technology to the test by playing a few of our favorite tracks and toggling on and off the Bongiovi technology just to see how much of a difference it made. When enabled, music sounded loud, crisp and had a strong base and when switched off, tones sounded dull and low quality.</p>
<p>From first glance, the product offers a basic, yet compact design featuring an all black body with a transparent border that obtrudes from out and around the speakers. This makes for a unique design allowing the product to be placed practically anywhere and blend in with the surrounding background. On the front of the unit, between the two speakers houses an adjustable iPod dock that no longer requires an iPods inserts &#8212; definitely a nice plus. Toward the bottom of the system, you will find the audio controls, which from left to right include the Bongiovi on/off button, power button, and volume up/down controls. Finally along the backside of the unit you will find a power port, component video out connection and a line in port, giving you the ability to connect other devices to the unit rather than just an iPod.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re very pleased to see iHome included a component video out port on this device. If you are unfamiliar with what this is, it allows for the video on your iPod to be displayed on an external television or other type of display.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=ihome&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=3366FF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>While the unit does sound great, there are some shortfalls to mention, with the price being the number one con of this device. At almost $200, this product is quite costly and we&#8217;re not sure it’s worth its high price tag. The iP3 sounds nice, but it has some tough competition out there, the Sony MHC EC709iP being on top of the list. This 180-watt system is $50 less and offers some added functionality like an AM/FM tuner, which isn’t available on the IP3. </p>
<p>It would have also been nice to have seen support for the iHome+Sleep application like featured on the A5. The iP3 does not offer any type of alarm clock functionality, which is what made iHome famous in the first place</p>
<p>Overall we’re pleased with the performance, design and portability of the iP3, but it&#8217;s not perfect and lacks a few features that should come with a hefty price tag. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/ihome-ip3-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joby Gorillapod review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/joby-gorillapod-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/joby-gorillapod-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Mullins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tripod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=50242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not your average tripod]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Gorillapod-Mag-1.jpg"></a>The folks over at Joby were kind enough to send this Blair Witch style video-taker a nifty device. The Gorillapod Video can be placed <a rel="attachment wp-att-50706" href="http://blastmagazine.com/2010/10/04/joby-gorillapod-review/jobyvideo/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-50706" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/jobyvideo-145x300.png" alt="" width="145" height="300" /></a>anywhere with its ridiculously strong magnetic feet and positional legs that you can twist in any direction or attach to just about any fixture. Joby suggests that “video seasickness be gone” with either your point-and-shoot cameras with video capabilities or mini/pocket camcorders.</p>
<p>The Gorillapod Video has a compact 7-inch design which allows for easy toting and storing. The Omni-directional aluminum positioning video head allows you to direct the camera in any possible direction with a smooth 360-degree pan and 135-degree tilt. You can easily attach your camera to the Gorillapod Video by screwing in the plate to the camera and sliding it into the base. The quick release button allows you to quickly remove your camera making the Gorillapod beyond easy to use. You can even use it for still shots for when you need that 3rd pair of hands.</p>
<p>The Gorillapod Video definitely ranks as a favorite little gadget with its simple yet unique design and easy to use features. You may even find yourself taking more videos since they will actually be worthy of viewing at a later date.  For under $30 at the <a href="http://www.joby.com/">Joby website</a>, you can’t beat it. You can also find them in many brick-and-mortar stores throughout the US by using the search feature on their website to find the one closest to you.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/joby-gorillapod-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wicked Audio Wicked Empire WE-8803 Earbuds review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/wicked-audio-wicked-empire-we-8803-earbuds-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/wicked-audio-wicked-empire-we-8803-earbuds-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earbud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=50003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth a try]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>There are always those electronics that are a pain to shop for, especially those that you&#8217;re not able to test out prior to purchasing. Headphones and earbuds are prime examples. Sure you can return them if your not satisfied, but how many trips to the store are you going to be willing to make before you become frustrated? Hopefully we can help simplify the process here at Blast with our review on Wicked Audio&#8217;s Wicked Empire WE-8803 in-ear earbuds.</p>
<p>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/wicked-audio-wicked-empire-we-8803-earbuds-review/attachment/wicked-audio-we-8803-with-ipod/' title='Wicked Audio WE-8803 with iPod' rel='gallery-50003'><img width="100" height="100" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Wicked-Audio-WE-8803-with-iPod-100x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Wicked Audio WE-8803 with iPod" title="Wicked Audio WE-8803 with iPod" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/wicked-audio-wicked-empire-we-8803-earbuds-review/attachment/wicked-empire-we-8803-product-box/' title='Wicked Empire WE-8803 Product Box' rel='gallery-50003'><img width="100" height="100" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Wicked-Empire-WE-8803-Product-Box-100x100.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Wicked Empire WE-8803 Product Box" title="Wicked Empire WE-8803 Product Box" /></a>
</p>
<p>From the clear little window on the box, you really can&#8217;t help but notice the sleek design and nice styling of the product. With an all black finish, long cord length, and an eye-catching design/symbol on the ends of the buds, its no wonder why the product is so eye appealing.</p>
<p>While looks are important, sound quality is crucial and can make or break a product like this, but the product delivers well for its price range. We were very impressed with the sound quality for these small mid-priced earbuds. Both base and treble sounded great, and the earbuds had no problem reaching louder volumes without distorting all that much. </p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=wicked%20earbuds&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=&#038;lc1=3366FF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>One thing however, is that the product may not be for everyone especially with people with odd ear sizes and people that are planning to exercise while using these earbuds. We noticed when running or fast walking with the earbuds in, that they slid around a little. This creates slightly annoying pounding noise.</p>
<p>The product retails for $39.99, and you can find them cheaper on Amazon and other online outlets.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/wicked-audio-wicked-empire-we-8803-earbuds-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iHome iP90 review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/docking-audio/ihome-ip90-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/docking-audio/ihome-ip90-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Docking Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ihome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=47682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, small]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>We&#8217;ve been really pleased lately with some of the new products from <a href="/tag/ihome">iHome</a>. We love all the improvements and it seems like the company has been innovating a lot and the iP90 is no exception.</p>
<p>The iP90 is a Dual Alarm Clock Radio and also functions as an iPod speaker system. Simply place your iPod or iPhone onto the dock and the product will instantly start charging it and allow you to listen to some of your favorite tunes through the built in stereo quality speakers, which surprisingly sound very good for such a small unit.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=ihome%20ip90&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>As soon as I unpacked the iP90, the first thing I noticed was its very sharp appearance, featuring an all black design with silver trim along the front, which accents the product very nicely. As you glance at the face of the iP90, you can&#8217;t help but notice the large glimmering LCD screen and the two stereo speakers, in which are covered the black-wired speaker grill. As you work your way to the very top, you&#8217;ll notice an array of backlit glowing, large sized buttons that are very easy to see perform well. On the back of the iHome, you really find anything interesting there besides a line in jack, power port, FM and AM antenna ports, the set time zone and the manual clock set/time sync buttons.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Out-of-Box.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Out-of-Box-300x253.jpg" alt="" title="Out of Box" width="300" height="253" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-47683" /></a>Aside from design, performance is what really matters. So how does this product rack up? Music playing from the iPod dock through the built in stereo speakers sounded impressive for the small device size. There was a good amount of base, tones sounded loud and clear and when I increased the master volume, I really didn&#8217;t hear much distortion at all, which again is a nice plus.</p>
<p>When using the duel alarm clock, I found it worked well and when pressed and held the settings are very customizable, which is superb. Users can set the time they wish to wake up, select whether the alarm just be weekdays, weekends or seven days a week and then finally choose to wake up to either the buzzer, playlist, iPod or the Radio. Then when the alarm does sound, the unit will gradually increase the volume over a period of time, so you wont be startled out of bed, which I really like. Also, for those of you who can&#8217;t get out of bed and relay on the snooze button, you&#8217;ll be pleased to know its located at the center front of the device.</p>
<p>A nice touch on the iP90 is sleep mode, which lets you gradually fall sleep to your favorite audio. Simply set the sleep timer from 120, 90, 60, 30 or 15 minutes and the iHome will gradually lower the music and shut off once you reach the allotted time. Other notable features include: fade in sound, a play/pause button directly on the unit and on remote, ability to skip songs using the plus/minus toggle, daylight savings time and time sync switch, battery backup and more.</p>
<p>I was also very pleased with included the remote control. Not only is it well built, feels great in the hand, but it allows you to control almost everything the unit does from a distance. I&#8217;m very glad to see such a functional remote, since on my prior iHome iH6 unit this wasn&#8217;t the case.</p>
<p>A few disappointments I had with the unit were its large depth and the fact that the input/line in button doesn&#8217;t list the iPod as a source; Instead, I found to get to the iPod source you have to press the pay/pause button. This isn&#8217;t entirely a big deal, but I&#8217;m not sure why iHome doesn&#8217;t list the iPod as a source there and why the unit is so large in the rear. One small thing to note is the unit doesn&#8217;t come with every insert for the iPods that it supports. If in the box you don&#8217;t get the proper insert for your device you can order one the company. In my case, the unit didn&#8217;t ship with an insert for my first generation iPod Touch, so you have to place a call to order one.</p>
<p>Other than those small things, the iHome iP90 is sounds fantastic, is well priced, performs great and because of its relatively small size, it is ideal for college students living in dorms or for any room in that matter. The iHome iP90 is available for $99.99. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/docking-audio/ihome-ip90-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ableplanet NC300 Headphones review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/ableplanet-nc300-headphones-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/ableplanet-nc300-headphones-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ableplanet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=47351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Built well, but do they even work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/SAM_0929.jpg" alt="" title="SAM_0929" width="400" height="300" class="alignright size-full wp-image-47352" />So we&#8217;ve all been in one of those frustrating and utterly annoying situations when you are forced to sit next to some loud annoying person, whether it be at on the bus, train, airplane, doctors office, commute to/from work or even sometimes at home.  But before you decide to pull your hair out, or even ask that person if they would mind keeping it down so you can hear your self think or be able actually listen to some of your favorite tunes consider a longer look at our review of ableplanet&#8217;s True Fidelity NC300 noise canceling headphones.</p>
<p>Out of the box, the NC300 headphones include everything you need to get started using the headphones &#8212; except the iPod or MP3 player of course. The box contains the NC300 headphones, a hard protective carrying case, airplane adapter, AA battery and a 1/4&quot; home stereo adapter. With this, you will be glad to find that everything packs away easily in the included hard protective case for easy portability, so there wont be any lost cables or accessories.</p>
<p>The first question with headphones is always &#8220;how do they sound?&#8221; In my experience, after using the headphones for a while, I wasn&#8217;t all that impressed with the audio quality and noise cancellation for the $150 price tag. I found the audio when using the headphones to have more bass than normal and at times the voices were almost suppressed by the low tones. While keeping in mind that people often like heavy bass, it just seemed somewhat overpowering toward the vocals.</p>
<p>I did like the design of the product. The build quality of the headphones seems to be solid, besides the battery door being a little flimsy, but this shouldn&#8217;t be too much of an issue. </p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m impressed by the noise cancellation either; while it does filter out slight noises, you can still hear some background noise. There was also a slight hiss when using the noise cancellation, which was less noticeable when you&#8217;re listening to something loudly.</p>
<p>ableplanet&#8217;s True Fidelity NC300 noise canceling headphones are available for $149.99 in either white or black online from ableplanet&#8217;s <a href="http://ableplanet.com">website</a>. Audio quality wasn&#8217;t horrible, but I did feel it wasn&#8217;t on par of what you expect with a product in this price range. I feel the $150 price tag is way too steep for the product and the most I would pay for these headphones would be around eighty dollars. If your still interested in the NC300s, I definitely recommend you try them for yourself before you buy. You may even find the added base to be a plus, however for me, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m ready to dump my $10 JVC Gumy earbuds for the NC300 headphones just yet, although the solid build quality, comfort and the light weight was definitely a plus.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/ableplanet-nc300-headphones-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finis XtreaMP3 review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finis-xtreamp3-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finis-xtreamp3-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 19:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Murray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3 player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=45428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking for a fully waterproof alternative to the iPod for your workout?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="pods"></div>
<p>Last summer, I purchased my fifth iPod Nano in as many years.</p>
<p>Besides being a costly endeavor, it&#8217;s also annoying as shit.</p>
<p>Now, this has continued to happen to yours truly solely because I&#8217;m an avid runner who <em>needs </em>musical motivation, and more specifically, because I steadfastly refuse to leave my iPod at home when I head out for a run during a torrential downpour.</p>
<p>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finis-xtreamp3-review/attachment/xtream/' title='XtreaM' rel='gallery-45428'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/XtreaM-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="XtreaM" title="XtreaM" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finis-xtreamp3-review/attachment/xtream-2/' title='XtreaM-2' rel='gallery-45428'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/XtreaM-2-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="XtreaM-2" title="XtreaM-2" /></a>
</p>
<p>Yes, I know, I&#8217;m a stubborn ass who refuses to learn their lesson.</p>
<p>Still though, for the price that Apple is charging for those damn things, one would think that at this point they&#8217;d have made them, y&#8217;know, waterproof.</p>
<p>Thankfully, Finis XtreaMP3 is the answer to my recurring problem.</p>
<p>The XtreaMP3 is a 1GB MP3 player that is waterproof to depths of 15 feet. It comes with a surprisingly sturdy neoprene armband, and specialized waterproof earbuds that are roughly 8 thousand times more comfortable than the stock Apple earbuds you get with an iPod . The XtreaMP3 is also USB compatible for charging, and more importantly, for syncing up your music via iTunes (the easiest route) or via the drag n&#8217; drop process through Windows Explorer (the archaic way to go about it.)</p>
<p>So, while all of that sounds all well and good, you&#8217;re no doubt wondering (much like I was) is this thing ACTUALLY WATERPROOF?</p>
<p>Oh, indeed it is.</p>
<p>Seeing as the weather has been pretty nice around these parts as of late, I wasn&#8217;t able to put the XtreaMp3 through it&#8217;s paces during a rain filled run. So instead, I did the next best thing.</p>
<p>I wore it while taking a bath.</p>
<p>While sitting in my own tepid filth, I was pleased to hear that the sound quality of this unit was much better than I had anticipated. The highs are nice n&#8217; bright, and there&#8217;s just the right amount of bass. When I did the old school fat kid move of holding my nose and dunking my head underwater, I&#8217;ll admit that I noticed some loss in sound quality, but that&#8217;s to be expected I&#8217;d think, considering that you&#8217;re underwater and all.</p>
<p>The XtreaMP3 is very well made, and it&#8217;s buttons and overall &#8220;feel&#8221; are anything but cheap. One can easily and quickly go to the next and previous tracks, and change volume, without fumbling all over the place, and losing your stride and or breaststroke.</p>
<p>That said though, the one major drawback I found with the XtreaMP3 was this. See, unlike an iPod Nano (or really, just about any high end MP3 player at this point)  there&#8217;s no digital display for you to scroll through, which can be highly annoying at times. Still though, the lack of a display screen does make the XstreaMP3 more streamlined, and it&#8217;s probably what makes it just so waterproof in the first place.</p>
<p>All in all, even though I am an admitted Apple dork, I&#8217;m a fan of the XtreaMP3, and would highly recommend it to any avid outdoorsy type who just needs their tunes while they&#8217;re swimming, snorkeling, white water rafting or running in the pouring rain. It&#8217;s rugged, built to take a beating, and sounds pretty damn good.</p>
<p><em>Retail price of the Finis XtreaMP3 is $149.95.</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finis-xtreamp3-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/XstreaMp3-Review.R.mp3" length="885848" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philips DC290 iPod/iPhone dock review</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/philips-dc290-ipodiphone-dock/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/philips-dc290-ipodiphone-dock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alarm clock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=44979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decent, well-priced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-113-300x219.png" alt="" title="Picture-113-300x219" width="300" height="219" class="alignright size-full wp-image-44980" />When the Philips DC290 debuted at CES this year, there was some fanfare about the design on top of a promising feature set.</p>
<p>But the genre of iPod/iPhone docking alarm clocks is a saturated one. Today <a href="/tag/ihome">iHome</a> alarm clocks are in every 3-star hotel. Surplus units are for sale for pennies on the dollar at T.J.Maxx stores. </p>
<p>Maybe bloated is the better word. Most of the iPod docks today are cheap, plastic junk.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why the Philips DC290 passes muster. It&#8217;s a relatively inexpensive dock being put out by a legitimate electronics company. It has a brushed aluminum finish and a remote control that works from more than a few feet away.</p>
<p>Testing out the DC290, there are a few quick flaws. The iPod/iPhone dock is set pretty deep, so it&#8217;s difficult to work within the touchscreen if you don&#8217;t feel like controlling the device with the dock. The bass is also way too high, so don&#8217;t even think about turning on the fake &#8220;Dynamic Bass Boost&#8221; feature. Audio tends to distort at the higher volume levels, and the thumping bass doesn&#8217;t help that much.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the device is solid. It has dual alarms and a gentle wake-up cycle that gradually raises the volume until you&#8217;re up and at &#8216;em. </p>
<p>You can also plug in any other audio device with a headphone-style input port. </p>
<p>The FM tuner isn&#8217;t very useful. The antenna is a thin piece of wire, and you can&#8217;t replace it with anything better. There also isn&#8217;t an AM tuner. I know we&#8217;re talking about an iPod device, but AM news radio is still big for waking up in major cities like New York and Boston. </p>
<p>The best part about the DC290 is the price. At just $99 &#8212; and surely to be on sale &#8212; you get a basic, good-sounding dock. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/philips-dc290-ipodiphone-dock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession over? Time for that second HDTV</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/recession-over-time-for-that-second-hdtv/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/recession-over-time-for-that-second-hdtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuvision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sceptre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=43766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at the smaller models for your office or bedroom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>During a recession, a second television may not be a priority. As the economy recovers, though, buyers might find a little extra money to splurge on such a purchase.</p>
<p>We tested four smaller high-definition televisions under 40 inches in different price brackets for secondary use in guestrooms, offices, bedrooms or even kitchens. We viewed some of our favorite shows on the value-conscious Sceptre 19&quot; LED HDTV at $199; the larger screen and more robust feature set of the Vizio M220VA 22&quot; LED HDTV for $300; the balanced Sharp Aquos LC-32D47UT at $549; and the simply indulgent NuVision Lucidium NVU32FX5, a 32&quot; LCD HDTV, for $1249.</p>
<p>Robert Stanton, of Smarthome and Theater Systems, based in Milford, Conn., recommended the Vizio or the Sharp.</p>
<p>&quot;If you asked me a year ago, my take on Vizio was â€˜so-so&#8217; at best, but they&#8217;ve made some really big changes to their product line, and their products are really getting a lot better,&quot; Stanton said.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=hdtv%2032%22&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>The Vizio is a good bet. This is a fantastically inexpensive TV that gives you tons of features like dual HDMI inputs, which are digital video plugs for the maximum high definition picture quality, and it also comes with an optical digital audio port, to work with a multi-speaker surround sound system. The picture is also bright, clear, and easy on the eyes and the TV set is razor thin.</p>
<p>But if you want something a bit bigger,  the Sharp AQUOS produces a wonderful picture on a 32-inch screen. The picture is crisp, the colors are natural, and though it&#8217;s not as thin as the new, LED televisions, it still has a low profile. The only part we didn&#8217;t like as much was the onboard speakers.</p>
<p>Stanton also recommended the Sharp television, speaking highly of its picture quality.</p>
<p>Like the The LED Vizio, the Sceptre television is super thin, so it hangs on a wall and looks like a picture frame, or sits on a desk without taking up much room. Overall, the Sceptre gets an &quot;A&quot; for effort, but it&#8217;s not nearly as good of a television as the others. You&#8217;re saving money here, but giving up some picture quality.</p>
<p>NuVision is a luxury maker. It has high 10-bit color processing and advanced hardware on board to give an optimum picture and sound experience &#8212; and it delivers. We&#8217;re just not sure all that money is needed for a bedroom television. You also get some style points with the NuVision. The television has a limited edition hot pink model available, and the company offers a program that will custom-tailor the casing of the television to match your home d©cor. Again, neat, but not fiscally practical.</p>
<p>&quot;NuVision builds an incredible product,&quot; Stanton said. &quot;But if you&#8217;re going to use it as â€˜light to go to sleep to,&#8217; I would go with the Vizio.&quot;</p>
<h3>Sceptre 19&quot; LED HDTV, <em>$199</em></h3>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/E195BV-HD-FV.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-43771" title="E195BV-HD FV" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/E195BV-HD-FV-300x244.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="185" /></a><strong>Pros:</strong> You get a thin LED television for under $200. It has a litany of ports, including dual HDMI, computer inputs, and digital audio.</p>
<p><strong>Cons: </strong>Port location is poor, and plugs are often hard to reach. Picture quality is meager at best.</p>
<p><strong>Final word: </strong>You can spend a few more bucks for a better television.</p>
<h3>Vizio M220VA 22&quot; LED HDTV, <em>$300</em></h3>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/VIZIO-M220VA_Razor_Angled.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-43772" title="VIZIO M220VA_Razor_Angled" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/VIZIO-M220VA_Razor_Angled-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="123" height="123" /></a><strong>Pros:</strong> The Vizio is razor-thin and displays an incredible high-def picture for just $300. It&#8217;s also stylish and comes in either black or white.</p>
<p><strong>Cons: </strong>None that we can see.</p>
<p><strong>Final word:</strong> This is not 2006&#8242;s Vizio. This is a quality television and a perfect way to get your feet wet with LED television technology.</p>
<h3>Sharp Aquos LC-32D47UT, <em>$549</em></h3>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/LC-32D47UT-3QL-hires.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-43773" title="LC-32D47UT-3QL-hires" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/LC-32D47UT-3QL-hires-300x273.jpg" alt="" width="173" height="157" /></a><strong>Pros:</strong> The Sharp AQUOS produces a wonderful picture, and we&#8217;ve seen it on sale for under $400, so the price is right.</p>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong> The onboard speakers are not great.</p>
<p><strong>Final word: </strong>If you see it for under $400, buy it. You&#8217;ll love this television.</p>
<h3>NuVision Lucidium NVU32FX5, a 32&quot; LCD HDTV, <em>$1249</em></h3>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/nuvisionBLACK32_37-HIGH-RES.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-43774" title="nuvisionBLACK32_37 HIGH RES" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/nuvisionBLACK32_37-HIGH-RES-300x164.jpg" alt="" width="218" height="119" /></a><strong>Pros: </strong>NuVision is a high-quality television maker that custom builds its hardware and screens to amazing results.</p>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong> Price is the worry. The Pink model is $150 more for the same product.</p>
<p><strong>Final word:</strong> This is a fantastic television if you can afford it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/recession-over-time-for-that-second-hdtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bang &amp; Olufsen BeoLab 4 PC</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/bang-olufsen-beolab-4-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/bang-olufsen-beolab-4-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bang & olufsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beolab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=10078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They're amazing, but how much amazingness do you need?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">4 out of 5 stars<br />
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&bc1=000000&IS2=1&bg1=FFFFFF&fc1=000000&lc1=0000FF&t=blasmaga-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&m=amazon&f=ifr&asins=B000RF429S" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>
<p>The BeoLab 4 PC is probably the best-sounding thing I&#8217;ve ever plugged into a computer.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s talk about that for a second.</p>
<p>At $1,000, these speakers cost more than the vast majority of desktop PCs on the market today. </p>
<p>Honestly, the speakers sound fantastic. You probably can&#8217;t buy something off the shelf that&#8217;s going to sound as good as the BeoLab 4.</p>
<p>Each speaker is powered and amplified (and as such, each speaker requires its own electrical outlet) and these pyramid-shaped speakers really crank. There are some small speakers that claim to reproduce full loudspeaker sound, and there are few that do. These do.</p>
<p>One issue I have with these speakers is that the BeoLab 4 is just a speaker. It&#8217;s designed to be plugged into stereos and amps and all kinds of cool products, but not necessarily computers. The BeoLab 4 PC is the same thing, but it&#8217;s designed with the right connectors to plug it into a computer sound card&#8217;s headphone jack. That does the job for the most part, but there&#8217;s no on and off switch, and there&#8217;s no volume control, so you&#8217;re relying totally on the computer&#8217;s volume control. </p>
<p>Each speaker is built on a 4-inch driver with a 3/4-inch fabric dome tweeter with 35 watts provided by the amp. Requiring two power outlets is a pain, but it&#8217;s mostly just an inconvenience because they only consume 7 watts of power. Don&#8217;t worry about the electrical bill. Frequency range is 50-20,000Hz.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=bang%20olufsen&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of technical things I can say about these speakers, or you can read them <a href="/files/BeoLab4_en_technical_specifications.pdf">here</a>. The bottom line is, do you need these speakers?</p>
<p>Do you own a stock Dell? Yes? Then no, you don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Are you an iTunes whore who&#8217;s always listening to your downloaded music? Yes? Then no, you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Watch the occasional DVD on your computer? Nah, still don&#8217;t need these.</p>
<p>Are you a music producer using expensive software and high end hardware? Yes? Oh. Well then yeah, these would be good.</p>
<p>Do you edit high definition video with multi-channel audio tracks? Yeah, these would do nicely.</p>
<p>Are you getting the picture? </p>
<p>These are awesome monitors. They sound great. They look good. They&#8217;re powered. You can even customize the colors.</p>
<p>The fact is, unless you need high-end speakers (and are equipped for them) you&#8217;re not going to notice the difference between these for $1,000 and a $100 set from Best Buy.</p>
<p>The BeoLab 4 is much more practical as a home theater speaker than it is as a desktop computer solution. They&#8217;re expensive toys for people who have a G-note to spare in this economy.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/bang-olufsen-beolab-4-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a Snoop antenna any good?</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/is-a-snoop-antenna-any-good/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/is-a-snoop-antenna-any-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 05:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=13787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The police scanner is still one of the most versatile tools in the journalist&#8217;s arsenal, sometimes right up there with the No. 8030 Gregg Ruled spiral reporter&#8217;s notebook and a pencil (pens are unreliable when it&#8217;s -10 degrees or if its raining). Spot news photographers are famous for their scanners. I once rode along with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>The police scanner is still one of the most versatile tools in the journalist&#8217;s arsenal, sometimes right up there with the No. 8030 Gregg Ruled spiral reporter&#8217;s notebook and a pencil (pens are unreliable when it&#8217;s -10 degrees or if its raining).</p>
<p>Spot news photographers are famous for their scanners. I once rode along with a photog who had five scanners going in his car at once. Personally, whether I&#8217;m on the road or in the office, the scanner is usually clacking and beeping away with potential news from around Boston or the surrounding towns. </p>
<p>The antennas that come with scanners aren&#8217;t exactly professional grade, but they get the job done &#8230; mostly. </p>
<p>But there exists a <a href="http://www.scannewengland.net/">whole</a>, <a href="http://www.scannermaster.com/">eager</a>, <a href="http://www.radioreference.com/">dedicated</a> group of hobbyists in the field of scanning. Some of them build their own antennas, and others buy any of a variety of commercially available ones.</p>
<p>Lately, there&#8217;s been buzz about a so-called &#8220;Snoop&#8221; antenna, which is essentially wire inside a PVC pipe. It&#8217;s <a href="http://stores.ebay.com/slinkyantennas">popular on eBay</a> and some other online retailers especially.</p>
<p>So I bought one.</p>
<p>Here is some technical jargon:</p>
<p>The antenna claims to be tuned to 30 &#8211; 1200 MHz, but the lower bands, 30-200 MHz come in very poorly compared to the higher end of the spectrum, 450-900 MHz. </p>
<p>The majority of police and fire departments around Boston use 450-490ish MHz, but many still operate on the lower band, 150-162 MHz, and some towns even operate on the 25-50 MHz band. </p>
<p>Technical jargon over.</p>
<p>The Snoop antenna picks up the 400 MHz frequencies very well in my tests, pulling transmissions from Brighton to as far north as Andover, as far west as Framingham, and all the way south to Plymouth. Plymouth and Andover are well more than 20 miles away, but Framingham is much closer, and I believe the reason I&#8217;m not picking up many more is because more departments in MetroWest use the lower frequencies that the Snoop isn&#8217;t picking up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an expert, and I don&#8217;t have sophisticated, expensive equipment to compare it to, but if you want one guy&#8217;s advice: The Snoop picks up frequencies from farther away and works well on higher frequencies. Overall, it does work better than a stock antenna, but don&#8217;t expect miracles.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/is-a-snoop-antenna-any-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding the best parking space for your iPod</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docking Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci/Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alarm clock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec lansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston acoustics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cambridge soundworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ihome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pure-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=12435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you need a bit more power than those shiny white earbuds that come with your iPod can offer. That&#8217;s where an entire audio sub-industry has sprung up, catering entirely to iPod owners who want to &#8220;dock&#8221; their music box somewhere and jam to a room-filling sound that&#8217;s not mashed into their ears. Blast and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Sometimes you need a bit more power than those shiny white earbuds that come with your iPod can offer.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where an entire audio sub-industry has sprung up, catering entirely to iPod owners who want to &#8220;dock&#8221; their music box somewhere and jam to a room-filling sound that&#8217;s not mashed into their ears.</p>
<p>Blast and <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2009/04/19/spreading_your_ipods_music/" target="_blank">The Boston Globe</a> recently tested five of these docks: the Altec Lansing inMotion Max at $199, the Logitech Pure-Fi Express Plus for $78, the compact iHome iH4B for $39.99, the Cambridge SoundWorks i765 for $299, and Wayland-based Sprout Creation&#8217;s all-wood Vers 2X at $199.</p>
<p>As a bonus, Blast also tested the Boston Acoustics Duo-I at $199 and the iHome iH51BR at $149.</p>
<p>For professional advice, we turned to Dariusz Dobrolinski, is co-owner of the tiny yet historic <a href="http://www.qaudio.com/">Q Audio</a> store on Vassar Street in Cambridge, which claims to be the worlds smallest hi-fi store and one of the original distributors of CD players in the US in the early 80s. Dobrolinski said the Altec Lansing inMotion Max was the best item on the list, and we agreed.</p>
<p>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/imt702_low_3qtr_iphone/' title='The Altec Lansing inMotion Max was the best overall item on the list.' rel='gallery-12435'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/imt702_low_3qtr_iphone-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="The Altec Lansing inMotion Max was the best overall item on the list." title="The Altec Lansing inMotion Max was the best overall item on the list." /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/duo-i_spanish_moss/' title='The Boston Acoustics model was a great choice with superb sound.' rel='gallery-12435'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/duo-i_spanish_moss-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="The Boston Acoustics model was a great choice with superb sound." title="The Boston Acoustics model was a great choice with superb sound." /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/sw765i_w-ipod_touch_hr/' title='The Cambridge model was nerd-gasmy.' rel='gallery-12435'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/sw765i_w-ipod_touch_hr-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="The Cambridge model was nerd-gasmy." title="The Cambridge model was nerd-gasmy." /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/10248_27_5/' title='The iH51 was neat, but impractical ' rel='gallery-12435'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/10248_27_5-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="The iH51 was neat, but impractical" title="The iH51 was neat, but impractical" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/a2-lh/' title='I really doted over the all-wood Vers product' rel='gallery-12435'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/a2-lh-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="I really doted over the all-wood Vers product" title="I really doted over the all-wood Vers product" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/purefiexplus_angled_iphone/' title='The PureFi Express Plus is compact, but makes up for its small size with a big sound' rel='gallery-12435'><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/purefiexplus_angled_iphone.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="The PureFi Express Plus is compact, but makes up for its small size with a big sound" title="The PureFi Express Plus is compact, but makes up for its small size with a big sound" /></a>
<a href='http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/attachment/ih4b-nano_hr/' title='This is an oldie but a goodie if you&#039;re looking for something inexpensive' rel='gallery-12435'><img width="70" height="70" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ih4b-nano_hr-70x70.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="This is an oldie but a goodie if you&#039;re looking for something inexpensive" title="This is an oldie but a goodie if you&#039;re looking for something inexpensive" /></a>
</p>
<p>&#8220;It sounded the richest,&#8221; Dobrolinski said. He warned us not to jump at the deepest bass or the highest treble, which some inexpensive systems tend to crank up to make up for their lower quality components.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you want to buy a docking system, don&#8217;t look for something that has bass and sizzles, it may impress you, but later on you will notice you don&#8217;t get the midrange and that&#8217;s where all the instruments and all the voices are,&#8221; Dobrolinski said. &#8220;Bass is not critical unless you want to fill a huge room, but none of those systems are designed for huge rooms.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Altec Lansing and Cambridge SoundWorks models were all very similar, though. They sounded great, look great, and come from brand names that are known for generally building their products to high quality specifications.</p>
<p>The iHome name has gained a lot of ground in the last three years. You often see these functional alarm clock iPod docks in both luxury hotels and college dorms. They generally sound good and have useful wakeup features like dual alarm clock times and, of course, the ability to wake up to your favorite songs blasting from your nightstand. The iH4b&#8217;s compact size and low price makes it a great value for dorm rooms and bedrooms. It has a good sound on a small footprint.</p>
<p>The Vers 2X is a great choice people who want something different. It doesn&#8217;t have a radio or really any other features except an iPod dock, but it&#8217;s an attractive, well-built speaker system.</p>
<p>Dobrolinski said that you should also focus on how the product looks. Style is important. He also said that you&#8217;ll want your dock to have a remote control so you&#8217;re not getting up all the time to tune it.</p>
<p><strong><em>Individual products on Page 2</em></strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tech-reviews/av/finding-the-best-parking-space-for-your-ipod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech Pure-Fi Express Plus</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-pure-fi-express-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-pure-fi-express-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docking Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pure-fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=10149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Logitech&#8217;s portable Pure-Fi Express Plus provides a solid and functional solution for playing your music and podcasts. It is portable and can run off batteries or AC power, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you should drag it to the beach. The cloth grille and rotating knob don&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;d stack up too well against millions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img style="float:right;margin-left:5px;" src="http://blastmagazine.com/images/ratings/85.jpg" alt="85" />Logitech&#8217;s portable Pure-Fi Express Plus provides a solid and functional solution for playing your music and podcasts.</p>
<p>It is portable and can run off batteries or AC power, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you should drag it to the beach. The cloth grille and rotating knob don&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;d stack up too well against millions of miniature sand particles infiltrating their pores. (<a href="/the-magazine/technology/2008/02/altec-lansing-im9/">check this out for something different</a>)</p>
<p>But for indoor or clean-outdoor use, you do get a compact sound machine with clear audio, decent if not great highs and the same thumping bass we&#8217;ve come to expect from every small form factor audio product on the market from a decent manufacturer.</p>
<p>The fact is, Logitech is turning into a strong player in the personal audio realm, putting out a variety of solutions. The Express Plus is remarkably similar in size, shape and sound as the <a href="/the-magazine/technology/2008/12/logitech-squeezebox-boom/">Squeezebox Boom</a>, which I just loved and has caused me to bookmark <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/radio1">BBC Radio 1</a>.</p>
<p>Older (by now, ancient) iPod models don&#8217;t fit as well in Pure-Fi Express Plus. At first, the remote control had no effect on my third generation iPod &#8212; it didn&#8217;t change the songs or play or pause, but I learned that was because the iPod wasn&#8217;t fully plugged in. Once I pushed down a bit, the remote worked, but that&#8217;s still a problem. The device doesn&#8217;t hold larger iPods in place very well. The Nano had no such problem, though.</p>
<p>The remote is a neat feature, though it doesn&#8217;t add a ton of value to the product. I tend to lose the mini-motes anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seeing these products for about $50 now. It&#8217;s worth it. You need something to dock your iPod, unless you just you to play your songs off iTunes. God help you.</p>
<p><em>This is one of a series of iPod-docking devices Blast is reviewing in April</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-pure-fi-express-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paradigm Studio Esprit 5.1</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/paradigm-studio-esprit-51/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/paradigm-studio-esprit-51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esprit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradigm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surround sound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=4027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you can just allow yourself to sit back and enjoy the music. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px;" title="9" src="http://blastmagazine.com/images/ratings/90.jpg" alt="9" />Sometimes you can just allow yourself to sit back and enjoy the music.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Blast got to do for the last few months as we tested out the Paradigm Studio Esprit reference speakers.</p>
<p>The front of the system is essentially the three same speakers: the Esprit L/R and C for center. We paired the front speakers the Paradigm&#8217;s Studio ADP-590 surrounds bringing up the rear.</p>
<p>We also tested their Seismic 10 subwoofer.</p>
<p>Total price: $6,652.</p>
<p>The speakers have incredible range and sound great in all applications &#8212; including CD music, television, video games and DTS audio.</p>
<p>Installation is a worry. Unless you want to dish out $500 more for the left/right stands, you have to mount the speakers to the wall, which ends up being quite a construction feat.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/speaker__1230560583_2558.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6932" title="speaker__1230560583_2558" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/speaker__1230560583_2558.jpg" alt="speaker__1230560583_2558" width="529" height="350" /></a></p>
<p>Robert Stanton, co-owner of Connecticut&#8217;s Smarthome &amp; Theater Systems and its &#8220;head geek&#8221; who&#8217;s helped me out on several Boston Globe <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/12/28/have_a_blast_in_your_living_room/">stories</a>, said the system was impressive too.</p>
<p>The most important thing about an audio setup, Stanton said, is that all the speakers are the same brand.</p>
<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s very important,&#8221; he said. &#8220;When sound travels across the surround field, you want whatever is whipping by you to sound the same through every speaker.&#8221;</p>
<p>We were both most impressed by the Paradigm set.</p>
<p><strong>Pros:</strong> It&#8217;s the best-sounding system on the list. The front, center, and rear speakers combine to create a realistic surround sound experience, and the subwoofer not only shakes a room but adds deep definition to the package.</p>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong> Price is a worry. If you don&#8217;t want to drill a half dozen holes in your wall, the stands for the front speaker cost $500 more.</p>
<p><strong>Overall:</strong> The Esprit sounds amazing and gets the job done, no matter what you&#8217;re using it for.</p>
<p>Specs on page 2.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/paradigm-studio-esprit-51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod Nano 4G reviewed</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/ipod-nano-4g-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/ipod-nano-4g-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=6576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is yet another improvement in a long line of iPods. It's always good to have a greater capacity and a bigger screen, but the Genius is definitely a blessing to music lovers. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img style="float:right;margin-left:5px;" src="/images/ratings/90.jpg" alt="9 Excellent" />The fourth generation iPod Nanos are hot.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re being called &#8220;nano-chromatic,&#8221; and they come in nine different colors, including silver, black, purple, blue, green, yellow, orange, red and pink. When you buy the red Nano, a portion of your money will go to the (Product)Red campaign, which works to fight AIDS.</p>
<p>Flashy colors aside, the new Nano has made some nice design changes. Though it is the same size as the second generation, it has more appealing lines. It narrows toward the sides, giving it a more elegant shape than the blunt third generation. More importantly, the new screen is two inches diagonally, compared to old one and a half inch screen.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_6577" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 569px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/showcase_lead_nano20080909.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-6577" title="showcase_lead_nano20080909" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/showcase_lead_nano20080909.jpg" alt="They are flashy -- no doubt." width="559" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">They are flashy -- no doubt.</p></div></p>
<p>With this new screen, it is finally reasonable to watch a movie on the Nano. When you play a video, it automatically turns to fit the wide screen. Technically speaking, the screen is a liquid crystal display with blue-white LED backlight and 320-by-240-px. resolution at 204px. per inch. Plainly speaking, the picture is really pretty.</p>
<p>Another significant improvement the fourth generation has over its predecessors is its storage capacity. Apple has doubled the capacity to 8GB or 16GB. This means 2,000 or 4,000 songs, eight hours or 16 hours of video, and 7,000 to 14,000 iPod-viewable photos. With all of this entertainment to store, battery life is always important. Fully charged, the new Nano can play 24 hours of music or four hours of video.</p>
<p>The new Nano functions mostly like any other iPod. You can use the touch wheel to scroll through your music, movies, pictures and such. They&#8217;re organized the same way too, but now you can tilt it sideways to view a cover flow like the one on iTunes.</p>
<p>Apple went to great lengths to eliminate all the scrolling and backtracking it takes to move through menus. There is a search feature, just in case you&#8217;re simply at a loss to find something manually. You can also hold down the center button while listening to a song to browse the album or other songs by the artist. As usual, you can also do this to add the song to the On-The-Go playlist. The most quirky new shortcut lets you shuffle songs without moving all the way back to the main menu. Instead, you just shake the iPod. At first, this feature is fun &#8212; one flick and you can go into shuffle mode. You quickly realize that it is an awfully violent shake though. This is probably to prevent you from inadvertently shuffling you music, but superficially, it makes you look a little crazy.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=ipod%20nano%204g&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>This sensitivity to motion adds a new element to playing games on the Nano. For instance, you can play an electronic version of the old maze game &#8212; tilting the &#8220;box&#8221; around to navigate the ball around a hole-filled maze. Much like using the shuffle feature though, you might look a little odd playing on the train.</p>
<p>The coolest feature of the new Nano is called Genius &#8212; also a feature on the latest versions of iTunes. Genius creates playlists based on a single song. It chooses at least 10 similar songs and if you like what it&#8217;s created, you can save it. The manual, iTunes and the iPod itself explain this, but if you overlooked the manual, you might not realize that the Genius feature needs to be set up on your iTunes, then synced to you iPod for it to work.</p>
<p>Overall, the fourth generation iPod Nano is a lot of fun. It is yet another improvement in a long line of iPods. It&#8217;s always good to have a greater capacity and a bigger screen, but the Genius is definitely a blessing to music lovers. Not to mention it looks pretty hot too.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/ipod-nano-4g-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mod squad: Orb Audio</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/mod-squad-orb-audio/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/mod-squad-orb-audio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orb audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=6528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can finally declare things interesting in the Blast Audio Issue by looking at the Orb Audio Mod series product line.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/82.jpg" alt="82" title="82" width="72" height="90" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;" />We can finally declare things interesting in the Blast Audio Issue by looking at the Orb Audio Mod series product line.</p>
<p>Blast got to, well, blast, some tiny little Orb Mod2 and Mod4 setups, done by combining two or four of these baseball-sized speakers and pairing them with their Super 8 subwoofer.</p>
<p>We were quite satisfied with the setup of two speakers each for front left, front right and center and a single Orb for the rear left and right.</p>
<p>The system is completely modular, which is both a pro and a con. The good thing is that you can tear the system apart, pulling speakers to where you want them like a delicious 4-speaker center channel option. The bad thing is that it&#8217;s an utter pain in the ass to assemble the setup, and even harder to MacGyver the wiring, as you have to series-wire each speaker into the next.</p>
<p>There would have been a simple solution to this. The speakers use a simple, small binding post for plugging in speaker wire. Orb should have added a banana plug port at the top of the binding post or made the binding post longer with two holes so that you can completely fit the wires in the speaker. Wires popping out during use remained a concern for us, though it didn&#8217;t happen in our tests.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/mod4.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6529" title="Orb Audio Mod4 example" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/mod4.jpg" alt="Orb Audio Mod4 example" width="600" height="278" /></a></p>
<p>When you&#8217;re done pulling your hair out, the system sounds great. You really need to have the subwoofer for the whole experience, however. There is good bass definition with just the satellites, but there&#8217;s a clear improvement with the Super 8.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the Mod speaker has rare earth magnets paired with Santoprene, Nomex and CCAD voice coils that enable a good audio response.</p>
<p>The speakers also look great. They come in black gloss, pearl white gloss, polished steel, copper, and antique bronze. The subwoofer doesn&#8217;t match, however. It only comes in matte black with a gray grille.</p>
<p>You do get a big sound with these little speakers, and that&#8217;s always a positive. We&#8217;re seeing a ton of little speakers making a splash in home audio, but don&#8217;t confuse these with cheap bargain store specials. The setup we tested starts at about $1,000.</p>
<p>The speakers are only rated for about 110 watts, which is confusing and disappointing for such an expensive system.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really curious, you can get a starter package of two Mod speakers for $239, that are ready to plug into your home theater.</p>
<p>Technical specs on page 2.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/mod-squad-orb-audio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marantz SA8003</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/marantz-sa8003/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/marantz-sa8003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marantz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=6451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The music coming out of your iPod doesn't sound as good as it would coming from a CD. Period. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">4 out of 5 stars</div>
<p>The music coming out of your iPod doesn&#8217;t sound as good as it would coming from a CD. Period.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean you have to spend $1,000 to squeeze the best possible audio out of your songs, does it?</p>
<p>Hence, we learn the plight of the audiophile. How good can music sound? How high can the quality get? How much should you spend?</p>
<p>The Marantz SA8003 was a treat. It puts out clear, rich bass notes, great midrange sound, and surprisingly clean treble with just a hint of imperfection at the highest tones. But we asked the company why anyone should pay $1,000 or more (the SA8003 is one of their midprice models) for a CD player.</p>
<p>After all, it&#8217;s a laser hitting a disc. What makes their lasers any better than Sony&#8217;s or even <a href="/the-magazine/technology/2007/11/coby-electronics-recalls-portable-units/">Coby</a> for the matter.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the complete, unedited response from Kevin Zarow, vice president of marketing for Marantz &#8212; you decide:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is a noticeable difference between a $200 CD player and an &#8220;audiophile quality&#8221; $1,000 Super Audio CD (SACD) player like the Marantz SA8003 &#8220;&quot; and it&#8217;s something that even casual listeners will be able to hear immediately. The much higher fidelity SACD player actually enables you to hear subtle things in your favorite music that you&#8217;ve probably never heard before, like more realistic vocals, deeper, richer bass notes, as well as a wider, more three dimensional sound stage. Beyond that, the build quality between players is significant. A player such as the Marantz will weigh a lot more, due to a more robust chassis, designed to reduce vibration which by the way, improves sound. The power supplies, DACs and CD drive mechanism will all be much higher grade and great attention will be paid to the signal path to insure that you hear the music in its purest form and not the electronics.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The SA8003 also has a USB port if you really get lonely for MP3s and music files. The optical output also</p>
<p><strong>Pros:</strong> The SA8003 is an audiophile-quality CD player with crisp, clear sound, and rich bass. It also has a USB port for playing MP3s.</p>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong> You really have to want it to spend $1,000 on a CD player, since your DVD player, video game console, and computer can all play CDs.</p>
<p><strong>The final word:</strong> Speaking strictly from a quality perspective, the SA8003 is great. Remember though, this is just a CD player and it&#8217;s only going to sound as good as the speakers and amplifier you already have.<br />
<a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sa800311.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6452" title="sa800311" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sa800311-300x102.jpg" alt="sa800311" width="300" height="102" /></a></p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t miss John Guilfoil&#8217;s &#8220;Five ways to listen to music without an iPod&#8221; </em><a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/11/23/listen_theres_lots_of_alternatives_to_mp3s/?page=full"><span style="color: #0e3b6f;"><em>story</em></span></a><em>, in The Boston Globe.</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/marantz-sa8003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech Squeezebox Boom</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-squeezebox-boom/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-squeezebox-boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[squeezebox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[squeezebox book]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=6390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the funnest things about the Logitech Squeezebox Boom is listening to Radio One London from an apartment in Boston.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">4.5 out of 5 stars</div>
<p><img style="float:left;margin-right:5px;" src="/images/editorschoice2.jpg" alt="Editor's Choice" />The Logitech Squeezebox really <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/11/23/listen_theres_lots_of_alternatives_to_mp3s/?page=full" target="_blank">tickled our fancy</a>. This product will forever change the way we listen to music. We like it, in part, because the Internet provides tons of free choices from radio stations all over the world.</p>
<p>It would be fair to go into the ring not expecting much of a fight out of the plucky $300 Logitech &#8212; it&#8217;s based on fairly lossy streaming Internet audio after all and built on good if not basically mediocre drivers. But no. It sounds good. Not audiophile, but you&#8217;re not paying for audiophile either, are you?</p>
<p>One of the funnest things about the Logitech Squeezebox Boom is listening to Radio One London from an apartment in Boston.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Blast loves the Squeezebox: expanded horizons.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_6391" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/10321541_h17104607.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/10321541_h17104607-300x170.jpg" alt="One of the funnest things about the Logitech Squeezebox Boom is listening to Radio One London from an apartment in Boston." title="10321541_h17104607" width="300" height="170" class="size-medium wp-image-6391" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">One of the funnest things about the Logitech Squeezebox Boom is listening to Radio One London from an apartment in Boston.</p></div>There are some free Internet radio stations and plenty of premium pay services, but you can also download Logitech&#8217;s software to any computer and access your entire collection of music &#8212; including lossless FLAC audio for better sounding songs.</p>
<p>Tuning via a knob is much easier than tediously and repeatedly pressing buttons over and over, so that&#8217;s a big plus as well.</p>
<p><a href="/docs/Logitech_Squeezebox_Boom_Audio_Design.pdf">Download an audio design white paper on the Squeezebox Boom</a>.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=logitech%20squeezebox&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Pros: </strong>Internet radio provides a number of free choices from radio stations all over the world, giving you not only a wide range of music, but a little culture. A ton of the content is free, and you can also stream your existing music collection from your computer to the Squeezebox. It plugs into your network or downloads via Wi-Fi.</p>
<p><strong>Cons: </strong>You have to download special software to send your MP3s and music files to the device. It doesn&#8217;t automatically find them on your network.</p>
<p><strong>The final word: </strong>This is really more of a lifestyle choice than an impulse buy, meaning it will change your music listening life. We loved it.</p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t miss John Guilfoil&#8217;s &#8220;Five ways to listen to music without an iPod&#8221; <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/11/23/listen_theres_lots_of_alternatives_to_mp3s/?page=full">story</a>, in The Boston Globe.</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-squeezebox-boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meridian F80</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/meridian-f80/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/meridian-f80/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cd player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meridian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=6340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's bloody costly, but if you absolutely have to have the best stereo/radio/alarm clock, drop your chips here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">4 out of 5 stars</div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.thef80.com" target="_blank">Meridian F80</a> was pitched to us as a solution for a flashy executive as a great &#8220;secondary audio system&#8221; for bedrooms, kitchens, etc.</p>
<p>Of course, this British audio product partially designed by Ferrari costs $3,000.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_6343" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 299px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/f80-connect.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6343" title="f80-connect" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/f80-connect-289x300.jpg" alt="The Boothroyd Stuart Meridian F80" width="289" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Boothroyd Stuart Meridian F80</p></div>Which means, if you&#8217;re a woman between 23-30 years old and are in the market to buy this as your secondary audio solution, please call me. I&#8217;m an eligible bachelor with great prospects.</p>
<p>It may not be cheap, but what the F80 is is a full on 2.1 (two speakers and a subwoofer) stereo system with two programmable antennae, input/output options and an excellent CD player built in/</p>
<p>You can also buy an iPod dock for the F80, but if you buy a $3,000 stereo, don&#8217;t sully it with your compressed musical crap, ok?</p>
<p>The rear mounted subwoofer adds amazing depth to the system, but the real surprise is that the two front speakers don&#8217;t sound like they&#8217;re inches apart. You get a spacial experience that feels like a room full of sound in a compact little red box.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=bn1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;browse=1065836&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Pros:</strong> The F80 sounds amazing. It is a complete 2.1 (two speakers and a subwoofer) setup inside one compact box. It plays CDs, AM/FM radio, and you can even plug it into your television/home theater to play DVDs. If you really miss your iPod, you can buy an external dock to plug it in.</p>
<p><strong>Cons:</strong> Why doesn&#8217;t it have HD radio? We understand that not everyone is all about HD radio, but why not throw it in for three grand?</p>
<p><strong>The final word:</strong> The F80 is basically a portable home theater with 80 watts of power. It doesn&#8217;t feel like the speakers are right next to each other. If you absolutely have to have the best stereo/radio/alarm clock, drop your chips here.</p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t miss John Guilfoil&#8217;s &#8220;Five ways to listen to music without an iPod&#8221; <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/11/23/listen_theres_lots_of_alternatives_to_mp3s/?page=full">story</a>, in The Boston Globe.</em></p>
<p><em>Promotional:</em><br />
Get the <a href="http://www.thespeakercompany.com/Home-Theater-C7.aspx">best home theater speakers</a> for optimum home theater experience at The Speaker Company.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/meridian-f80/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cambridge SoundWorks SW820 HD Radio</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/cambridge-soundworks-sw820-hd-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/cambridge-soundworks-sw820-hd-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cambridge soundworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharper image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=6281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like it or not, HD Radio sounds good, and for the $100 you'll spend on Amazon for this baby, Cambridge SoundWorks makes their case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">4 out of 5 stars</div>
<p>A few years ago, you were looking at $400+ for any decent Cambridge SoundWorks product at their mall-front audio boutiques.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sw820blackhopsd.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sw820blackhopsd.jpg" alt="" title="sw820blackhopsd" width="500" height="306" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6283" /></a></p>
<p>You got a good product, but they sort of fell into the Sharper Image category of &#8220;oh, this is nice, but I&#8217;d never spend that much money on it.&#8221; </p>
<p>The big difference, however, is that Cambridge actually has useful products that normal people can benefit from instead of hundreds of different back massagers.</p>
<p>Cambridge SoundWorks, now owned by Creative Labs, decided to close all of its retail outlets and focus on direct marketing &#8212; reducing their and our costs.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=electronics&#038;search=cambridge%20soundworks%20radio&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>Thus, the SW820 HD Radio, which would run you hundreds more in the store days, is only $129.99, and it still sounds like $400.</p>
<p>Not everyone is a believer in HD Radio, and we&#8217;re not necessarily sold on the concept either. But look at it this way: Radio is here to stay. Why not give HD a shot if it really does offer more programming options for free?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just one flaw in that otherwise impeccable logic. The HD signals are often spotty at best, especially getting 15-20 miles into the suburbs, away from a metro radio signal.</p>
<p>Here in Boston, you&#8217;ll have a hard time getting a good HD signal &#8212; or the stations-between-the-stations &#8212; on the South or North Shore or beyond Framingham. (West Coasters &#8212; think of that as deep into Orange County from Downtown Los Angeles.)</p>
<p>The other big flaw with the SW820 is that the antenna is a bitch to screw on, requiring a special wrench that comes with the radio. Don&#8217;t lose it, or you can forget about HD programming no matter where you are.</p>
<p>The radio does sound very good, and tuning via the knob instead of repeatedly mashing buttons is a relief. When you do get an HD signal, you clearly notice the difference. </p>
<p>Like it or not, HD Radio sounds good, and for the $100 you&#8217;ll spend on Amazon for this baby, Cambridge SoundWorks makes their case.</p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t miss John Guilfoil&#8217;s &#8220;Five ways to listen to music without an iPod&#8221; <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/11/23/listen_theres_lots_of_alternatives_to_mp3s/?page=full">story</a>, in The Boston Globe.</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/cambridge-soundworks-sw820-hd-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Altec Lansing iM237 Orbit MP3</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im237-orbit-mp3/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im237-orbit-mp3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Audio Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec lansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rechargeable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=4039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you get something like the Altec Lansing Orbit Mp3 and a crisp, clean sound with great bass and highs (read the back of the box, they quoted me) it's easy to realize why name is still the first thing audiophiles look at when they buy a toy. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>We love the little <a href="/the-magazine/technology/2008/01/altec-lansing-im207-orbit/">Orbit</a>. It&#8217;s like a little baby who&#8217;s so cute and cuddly until you wake it up and it lets out a bellowing scream, the depth of which you didn&#8217;t feel possible from something so tiny. The iM237 is a new model with mainly design changes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an audio guy. I like the wires and plugs and cones and crossovers. I&#8217;m not a pro, but I know what I like.</p>
<p>When you get something like the Altec Lansing Orbit Mp3 and a crisp, clean sound with great bass and highs (read the back of the box, they quoted me) it&#8217;s easy to realize why name is still the first thing audiophiles look at when they buy a toy.</p>
<p>The best thing about this little speaker is that you can plug anything into it and share your tunes. Don&#8217;t underestimate it either; it&#8217;s loud!</p>
<p>You get a solid day out of 3 AAA batteries, so have the rechargeables ready to go.</p>
<p>5 out of 5 stars</p>
<p><img src="/images/editorschoice1.jpg" alt="Editor's Choice" /></p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/orbit_low_touch_396.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/orbit_low_touch_396-150x150.jpg" alt="orbit_low_touch_396" title="orbit_low_touch_396" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4043" /></a> <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/orbit_front_398.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/orbit_front_398-150x150.jpg" alt="orbit_front_398" title="orbit_front_398" width="150" height="150" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-4042" /></a> <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/im237-case_400.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/im237-case_400-150x150.jpg" alt="im237-case_400" title="im237-case_400" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-4041" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im237-orbit-mp3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech Z-5 USB Stereo Speakers</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-z-5-usb-stereo-speakers/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-z-5-usb-stereo-speakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These ones pass the test.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">4 out of 5 stars</div>
<p>USB speaker technology is almost as old as USB, itself.</p>
<p>They were the cool guy at the party. Suddenly you had digital sound without a big, expensive sound card.</p>
<p>Then it quieted down for a while. People calmed down their PC audio &#8212; PC gaming started faltering &#8212; and speakers on your computer were less important.</p>
<p>The Logitech Z-5&#8242;s are a new arrival to the genre, and they do it justice.</p>
<p>Plug them in, and they play. We liked the ease in installation, even in laptops, where the driver disables the onboard speakers, and then they turn back on after you unplug the Z-5&#8242;s.</p>
<p>We were most surprised by the sound, though we&#8217;re finding it easier to believe that <a href="/the-magazine/technology/2007/11/adiva-ti-speakers/" target="_self">good things</a> can come in‚  <a href="/the-magazine/technology/2008/01/altec-lansing-im207-orbit/">small packages</a> when it comes to speakers.</p>
<p>The speakers are omnidirectional and are great desk toys that you can hear all around the room. Maybe that doesn&#8217;t make it great for offices, but definitely in dorms and parties. They&#8217;re also durable, though admittedly they feel a little fragile with all that cloth grilling around it. It&#8217;s not the kind of thing you want to spill a beer on, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
<p>The remote control works, though I never use remotes for desktop speakers. Try and synch it to a <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/10/12/taking_control_of_your_gadgets/#" target="_blank">universal remote</a> maybe.</p>
<p>My ears are ringing after this month&#8217;s audio issue. These ones pass the test.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=15&#038;l=st1&#038;mode=pc-hardware&#038;search=logitech%20usb%20speakers&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" width="468" height="240" border="0" frameborder="0" style="border:none;" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/logitech-z-5-usb-stereo-speakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some OtterBoxes</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/some-otterboxes/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/some-otterboxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[otter box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[otterbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=5728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They add weight, width and bulk to your devices, but they are one of the best solutions out there for active gadget geeks. The few and the proud.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Let&#8217;s be clear, these OtterBoxes are not meant to be stealth. They aren&#8217;t designed to stay out of the way. They aren&#8217;t there to be convenient. They exist to protect your asset like a big hulkin&#8217; bodyguard pushing his way through the crowd.</p>
<p>They add weight, width and bulk to your devices, but they are one of the best solutions out there for active gadget geeks. The few and the proud.</p>
<p>Blast took a gander at three OtterBoxes: two &#8220;Armor&#8221; class boxes that waterproof iPod touch and Nano, and a &#8220;Defender&#8221; series case for the iPhone.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_5729" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 111px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/41r1rv8jol_sl500_aa280_.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-5729" title="41r1rv8jol_sl500_aa280_" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/41r1rv8jol_sl500_aa280_.jpg" alt="OtterBox Armor Case for 3G iPod nano (Clear)" width="101" height="101" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">OtterBox Armor Case for 3G iPod nano (Clear)</p></div></p>
<p><strong>OtterBox Armor Case for 3G iPod nano</strong><br />
$30 4 out of 5 stars</p>
<ul>
<li>Waterproof to 3 feet</li>
<li>Dust, dirt, drop and scratch protection</li>
<li>Click wheel still works</li>
<li>Adds a ton of girth to the product</li>
</ul>
<p><div id="attachment_5731" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 100px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2168krmf-2l_sl500_aa250_.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-5731" title="2168krmf-2l_sl500_aa250_" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2168krmf-2l_sl500_aa250_.jpg" alt="OtterBox Armor Series for iPod touch" width="90" height="90" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">OtterBox Armor Series for iPod touch</p></div></p>
<p><strong>OtterBox Armor Case for iPod touch</strong><br />
$40 4 out of 5 stars</p>
<ul>
<li>Completely changes look and feel of iPod</li>
<li>Waterproof to 3 feet</li>
<li>Dust, dirt, drop and scratch protection</li>
<li>Interface still works thanks to thin protective membrane</li>
<li>Makes the iPod look tough</li>
</ul>
<p><div id="attachment_5732" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 111px"><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/31qnbvbbrvl_sl500_aa280_.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-5732" title="31qnbvbbrvl_sl500_aa280_" src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/31qnbvbbrvl_sl500_aa280_.jpg" alt="OtterBox iPhone Defender" width="101" height="101" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">OtterBox iPhone Defender</p></div></p>
<p><strong>OtterBox Apple iPhone Defender Case</strong><br />
$65 3.5 out of 5 stars</p>
<ul>
<li>Bump, scratch and drop protection</li>
<li>Not waterproof</li>
<li>Less obtrusive than other boxes</li>
<li>Very expensive for a cell phone case.</li>
<li>Has a holster</li>
</ul>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/some-otterboxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hands on with the iHome iP47</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/hands-on-with-the-ihome-ip47/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/hands-on-with-the-ihome-ip47/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 04:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ihome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=4999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unknowingly, we broke the story of the iP47 back in March. It&#8217;s a taller, narrower iHome clock/radio/iPod dock. Only this time, it has Bluetooth on board. This allows you you to make wireless speakerphone calls from your iPhone, cell phone, PDA, etc., right from your alarm clock. It also lets you beam your music from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Unknowingly, we <a href="/the-magazine/technology/2008/03/ihomes-new-hotness/">broke</a> the story of the iP47 back in March.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=B001CVL1BS&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bc1=FFFFFF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;float:right;margin-left:5px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>It&#8217;s a taller, narrower iHome clock/radio/iPod dock. Only this time, it has Bluetooth on board. This allows you you to make wireless speakerphone calls from your iPhone, cell phone, PDA, etc., right from your alarm clock. It also lets you beam your music from any Bluetooth-compatible product (like your laptop) and play it up to 30 feet away on the iP47.</p>
<p>We finally got the chance to play with the iP47, and we&#8217;re impressed. The Bluetooth works as advertised, and phone and music playback sound great.</p>
<p>The calls were surprisingly clear over the unit, and you can even make calls using the remote control, leaving your iPhone or whatever plugged in and charging. A tray also pulls out of the unit with a full alphanumeric keypad. You can also plug in anything that&#8217;s not wireless via the line-in jack.</p>
<p>At $150, it&#8217;s an investment, but weigh the features and decide for yourself.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/hands-on-with-the-ihome-ip47/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Acid Music Studio 7</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/sony-acid-music-studio-7/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/sony-acid-music-studio-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fruity loops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony creative software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=3498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acid Pro first came out in 1998 and was the first true loop-based Desktop Audio Workstation. It's been popular with bands, DJ's and producers ever since.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div id="factbox">Desktop Audio<br />
Sony Creative Software<br />
4.5 out of 5 stars<br />
<a href="http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/products/product.asp?PID=383&amp;PageID=121" target="_blank"> Version comparison</a></div>
<p>There are two truly great and ridiculously fun pieces of software that have been out there forever in the music studio/audio editing/looping world: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0015D7BVM/104-3223552-2689566?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=blasmaga-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Fruity Loops</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000RO7H3W/104-3223552-2689566?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=blasmaga-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Acid</a>.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re fun because even though most people don&#8217;t have a damn clue how to really use the software, anyone can pick either title up and start making noise right away.</p>
<p>Acid Pro first came out in 1998 and was the first true loop-based Desktop Audio Workstation. It&#8217;s been popular with bands, DJ&#8217;s and producers ever since.</p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/musicstudio7_full.jpg"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/musicstudio7_full-300x191.jpg" alt="" title="musicstudio7_full" width="300" height="191" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3499" /></a></p>
<p>Acid Pro 6 remains the bulked up commercial product at $200+, but a slightly lighter Acid Music Studio 7, which you can scoop up for $50 has most of the features of its predecessor and just about everything a student or individual user could ask for.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=B000RO7H3W&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;m=amazon&#038;lc1=0E3B6F&#038;bc1=FFFFFF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;float:right;margin-left:5px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>What I liked about Acid Studio were the tutorials. Sony&#8217;s &#8220;Show Me How&#8221; system lets you ease into working with the software, and I highly recommend spending a few hours practicing on them if you want to get serious with the software.‚ </p>
<p>There are also 3,000 build in music loops, 1,000 MIDI files and the capability for importing your own audio to mix up. You can also record live from your own instruments via your sound card.‚ </p>
<p>Finally, when you&#8217;re done you can export your audio artwork to CD&#8217;s, flash drives, MP3 players or package them for easy web streaming.‚ </p>
<p>I have always prefered Acid over the years to Adobe&#8217;s Audition, and being a PC guy I don&#8217;t have much experience with Garage Band. I can tell you that if you want to really ease into audio editing and mixing, there&#8217;s a free, open source title out there called <a href="http://audacity.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">Audacity</a>. While it&#8217;s not as polished or powerful as the boxed products, it is a great, free resource for audio editing.</p>
<p>There are a bunch of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_audio_workstation" target="_blank">other DAW&#8217;s</a> out there, but I&#8217;ve found Acid Pro and now Acid Music Studio balance power and learning curve better than the competitors. There&#8217;s also a <a href="http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/download/trials/musicstudio" target="_blank">free trial available</a>.‚ </p>
<p>Overall, Music Studio won&#8217;t do everything that Acid Pro 6 does &#8212; particularly with sample rates. Music Studio maxes out as 16/48kHz while Pro can do 24/192kHz. Pro also can process 5.1 surround sound recordings. But if you&#8217;re just looking to break into music creation and mixing, I love Music Studio.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/sony-acid-music-studio-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An iPod blimp: The Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/an-ipod-blimp-the-bowers-wilkins-zeppelin/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/an-ipod-blimp-the-bowers-wilkins-zeppelin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowers & wilkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeppelin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=1847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's heavy and shiny and costs as much as a high-end home audio center channel, but the Bowers &#038; Wilkins Zeppelin will do things to your iPod audio that you weren't sure she was capable of.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><div style="border-right: #cccccc 0px solid; padding-right: 5px; border-top: #cccccc 5px solid; padding-left: 5px; font-weight: bold; float: right; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #cccccc 0px solid; width: 100px; line-height: 18px; padding-top: 5px; border-bottom: #cccccc 5px solid; font-family: verdana;"><small>4 out of 5 stars<br />
</small></div>
<p>Oh. Ohhhh&#8230; Interesting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s heavy and shiny and costs as much as a high-end home audio center channel, but the <a href="http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/" target="_blank">Bowers &amp; Wilkins</a> Zeppelin will do things to your iPod audio that you we<a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ipodblimp.jpg"></a>ren&#8217;t sure she was capable of.</p>
<p>Sure, at $600, it&#8217;s more expensive than any iPod, but if you want a $20 speaker system, there&#8217;s plenty of those out there that sound like amplified earbuds.</p>
<p>The Zeppelin sounds phenomenal. It weighs in at almost 17 pounds and packs five drivers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s built around a central 5&#8243; bass driver, two 3.5&#8243; midranges and two 1&#8243; metal dome tweeters for those high notes and puts out 100 total watts of power, which is as powerful as any standard home theater setup.</p>
<p>Why the constant comparison to home theater components? Because the Zeppelin acts more like a piece of equipment than a device. It feels more like an antique wood coffee table than a plastic folding card table. The majority of audio components sound &#8220;good.&#8221; A bunch of them sound &#8220;bad.&#8221; And then there&#8217;s a breed that sounds like what your &#8220;always-has-to-have-the-best&#8221; neighbor has. The audio quality on the Zeppelin is amazing, and it&#8217;s even more amazing that this device was specifically built for iPods.</p>
<p>And if there is to be any complaint about the Zeppelin, it&#8217;s that it is 99 percent iPod-centric. Obviously there&#8217;s no CD player. There&#8217;s no radio. You can plug a Zune or any other audio device in, but then you&#8217;re left with this arm in the middle where the iPod is <em>supposed</em> to go.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s not a complaint, because this seems to work just fine. We&#8217;re a music consuming world that&#8217;s now 99 percent iPod (or iPhone now) centric, so why not plop your pod into something like the Zeppelin?</p>
<p>The remote control doesn&#8217;t work that well. There, I issued a complaint. It&#8217;s good up till about 10 feet and then it&#8217;s hit or miss.</p>
<p>With a product like this, all we&#8217;re missing out on here is the fact that we&#8217;re still largely using compressed MP3 files that don&#8217;t sound as good as pure, unadulterated audio. Do yourself a favor sometime, plug a CD player into a device like this. I did.</p>
<p>Digression over.</p>
<p>The Zeppelin works with iPod Touch, Classic, 4th and 5th generation, Nano and Mini. There&#8217;s also an auxiliary input port so that you can plug in just about any device. You can also use composite or S-Video to output video to a television or display.</p>
<p>This is a peach of a product that you should definitely check out.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1852" title="It's built around a central 5" bass driver, two 3.5 midranges and two 1" metal dome tweeters for those high notes and puts out 100 total watts of power, which is as powerful as any standard home theater setup." src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ipodblimp.jpg" alt="Bowers &#038; Wilkins Zeppelin on BlastMagazine.com" /></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Technical features</th>
<td>Digital Signal Processing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>Digital amplifier</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>Switch mode power supply</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Description</th>
<td>iPod speaker system</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Drive units</th>
<td>1x 125mm (5 in) bass</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>2x 90mm (3.5 in) midrange</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>2x 25mm (1 in) metal dome tweeter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Frequency range</th>
<td>-6dB at 47Hz and 22kHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Amplifier power output</th>
<td>1x 50W (bass)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>2x 25W (midrange/tweeter)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Power input voltage</th>
<td>100V &#8211; 240V ~ 50/60Hz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Rated power consumption</th>
<td>20W</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Standby power consumption</th>
<td>3.7W</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Inputs</th>
<td>30-pin iPod connector</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>3.5mm mini jack analogue / optical digital</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>USB 2.0 slave (software upgrades)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Outputs</th>
<td>S-video (mini DIN)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>Composite video (RCA Phono)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Height</th>
<td>173mm (6.8 in) without tilt pad</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>198mm (7.8 in) with tilt pad</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Width</th>
<td>640mm (25.2 in)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Depth</th>
<td>208mm (8.2 in)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Net weight</th>
<td>7.5kg (16.5 lb)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Finish</th>
<td>Enclosure: Polished stainless steel with black trim</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th> </th>
<td>Grilles: Black cloth</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/an-ipod-blimp-the-bowers-wilkins-zeppelin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rotel&#8217;s high-end DVD player</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/gaming/reviews/rotels-high-end-dvd-player/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/gaming/reviews/rotels-high-end-dvd-player/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd-r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High-end component maker Rotel recently let us test out their RDV-1093 DVD player to some fantastic results. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img src="/images/media/rotel1093.jpg" alt="Rotel 1093 DVD player" width="600" /></p>
<div style="border-right: #cccccc 0px solid; padding-right: 5px; border-top: #cccccc 5px solid; padding-left: 5px; font-weight: bold; float: right; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #cccccc 0px solid; width: 100px; line-height: 18px; padding-top: 5px; border-bottom: #cccccc 5px solid; font-family: verdana;"><small>4.5 out of 5 stars<br />
</small></div>
<p>High-end component maker <a href="http://www.rotel.com/">Rotel</a> recently let us test out their RDV-1093 DVD player to some fantastic results.</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re at the point where we&#8217;re thinking of Blu-ray, professionals and philes will appreciate the 1093 for its rich audio output and 1080p upconverting display.</p>
<p>The player supports a variety of formats including: DVD-Video for movies, DVD-Audio for high-resolution audio, DVD-R and DVD-RW. SVCD and JPEG photo discs, conventional music CDs or CD-R/RW discs and full MP3/WMA support on recorded discs.</p>
<p>There are also plenty of plugs including optical and coaxial audio, component and HDMI, 5.1 channel output and old-school composite video/stereo audio.</p>
<p>Another aspect not overlooked by Rotel is power management. &#8220;A switching power supply with an advanced pulse circuit and individually regulated supply stages generate optimal voltages,&#8221; Rotel says about the product. &#8220;Critical audio and video D/A converters are all wideband designs.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an amazing audio/video device that really blew us away. It&#8217;s an expensive toy at over $1,000, but it&#8217;s really solid.</p>
<p><img src="/images/media/rdv1093_back.jpg" alt="Rotel 1093 DVD player REAR" width="600" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/gaming/reviews/rotels-high-end-dvd-player/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Success is cubed for iHome</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/success-is-cubed-for-ihome/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/success-is-cubed-for-ihome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ihome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reson8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review: The cubular iHome iH12 iPod dock is an iAwesome iWay to iPlay your iTunes and iVideos]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Let&#8217;s just get the standard stuff out of the way right now. The iHome iH12 comes in black and pink. It docks and charges any iPod. It plays music and video with a high-quality powered speaker. It has built-in alarms. It has a radio too.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ve toed the company line. That&#8217;s what the iH12 and every other iHome product does. It&#8217;s what they do, and they&#8217;re very good at it.</p>
<p>The iH12 is a compact cube with a backlit display, dual alarms and gradually progressing volume for waking and sleeping. It has a remote, AM/FM radio with 12 presets and an auxilary input to plug in your non-iPod devices.</p>
<p>The device has iHome&#8217;s usual Reson8 speaker with passive subwoofer for bass. It&#8217;s not going to shake a room, but the iH12 projects a clear sound that&#8217;s as good as any of the docks on the market.</p>
<p>It is not compatible with 3rd generation or earlier iPods, so make sure you have something fairly new to throw at it.</p>
<p>At $80, it&#8217;s priced right in the meaty curve of the iPod-audio-docking-alarm-clocking products. Give it a shot.</p>
<p>4 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/success-is-cubed-for-ihome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tinbot iPod cases</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tinbot-ipod-case/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tinbot-ipod-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadget features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin bot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tinbot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=1113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I saw the unique urban and very contemporary design of the Tinbot, and I knew I just had to try it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>During the past month I&#8217;ve been looking  for the right case to fit my iPod. I&#8217;ve looked at many types and designs,  but was shocked when I saw the unique urban, contemporary design  of the <a href="http://thetinbot.com/" target="_blank">Tinbot</a>, and I knew I just had to try it.</p>
<p>Essentially Tinbot cases are custom  pre-designed solid tin cases, with cut-outs for the iPod&#8217;s ports. Tinbot  offers 11 great designs, starting at $19.99 for a plain white design  and $29.99 for other design cases. Orders must be placed online at <a href="http://tinbot.com/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">http://thetinbot.com</span></a> and the company is working on expanding their  product line to allow custom designs.</p>
<p><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/images/media/grouptinbots.jpg" alt="Tinbot iPod Cases on BlastMagazine.com" /></p>
<p>In person, it&#8217;s amazing how the design just &#8220;pops&#8221; out. The colors are vibrant and  the contrast excellent; however, I was not so impressed at the overall  case itself. The form factor of my Tinbot wasn&#8217;t good at all, and the case didn&#8217;t  feel right in my hands.</p>
<p>The overall shape is very &#8220;boxy,&#8221; and  it was a real pain prying the lid off the case when changing songs.  The case feels extremely cheap and after a week of use the hinge is ready  to fall off any day now. These issues cheapen features like  the nice padding inside and excellent  design.</p>
<p>Dare I say, the product is kind of tinny.</p>
<p>Tinbot leaves much more to be desired  and I would not recommend purchasing, mainly because as of now, the unit is so  cheap that I wouldn&#8217;t even trust my iPod in it. Overall, it&#8217;s low quality for a high price.</p>
<p>Overall: 2 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/tinbot-ipod-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Altec Lansing SoundBar</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-soundbar/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-soundbar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec lansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's certainly priced right, and if you're looking for a clear, compact speaker that won't need its own room and require multiple wall and ceiling mountings, the SoundBar is a great choice. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>When the subwoofer earned its rightful place in the realm of computer audio, one of the smallest computer peripherals became one of the largest overnight. The deep bass and added clarity gave computer audio a tremendous gift, but that gift has been one of the hardest aspects of computing to micro-ize as computer footprints get smaller and monitors universally become flat.<br id="hz_b" /></p>
<p>We have seen some excellent smaller, two-piece computer speakers (Bose has a great one for $400). There are also some excellent one-piece systems, like a Polk Audio product for $1,000.<br id="wf50" /><br />
There are several choices in subwooferless computer speakers. There always have been. Most of them suck or are too expensive or both. The challenge has always been to somehow capture the sound that comes with today&#8217;s 2.1, 4.1 and 5.1 (even 6.1 and 7.1 that we&#8217;ve seen&#8230;) computer speaker systems. Let&#8217;s face it, a lot of users just don&#8217;t feel like mounting a complete surround system around their desktop.<br id="lgad" /><br id="pc4t" /><img class="aligncenter" src="http://blastmagazine.com/images/media/sbv1180.jpg" alt="Altec Lansing SoundBar" /></p>
<p>The Altec Lansing SoundBar tries to pick up the slack and give users a compact solution that won&#8217;t sound like two tin cans and a string.<br id="tljs" /><br id="vxad" />At $80, it is not going to compete with the Polk SurroundBar, but it&#8217;s a long shot better than the $10 Dell Sound Bar that is made to retrofit their Ultrasharp monitors.<br id="rk_h" /><br id="xer2" />The Altec Lansing SoundBar sits comfortably below any flat monitor and lets you connect your computer and any other headphone-jack device, like an iPod, simultaneously. <br id="hhsd" /><br id="ii_5" />Here&#8217;s what you should know about the SoundBar: it does its job. He&#8217;s a blue-collar, clock-punching factory worker who&#8217;s happy with his lot in life. The product has good bass, excellent highs and projects a pretty clear sound. But it&#8217;s not going to shake a room. <br id="tpa4" /><br id="i:l6" />The SoundBar is still a one-piece speaker system without a subwoofer, and nobody is trying to sell it as anything different. So don&#8217;t expect it. It also doesn&#8217;t deliver (or claim to deliver) a three-dimensional surround sound experience. This isn&#8217;t a home theater unit. It&#8217;s not going to make you jerk your head around to see where that sound came from. The SoundBar is essentially a center channel that does a decent job of separating left and right effects.</p>
<p>The SoundBar is powered by three 2&#8243; divers; two of them are active, full-range speakers, while the third is passive and handles the bass. The device is controlled by a single knob that handles power, volume and muting. The line-in and headphone jacks are also useful, and they give you audio ports right at your fingertips.<br id="go4c" /><br id="ez6e" />It&#8217;s certainly priced right, and if you&#8217;re looking for a clear, compact speaker that won&#8217;t need its own room and require multiple wall and ceiling mountings, this is a great choice.</p>
<p>Overall: 4 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-soundbar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG BH200: Last call for dual-format!</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/lg-bh200-last-call-for-dual-format/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/lg-bh200-last-call-for-dual-format/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD-DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so you bet on the wrong horse. You early-adopted HD DVD. It was cheaper. It was attractive. It had a nice ring to it &#8212; it&#8217;s not DVD, it&#8217;s HD DVD. I mean, when has Sony ever won a format war? MiniDisc? Bah. No way Blu-ray will ever win this format war. And you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Okay, so you bet on the wrong horse. You early-adopted HD DVD. It was cheaper. It was attractive. It had a nice ring to it &#8212; it&#8217;s not DVD, it&#8217;s HD DVD. I mean, when has Sony ever won a format war? MiniDisc? Bah. No way Blu-ray will ever win this format war.</p>
<p>And you were dead ass wrong.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t fret if you&#8217;re stuck with 30 HD DVD discs as you rush to be a good consumer and begin to consume Blu-ray discs. There are still a few options out there that will let you play with both.</p>
<p>The LG BH200 is one of those options, and if you&#8217;re looking for DVD, HD DVD and Blu-ray playback, it&#8217;s one of the best.</p>
<p>The BH200 puts out an amazing picture over HDMI and Component Video, and it upconverts DVD&#8217;s &#8212; and yes, they do look better.</p>
<p>The problem is that looks aren&#8217;t everything, and the BH200 is bad at optical audio output, failing to send a proper DTS signal for Blu-ray and failing to send either a DTS or Dolby Digital signal over optical audio out for some DVD&#8217;s that I tested.</p>
<p>The unit also has Ethernet built in, but you can&#8217;t upgrade the firmware over the Internet. Doh.</p>
<p>Lastly, the product takes as much time to power up as a desktop PC. When I press the eject button on my video player, I want it to spit out the disc, not turn on, boot up, load, load, load and then eject the disc over a minute later.</p>
<p>Basically, it&#8217;s like this &#8212; if you use HDMI for video AND audio and you need to play every format available, the new low price of the BH200 is attractive.</p>
<p>But HD DVD is dead, and this player might have come on the market a tad too late.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/lg-bh200-last-call-for-dual-format/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A 21st century boombox, Altec Lansing iM9</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im9/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec lansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boombox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inmotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inmotion im9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/2008/02/altec-lansing-im9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An 80s child, I grew up during the last days of cassette tapes (the term mix-tape had to come from somewhere, it&#8217;s not just the CD you burned from your iTunes downloads). With cassette tapes, we had boomboxes. They came in all shapes and sizes, and depending on the age, they were very, very analog. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><img src="/images/editorschoice1.jpg" alt="Editor's Choice" style="margin: 5px; float: left" /> An 80s child, I grew up during the last days of cassette tapes (the term mix-tape had to come from somewhere, it&#8217;s not just the CD you burned from your iTunes downloads).</p>
<p>With cassette tapes, we had boomboxes. They came in all shapes and sizes, and depending on the age, they were very, very analog. And the boombox hasn&#8217;t gone away entirely. Some will say the large-form boxes are enjoying a <a href="http://blogs.nypost.com/fashion/archives/2007/07/booms_in_bloom.html" target="_blank">comeback</a> of sorts.</p>
<p>Of course, now we have iPods, satellite radio, HD Radio, Zunes (well one or two) and every song we could possibly want at the tip of our fingers for 99 cents.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just something about a July day on the beach with a cooler and a boombox, though. And that&#8217;s why I like Altec Lansing&#8217;s inMotion iM9 iPod system and all the lower-case i&#8217;s that go with it. It just screams retro, and I think that&#8217;s why <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000EDKP8U?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=blasmaga-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">consumers</a> are really taking to this one.</p>
<p>First of all, it runs on either AC power or four C batteries. Some people might not like constantly changing the batteries, but it&#8217;s still a far cry better than the current technology of rechargeable batteries that never reach 100 percent again. Fresh batteries = peak sound. You get 24 hours of battery life from the C&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The second retro piece comes in how you plug an iPod into the iM9. You press the button at the top and, just like a cassette deck, a door opens letting you drop your pod in.</p>
<p>Third on the retro block, the iM9 comes with a BACKPACK. I&#8217;d never use it. It&#8217;s tacky. But damn, it&#8217;s a backpack!</p>
<p>Finally, this mother is LOUD. And it&#8217;s not just loud; it&#8217;s clear, crisp and deep. The iM9 may not be the size of a boombox, but it sure sounds like one. The system is built on 2.75&#8243; drivers, but the bass rivals many larger systems. The highs are also crystal clear. The iM9 does have a slight hiss, even when music isn&#8217;t playing. It gets annoying, especially if you want to leave the device in your bedroom or something.</p>
<p>The iM9 has a rugged case, and I think it&#8217;s a versatile option for outdoor listening. It&#8217;s not weather/water proof, but you can put it next to the grill, poolside or bring it to the beach.</p>
<p>There are several indoor applications, including audio and video outputs to hook your iPod up to your television.</p>
<p>The product works with iPod, iPod video, Nano, and Mini. The iM9 does work with new generation Nanos. There have been several <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/product/B000EDKP8U/ref=cm_cr_dp_synop?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending#R1CAPZFENBZJ2S&tag=blasmaga-20" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">complaints</a> that it doesn&#8217;t work with the 2/3G iPod Nano, but it does. The device just didn&#8217;t come with the proper adapter. It was a huge F-up, but Altec Lansing offers the adapter for free for new Nano users.</p>
<p>Overall, the iM9 is impressive, compact and loud. It debuted with a $200 price tag, but you can scoop one up online for about $70. I say you should do just that.</p>
<p><strong>Quick hits:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Developer:</strong>  <a href="http://www.alteclansing.com/">Altec Lansing</a><br />
<strong>Genre:</strong> iPod audio system<br />
<strong>Launch Date:</strong> May 12, 2006</p>
<p>Overall: 4.5 out of 5 stars <em>Editor&#8217;s choice</em></p>
<p><a href="/files/IM9_MAN.pdf">Download the manual</a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retro: Altec Lansing PowerCube Plus ACS48</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/retro-altec-lansing-powercube-plus-acs48/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/retro-altec-lansing-powercube-plus-acs48/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Review Center</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acs48]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec lansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powercube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powercube plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/2008/02/retro-altec-lansing-powercube-plus-acs48/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without question, the PowerCube Plus ACS48 was one of a few product releases by Altec Lansing, Labtec and a few other companies that changed computer audio forever. Ten years ago, soundcards were starting to get better, but speaker offerings still largely consisted of two-piece, unpowered sets that sounded like cheap headphones. The PowerCube Plus ACS48, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><em>Without question, the PowerCube Plus ACS48 was one of a few product releases by Altec Lansing, Labtec and a few other companies that changed computer audio forever. Ten years ago, soundcards were starting to get better, but speaker offerings still largely consisted of two-piece, unpowered sets that sounded like cheap headphones. The PowerCube Plus ACS48, a strong, powered system, with a subwoofer &#8212; it was one of the best computer audio systems ever made.</em></p>
<p><em>As you read this article, you may not think much of the 20 and 40 watts tat the ACS48 runs on. After all, basic home theater systems today run on 100+ watts. But on a computer system, you just didn&#8217;t see much in the way of power.</em></p>
<p><em>This review was originally produced by The Review Center in 1998.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/powercubeplus1.jpg" title="Retro: Altec Lansing PowerCube Plus ACS48"><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/powercubeplus1.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Retro: Altec Lansing PowerCube Plus ACS48" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px" /></a>This kind of thing is always a joy to review. Not only was it easy to set up, but it was especially fun to turn up the sub-woofer as loud as possible and blast some music!</p>
<p>The award-winning ACS48 system was much more than we bargained for with an under $100 system. A few quick facts about this well deserving 5-star system include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Volume Controls Adjust All Three Speakers Simultaneously: just 1 volume control</li>
<li>High quality, high performance three-piece system</li>
<li>Powered speaker satellites are electronically controlled and magnetically shielded</li>
<li>Powered subwoofer extends the low frequency response to add realism and bass</li>
</ul>
<p>Electric power is a must have on a computer speaker system. We were all happy to see this included in the unit. Overall, this is a great system, boasting a 40 watt subwoofer, 20 watt satellite speakers.</p>
<p>The wood subwoofer is an ingenious add-in. It really brings out the true quality of the sound. Plastic is not as high quality as a genuine wood base. The wood really makes the sound rich and vibrant. The subwoofer is just perfect &#8212; it&#8217;s not something that you hear in a car that sounds like a nuclear device going off, but instead, its adequate 40 watts make it a perfect music and gaming speaker system. It might not be the best choice for an office, though.</p>
<p>If you really want to get crazy, Altec Lansing also makes the ACS251, a standalone powered subwoofer that you can wire up to any other speaker system.</p>
<p>Overall, the PowerCube Plus ACS48 is one of the best computer speaker sets we&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p><strong>Technical specifications:</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Drivers (per satellite):</strong> One 3&#8243; shielded full range driver and one 3/4&#8243; high frequency tweeter<br />
<strong>Drivers (subwoofer): </strong>One 6 inch long throw woofer<br />
<strong>Satellite Power: </strong>20 Watts per channel RMS at 0.8% THD<br />
<strong>Subwoofer Power:</strong> 40 Watts at 0.8% THD<br />
<strong>System Response:</strong> 35 Hz &#8211; 20 kHz<br />
<strong>Input Impedance:</strong> &gt;10k ohms<br />
<strong>S/N Ratio:</strong> &gt;65dB</p>
<p><strong>Quick hits:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Company Name: </strong><a href="http://www.alteclansing.com">Altec Lansing</a><br />
<strong>Price:</strong> $99.99</p>
<p>Overall: 5 out of 5 stars</p>
<p><img src="/images/editorschoice.jpg" alt="An original Reviewcenter.com editor's choice!" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/retro-altec-lansing-powercube-plus-acs48/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPort FS-2 iPod Docking System</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iport-fs-2-ipod-docking-system/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iport-fs-2-ipod-docking-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docking station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docking system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/2008/01/iport-fs-2-ipod-docking-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPort FS-2 is a multipurpose docking system compatible with all 30 pin dock connecting iPods. The purpose of the product is to let you plug your iPod into both a stereo/home theater system and a computer in one fell swoop. Now, it adds a decent amount of wires to your system, and I felt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>The iPort FS-2 is a multipurpose docking system compatible with all 30 pin dock connecting iPods.</p>
<p>The purpose of the product is to let you plug your iPod into both a stereo/home theater system and a computer in one fell swoop.</p>
<p>Now, it adds a decent amount of wires to your system, and I felt it would have been much more useful as a wireless product &#8212; letting you plug your iPod into the dock near your computer and beam music to the receiver end plugged into your stereo.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=blasmaga-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=13&amp;l=st1&amp;mode=electronics&amp;search=iport&amp;fc1=000000&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;lc1=0E3B6F&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" border="0" style="border: medium none " frameborder="0" height="60" scrolling="no" width="468"></iframe></p>
<p>There are three situations where the iPort FS-2 is extremely useful. First, if you don&#8217;t have front A/V inputs on your home theater receiver, you can plug the iPort in the back and know it&#8217;s always there when you need it. Second, if you have a home theater PC used to sync songs on your iPod. Finally, it&#8217;s also useful if your household has more than one iPod &#8212; you can swap them back and forth and listen to your tunes on your home system.</p>
<p>I had preconceived reservations at first, but the iPort is one of the best A/V iPod docking solutions out there. It basically lets you plug all the audio and video wires into your receiver one time and forget it. Now all you have to do is drop any iPod in and you&#8217;re ready to go.</p>
<p>iPort created the product to allow users to plug into computers and receivers at the same time, but unless you have a computer a few feet from your stereo/receiver (or a laptop) I don&#8217;t see how that&#8217;s possible.</p>
<p>If you do have a computer or home theater PC nearby (and aren&#8217;t just playing music off that&#8230;) then it&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>The system supports A/V wires of up to 25 feet though, so you can definitely navigate across the room. The <a href="http://www.iportmusic.com/">iPort company</a> offers a bunch of in-wall solutions that go longer (up to 500 feet of audio in some cases), but this is their desktop variant, and it&#8217;s definitely a handy gadget.</p>
<p>Music and video are both crisp and clear. Give this one a shot.</p>
<p><strong>Quick hits:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Developer:</strong> <a href="http://www.iportmusic.com/">iPort</a><br />
<strong>Platform:</strong> iPod<br />
<strong>Launch Date:</strong> June 6, 2006</p>
<p>Overall: 4 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iport-fs-2-ipod-docking-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Altec Lansing iM207 Orbit</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im207-orbit/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im207-orbit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altec lansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im207]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/2008/01/altec-lansing-im207-orbit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's got a good little "thump" to it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Altec Lansing&#8217;s new ultra-portable iPod/MP3 speaker, the Orbit, hit my desk recently.</p>
<p>Battery-powered and at under 3&#8243;, the iM207 Orbit doesn&#8217;t look like much. I mean, how much power can you pull out of 3 AAA batteries?</p>
<p>I gotta say I was surprised. The Orbit&#8217;s got a good little &#8220;thump&#8221; to it. The sound was really impressive for a speaker with no AC power. It&#8217;s also LOUD. The Orbit&#8217;s volume is controlled by the iPod, and it cranks when turned all the way up.</p>
<p>The Orbit does lose some clarity at full volume, but at 50-80 percent, you get a crisp, clean sound with great bass and highs that are surprisingly clear.</p>
<p>The big test &#8212; the theme from &#8220;House&#8221; played perfectly. The song starts with a crackling record player effect and beams out highs and lows that will test anything. This &#8220;House&#8221; fan approves.</p>
<p>You get about a full day of battery life out of the unit. Invest in some rechargeables. You might get less per charge, but you won&#8217;t have to buy them over, and over, and over again. Orbit is also shock-resistant so you can use it in any iPod application.</p>
<p>The Orbit works with any audio source that accepts a 3.5mm or 2.5mm headphone jack, and there are dozens of cheap adapters that will let you use it for other devices. It&#8217;s small with a big sound, cheap price tag and excellent sound.</p>
<p>Check out Altec&#8217;s <a href="http://www.alteclansing.com/images/user/orbit-mp3-faqs.pdf" target="_blank">FAQ</a> for technical support.</p>
<p><strong>Speaker features:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Sound clarity with depth &#8212; powered by acoustic tayloring</li>
<li>Fusion360 technology &#8212; Integrates a cone design with a custom-built Altec Lansing speaker to project a 360-degree sound field</li>
<li>Personal configuration &#8212; place the Orbit on its edge for directed, more personal listening</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Quick hits:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Developer:</strong> <a href="http://www.alteclansing.com/">Altec Lansing</a><br />
<strong>Launch Date: </strong>November 15, 2007<br />
<strong>Price:</strong> MSRP $39.95 ($29.95 in most stores)</p>
<p>Overall: 4 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/altec-lansing-im207-orbit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iSkin Cerulean wireless audio products</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iskin-cerulean-wireless-audio-products/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iskin-cerulean-wireless-audio-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earbuds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iskin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/2008/01/iskin-cerulean-wireless-audio-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iSkin&#8217;s Cerulean line of products is a handy collection of Bluetooth accessories and earbuds for iPod&#8217;s, laptops and other audio devices that let&#8217;s you go cordless. They work with laptops, iPods and mobile phones for hands-free calls. They come in a wide variety of packages and configurations. In a nutshell, there are three main Bluetooth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>iSkin&#8217;s Cerulean line of products is a handy collection of Bluetooth accessories and earbuds for iPod&#8217;s, laptops and other audio devices that let&#8217;s you go cordless. They work with laptops, iPods and mobile phones for hands-free calls.</p>
<p>They come in a wide variety of packages and configurations.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, there are three main Bluetooth devices, the TX, the RX and the F1.</p>
<p>The TX sends audio, the RX receives audio, or you can go with the F1 &#8212; stereo Bluetooth headphones.</p>
<p>The Cerulean F1 wireless stereo headphones reach 33 feet, and they allow you to to plug-in to any auxiliary audio source or iPod-compatible audio system and listen to it.</p>
<p>They are designed to with with traditional iPod docking platforms, and the TX and RX don&#8217;t require any batteries because they&#8217;re charged by the iPod and Dock-compatible audio device. You can use them with non iPod products, but you&#8217;ll need an external power source and audio wires.</p>
<p>These are great but expensive toys. A set of TX + RX or F1 + TX will run you upwards of $150. They sound great, however and are sleek and stylish on top it it all.</p>
<p>Overall, if you&#8217;re willing to put up the extra dollars, iSkin&#8217;s Cerulean line is one of the best, most compact Bluetooth devices I&#8217;ve used. It removes the wires, but it&#8217;s versatile enough to be used away from the traditional iPod application.</p>
<p>Take a look on the iSkin <a href="http://www.iskin.com">website</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://blastmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/31vh9krrapl_ss500_.jpg" alt="TX and RX" /></p>
<p><strong>Quick hits:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Distributor:</strong> <a href="http://www.iskin.com/">iSkin</a><br />
<strong>Developer:</strong> <a href="http://www.iskin.com/">iSkin</a><br />
<strong>Genre:</strong> Bluetooth audio<br />
<strong>Launch Date: </strong>August 8, 2007</p>
<p>Overall: 4 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iskin-cerulean-wireless-audio-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IOGEAR&#8217;s Bluetooth Audio Transport</title>
		<link>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iogears-bluetooth-audio-transport/</link>
		<comments>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iogears-bluetooth-audio-transport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John M. Guilfoil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iogear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blastmagazine.com/2007/12/iogears-bluetooth-audio-transport/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bluetooth Audio Transport is an all-in-one earbud wireless audio product that works with cell phones, stereos, iPods and any other audio source you can think of. Though there are some considerations to make &#8212; this isn&#8217;t a good idea for an iPod or another portable MP3 device. The way the Audio Transport works is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>The Bluetooth Audio Transport is an all-in-one earbud wireless audio product that works with cell phones, stereos, iPods and any other audio source you can think of.</p>
<p>Though there are some considerations to make &#8212; this isn&#8217;t a good idea for an iPod or another portable MP3 device. The way the Audio Transport works is that it lets you plug a set of earbuds/headphones into a Bluetooth receiver. So there are still wires to worry about, and there isn&#8217;t really a point to using this for an already portable device, unless you plan on leaving your iPod on a desk or table or somewhere stationary while you walk around the room. Just not sure why you&#8217;d do that&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, the Audio Transport does give you the ability to listen to any audio source from up to 33&#8242; (feet) away, and the sound quality is pretty good, with SRS &#8220;Wow&#8221; surround sound technology.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for a Bluetooth device, $50 is the average for cell phone solutions. The IOGEAR Audio transport, at the same price, gives you that and the expanded capabilities.</p>
<p><strong>Features:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Enjoy music wirelessly from Bluetooth-enabled computers, PDA, MP3/CD players, and more</li>
<li>Maximum wireless range up to 33 ft.(10 meters)</li>
<li>SRS WOW surround sound technology delivers optimal music listening experience</li>
<li>Supports MP3-quality stereo sound (frequency response 20Hz &#8212; 20 KHz)</li>
<li>Works with Bluetooth cell phones and allows you to pick up incoming calls even during music playback</li>
<li>Integrated 5-way headphone control buttons give you quick access to play/pause, track selection*, and volume control</li>
<li>Comfortable to wear behind-the-neck style</li>
<li>Convenient built-in rechargeable battery for up to 6 hours play time</li>
<li>Connect the Bluetooth Audio Transport to your stereo system to wirelessly listen to music stored in your Bluetooth audio devices</li>
<li>Avoids interference with other wireless devices and does not requires direct line-of-sight</li>
<li>Class 2 device compliant with Bluetooth 1.2 specifications Headphones Audio</li>
</ul>
<p>Overall: 4 out of 5 stars</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/iogears-bluetooth-audio-transport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

